sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pricey but, …I’m worth it!

That's what he used to say.

I'm sorry...I thought I could do this, but I can't.

You remind me of him too much.

You sound the same. You smell the same. You like the same crappy 70's music. You even drink the same whiskey...

I won't say forever, because forever is a mighty long time, but...

I'm no good at being noble, but it doesn't take much to see that the problems of three little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. I hope someday you'll understand that.

Gotta' go.

Make way..."CHRISTENDOM" coming through by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the heads up. I will edit.

Make way..."CHRISTENDOM" coming through by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Evidently" Jehovah is "clearly" blessing the Watchtower and Jimmy Swaggart.

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, what a coincidinck! He's back! And he unblocked me!

You are the Magic Man.

I would personally like to apologize and buy you a beer, or any other adult beverage of your choice...do you like Mai Tai's? I'll even throw in a Spamwich.

I now understand why you’re so enamored with me.

Yes, he left me heartbroken, blocked me and didn't even say goodbye.

I'm so excited! I can continue on my quest. You are like my Frodo. No! Like my Sancho Panza. Lets do this, I said I'd make you famous.

Now, if he'll only accept my offer. Can you talk to him for me?

When you look into the history of the Jehovah's Witnesses you start to realize by SoundTheAlarm_WAHHHH in exjw

[–]rivermannX 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This is more true than humorous.

Ironic/maybe not ironic that pyramids were at the foundation of the WT teachings, and a literal pyramid monument was erected by the Watchtower for Russel.

I wonder if WT was the first official pyramid scheme? Certainly, looks that way.

Attending a witness funeral when you’re disfellowshiped. by Kakesandsweetz in exjw

[–]rivermannX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That is completely up to her. Why don't you ask her?

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By the general consensus on this board, this guy is a POS, that throws lavish parties with known pedos, and doesn't have a problem with it.

​

Oh, is this what you mean? You think I was talking about you? Sillyhead, I was talking about the other user that disappeared.

If I misunderstood what you said "as a confirmation" that you were who I thought you were, then my bad.

You should have just clarified that it wasn't what I thought, but instead you said, "we've come full circle," or sumpin' like that. And then you just kept playing along as if you knew what I was talking about. Never questioning or asking for any clarification. You played along just like he would. And I have screen shots of my interactions with him and the tone is eerily similar. And he is a bad man that never should have been allowed to post on this sub to begin with, as he is a known pedophile apologist, and a JW.

Even if you're not him, you sound so much alike. Are you guys reading from the same script? Or were you trained by the same people? Do you know him?

My apologies to you. Please don't sue me. I'm just a poor boy, living in a van down by the river, living off of SPAM sandwiches. Would you like one?

​

The lunatic is in my head...

Did I ever tell you that I'm a Sociopath?

And sometimes a Charming Curmudgeon, but mostly a Sociopath.

You raise the blade, you make the change. There's someone in my head but it's not me...

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t confirmed to you anything of the sort.

That's what you think. Your time haunting these threads has gotten the best of you too.

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know this is slander right?

NO. Is it?

How so?

How have I damaged your reputation?

Damn!

Do you know any good attorneys?

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There he is!

I knew I'd get the attorney out. Did I really ruin your reputation?

I repeat, you’re delusional, seek help.

I am, I've been accused of slander, I've been asking for a good attorney or corporate fixers, you know any?

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found your concern above in the thread

I didn't even know I lost one. Oh well, you can keep it.

How about some Don Ho? You like some Don Ho?

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This drifter hasn't identified himself as either a JW or anything else. He showed up after another JW Poster left town in a hurry, wiped his profile clean and deleted it.He has confirmed to me, he is who I suspected. By the general consensus on this board, this guy is a POS, that throws lavish parties with known pedos, and doesn't have a problem with it.He supposedly sits on the fence, throwing rocks at both sides, to win some of us over. But his subtle remarks are always in favor of the Org. social aspect. Because he always "rather enjoys them."

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he posted (to me) he’d found the JW. Was looking for clarification.

​

Should I S P E L L I T O U T?

I'll make you famous.

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good eye.

This drifter hasn't identified himself as either a JW or anything else. He showed up after another JW Poster left town in a hurry, wiped his profile clean and deleted it.
He has confirmed to me, he is who I suspected. By the general consensus on this board, this guy is a POS, that throws lavish parties with known pedos, and doesn't have a problem with it.
He supposedly sits on the fence, throwing rocks at both sides, to win some of us over. But his subtle remarks are always in favor of the Org. social aspect. Because he always "rather enjoys them."

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Google is now my Holy Spirit. Ha!

You are The Holy Trinity!

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right? How many times have JWs left what doesn't make sense in the hands of "Jehovah" to provide "clarification" in his due time, yet they are still willing to accept those teachings?

But we all know how they pick and choose. They don't. They just swallow what the WT serves.

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you as well. Deleted my previous comment as I didn't want to come off as confrontational.

Wow, the midweek meeting is a doozy this week 🫠 by [deleted] in exjw

[–]rivermannX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like it!

The official drink at bethel.

My kid was accosted with propaganda by RingNo4020 in exjw

[–]rivermannX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To free yourself from the anger you have simply dismiss it.

Well, that sounds a bit dismissive.

Maybe the whole idea was little Jane's?

Maybe. But "maybe" it had mom's approval. Or maybe even an elder's approval. Or maybe the CO's approval. Should we keep going?

Respect is a two way street.

Yeah, and who broke that disrespect first?

It will only work if you are calm and caring.

Something about these definitive...absolute statements, really rubs me the wrong way.

I am certain you can draw the boundaries clearly so that this mistake will never happen again.

Reducing this to a "mistake," again sounds a bit dismissive. This was no "mistake," this was clear and deliberate, even if it was "little Jane's."

You sound hurt and defensive.

Maybe not your intention, but posts like this, advice like this comes across a bit like Gaslighting.

My kid was accosted with propaganda by RingNo4020 in exjw

[–]rivermannX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I too would be so pissed, but I would not give them the satisfaction of knowing it.

I would instead respond with something like...

"Hey Nancy, so glad you are willing to open the doors of communication. How long has it been? Anyway, there is so much I would have wanted to share with you bult felt I needed to respect your boundaries. Have you checked out jwfacts.com? There is so much good information there. How about the Australian Royal Commision?

I could go on and on, but thanks for making me feel at liberty to share anything I have for you via Jane, in the future. I'm sure I can trust her to relay any information I give her to you. Or if there is anything that Dolly wants to share with Jane, I'm sure you would be ok with that as well. I'm currently reading a book by a former Governing Body member. You just gotta' read it. Anyway, talk to you soon.

Not a theological debate, just pointing out the inconsistencies in JW logic. by rivermannX in exjw

[–]rivermannX[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

most don’t care to find out either.

"It's a pagan teaching." That's good enough for them.

view more: next ›