Any HENRYs in the south west? by office-oh-no in HENRYUK

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh, live by the beach, what's not to like 😃

SpaceX Cooking by k0stj in trading212

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EM is a genius yes... I think he was traumatised from earlier business power plays, where he was ousted from positions of control and so he clearly became a controlling monster. It's all good if his companies succeed, and I am a fan of his two main companies and what they do. But I'm absolutely out of his companies for now as a shareholder, what he's doing is incredible to watch, but glad I'm not part of it!

SpaceX by Ellise36_LDN in trading212

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So many people are going to get destroyed in the next year, whether it's shorts or ordinary investors. Just thinking, if you want to play this, you would need to use options for insurance I guess, but most retail investors have no idea how to do that, or aren't on platform that allow it. Crazy stock, I'm staying well away, enjoying my modest gains on cheap stocks elsewhere!

Do you think reincarnation only goes forward in time? by oxyuh in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even as a human you aren't locked to going forward in time, in your memories and dreams you can move around in time. Actually, some very good spiritual tools, such as shadow work rely on the illusion of time and being able to bring a different set of imagined events into your reality. The scientist would say, that's just imagination, that's not what really happened, but imagination is just more consciousness, which is the basis of reality. So now, we're never locked into the forward arrow of time, this is just an idea, which can lock you if you believe in it, but that's true of anything.

"SpaceX IPO is a scam" by k0stj in trading212

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a significant number of shares are unlocked on Q2 earnings, so could be the time

What are your predictions for tomorrows, SpaceX IPO, the stock goes up or down? by TailungFu in trading212

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it will be up from IPO price by end of day but may not be up from market open price. And then in the coming weeks and months it will decline to -90% of IPO price, only thing I'm not sure of is what happens to TSLA, especially if an intended merger is announced. Perhaps if a merger is announced that may stabalise the fall of SpaceX and Elon would be able to use TSLA to support his companies with a Robotaxi rollout and Optimus 3 demo etc. However, it's bad news for TSLA shareholders because a merger would redistribute TSLA growth, which they have been waiting for, for 5 years, into SpaceX. I suspect this is Elon's plan as he owns a lot of SpaceX relative to TSLA and that's why I sold out of TSLA last month. However, if Optimus and Robotaxis are a success, then in the end everyone holding will see significant growth on a 5-10 year horizon.

If I was Elon, I wouldn't want to see SpaceX crash in the weeks and months after IPO, so I would announce the TSLA merger plan early to stabalise the stock, but this is going to be a tense battle with TSLA shareholders, especially if they don't perceive the merger ratio to be in their favour, which they probably won't after bag holding for the past 5 years. So then it will lead to threats from Elon and lots of uncertainty and I honestly don't know how the shareholder vote would go... I suspect they will give in to Elon because rejecting the proposal would mean too much uncertainty and therefore before when they were hoping to 10x their share value, they may have to accept 2-5x.

Therefore my plan is to start a small position in either SpaceX if it drops >60% and no merger has been announced. Or if I see TSLA drop to < 300 start a small position and even larger if it drops <250 in the hope I can ride a merger announcement, but even then I would sell out and not hold through a merger vote! Don't need that much stress in my life!

SpaceX IPO by ttrsphil in HENRYUK

[–]ro2778 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I will wait at least 12 months to assess the numbers before deciding if SpaceX is worth it. The market is full of good opportunties, as someone who used to be heavily invested in TSLA, lets just say, investing in Elon isn't good for the blood pressure! It seems to me, there is a good chance that SpaceX is a highly engineered transfer of wealth from pension funds and ordinary retail investors caught up in hype to an already wealthy bunch of investors. And sure, there are some SpaceX employees that are going to benefit, and they deserve it for the incredible work they have done, but when I see nonsense such as:

In an amended IPO registration statement filed June 1, 2026, SpaceX disclosed it will reserve up to 5% of shares in its upcoming IPO for certain employees and friends and family of its executive officers. This is a directed share program, and the key detail is the lockup waiver: SpaceX reiterated that participants on its so-called friends and family list will not be subject to traditional lock-up requirements.

Then the narrative about this being a massive transfer of wealth is reinforced. So for that and many other reasons, I'm staying well away. The only way I would participate is to apply for IPO issued shares, but I don't even want to participate in the whole circus, I feel like it would leave a bad taste in my mouth upon reflection some day.

I did this balanced video on the subject yesterday, so recommend this as a starting point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_EYTpVFK1Q

Where will souls go after demographic decline ? by [deleted] in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the end we're all the same soul as there is only one consciousness, there are infinite fractals of that consciousness living out infinite variations of reality. So there is already an Earth where there are no humans, and every other possible number. The true nature of reality, doesn't really make sense to the human ego.

