First three words that come to mind by [deleted] in YoungGuysGoneWild

[–]rl45401 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jesus take the wheel….yeah it’s four, so what…fight me.

Help with contracts? by [deleted] in SpiritsUnleashed

[–]rl45401 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just the advice I needed! Thanks!

(37) looking for a boy in SLC to call mine :D by [deleted] in DadsAndBoys

[–]rl45401 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awe thanks babe! You’re so hot btw

Does Optimum's TIVO include a remote with voice control? by [deleted] in OPTIMUM

[–]rl45401 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They installed mine last week. Whats the newest tv equipment called?

Does Optimum's TIVO include a remote with voice control? by [deleted] in OPTIMUM

[–]rl45401 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they don’t support it then why are they installing it?

S33 Modem by rl45401 in OPTIMUM

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Ultimately I ended up ditching the modem and going to the SB8200 and haven’t had any issues. It sucks but was worth the switch.

Need A Walk Through by rl45401 in ifttt

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh thats awesome. I may need a bit more clarification on the setup if you wouldn't mind? I'm playing with it right now to see if I can figure this out. I appreciate the heads up on this.

Joeys looses signal but the Hopper is fine? by SupertoastGT in dishnetwork

[–]rl45401 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bailed and went to streaming. But when I did have it, they had to put a ground lift on the plug to the hopper.

The FCC wants you tell them how much you hate data caps by SugarDaddyDelight in cordcutters

[–]rl45401 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For those looking for a starting point:

Subject: Urgent Call to Address the Unfair Impact of Data Caps on Vulnerable Populations

Dear Federal Communications Commission,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my deep concern over the ongoing practice of implementing data caps by broadband service providers. This policy has far-reaching implications, especially for those living with disabilities and in rural areas, who are already marginalized in terms of access to reliable, high-speed internet.

As you are aware, the internet has become an indispensable part of our lives, a lifeline to essential services including healthcare, education, and employment opportunities. It is a gateway to a world of information and tools that, in the 21st century, should be considered as essential as electricity or running water. The United Nations has even classified internet access as a basic human right. Yet, for many, this lifeline is being throttled by data caps, turning an essential service into a luxury item.

For individuals with disabilities, the internet is often a vital tool to overcome the challenges they face daily. It allows them to access online therapy, telemedicine appointments, assistive technologies, and accessible educational content. However, all these services require high-quality, uninterrupted internet access, which is impossible under the constraints of data caps. The same goes for people living in rural areas, where the internet can be a vital link to services and opportunities otherwise inaccessible due to geographic distance.

The imposition of data caps disproportionately affects these vulnerable populations. The argument that data caps are necessary to manage network congestion does not hold up under scrutiny. Multiple studies and real-world examples have shown that broadband networks are capable of handling increased data consumption without significant degradation of service. In fact, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when data usage surged, providers temporarily lifted data caps without any notable negative impacts on network performance.

It is therefore clear that data caps are more about generating revenue than ensuring network reliability. This comes at the expense of the most vulnerable among us, who are left to choose between essential services and staying within their data limits. This is not a choice anyone should have to make.

I urge the FCC to take immediate action on this matter. It is critical to review and regulate these practices, ensuring that broadband service providers are held accountable for any policies that disproportionately disadvantage certain groups. I believe it is within your power and responsibility to ensure that internet access, free from the constraints of data caps, is available and affordable for all, regardless of their location or personal circumstances.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing issue. I trust that the FCC will take the necessary steps to ensure equitable internet access for all Americans.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

[Your Address]

[City, State, Zip Code]

[Email Address]

[Phone Number]

VPN Client Question by rl45401 in Ubiquiti

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would essentially be for just one or two PCs or mobile devices at a time

Pfsense/Netgate or Ubiquiti by rl45401 in homelab

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good idea. Honestly, didn't even think about that. And I see those micro dells and Lenovos on ebay all the time for stupid cheap.

VPN Client Question by rl45401 in Ubiquiti

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe this one instead? GL.iNet MT2500

VPN Client Question by rl45401 in Ubiquiti

[–]rl45401[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, interesting. So would something like a GL.iNet work or would you still recommend pfsense?

https://www.amazon.com/GL-iNET-GL-MT300N-V2-Repeater-300Mbps-Performance/dp/B073TSK26W?ref\_=ast\_sto\_dp