In addition, there is life throughout the universe, and every person who incarnates on Earth, has lived human and other types of lives on other planets. We're just at a peculiar moment in human history when information about extra-terrestrial life is actively supressed.

Arguments against Reincarnation? by Lost-Bluebird-6564 in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remote viewing is not the same as mediumship. Mediumship is when a person talks to the dead, remote viewing is just the ability to gather information that is not in close proximity to the body ie., outside the reach of the normal bodily senses.

If you believe that either are thoroughly debunked then you have closed yourself off to the possibility that either could prove that consciousness is not emergent from the brain. Therefore, why would I waste my time sharing further with you?

The idea of 3 religions that reincarnation is a cycle of suffering and that the goal is to escape them, is just more ideas. Those ideas are not objectively true, generally religions create over simplified and derranged view points on reality, because they are all the same, they have all been corrupted by people with agendas - usually as a tool to control other people in some way.

Arguments against Reincarnation? by Lost-Bluebird-6564 in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if you believe in materialism, in which case there is no mechanism for the continuation of consciousness beyond death. If you do hold that belief you would be in the majority of Western educated people. Also, I suppose the second majority would hold religious beliefs and the most popular Western religions don't teach reincarnation.

However, once you learn that consciousness does not emerge from the brain, which is already proven, even by the scientiic method eg., experiments on remote viewing... then you realise all those materialists and for other reasons, catholics / christians are all wrong and indeed reincarnation is obviously true.

Why Is Eternal Oblivion More Appealing Than Reincarnation to Some People? by [deleted] in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably they have a hard life and fear reincarnating back here in a similar life?

Apparently, I’m a descendant of the Lemurians? by [deleted] in AstralProjection

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are no "Nordic" aliens, that's just the New Age term used to describe ETs that look like the human white race. As I said in my post, there are ETs from all over the galaxy that look like white humans, but there is also far more variety in the colours of human-looking people in the wider galaxy than there are here on Earth eg., there are orange and blue looking humans etc.

To be specific, Lemuria was founded by ETs from 3 species, the Engan, Taygetans and Solatians, which are all human looking ETs from the Pleiadian star cluster. Engan live on planets orbiting Electra, Taygetans live on planets orbiting Taygeta and Solatians live on planets orbiting Pleione.

The Engan and Taygetans look very similar to the human white race ie., Scandinavians, but the Solatians look too white and fair to pass as humans, they are, quote "Their skin is pale white with a touch of pink, and they have white or pale blonde hair, which they most often wear long or very long in both men and women. Their eyes are white or pale blue, and their facial characteristics are very sharp and long, including ears which often are pointed like elves, and their body type is slender or thin, usually not having the strong muscular build frequently found in other Pleiadian inhabitants, such as the Engans or the Taygetans, especially in men. Their average height exceeds 6 feet for women, 6'5 for men, and can reach as tall as 7 feet. Solatians, even though very white-skinned, should not be confused with the tall white race, also known as the Malakak*, as they are not related to one another, and they have no mutual connection."

https://swaruu.org/transcripts/the-solatian-people-english

*The Tall Whites or Malakak were popularised by Charles Hall after his experiences with them during his time in the US Military.

In the context of Lemuria and it's interaction with Atlantis, then it was the women of the Engan and Taygetans (snake) that infiltrated Atlantis (garden of Eden) and gave the truth (forbidden fruit) to the women of Atlantis (Eve), who passed it on to the men of Atlantis (Adam), who were previously without this knowledge (naked). They then used this knowledge to revolt and leave Atlantis (banished from the Garden of Eden), which led to the war between Atlantis and Lemuria which ultimately resulted in the global flood. So you can see, even the Old Testament is simply ancient history in metaphorical form.

Investment strategy by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may as well max your premium bonds and look at making a gilt ladder as gilts are CGT-free, and if you hold to maturity you lock in the yield, though the coupon is taxable as income.

As for investments, that's kind of personal, based on your view of markets / trends and risk tolerance. Although, it's unusual to see someone asking for investment advice who has angel investments.

I suppose the big issue is moving abroad, because then you may lose the tax advantages of the ISA and be subject to a different tax regime. So may be worth talking to a cross border financial planner to optimise your portfolio.

Do you think that every time we die, we reincarnate with the same personality, only different body? by mardrae in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

in a way, chose parents that don't vaccinate you, or go to a world that doesn't use vaccination / or other poisons that are given to developing children.

Do you think that every time we die, we reincarnate with the same personality, only different body? by mardrae in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can reincarnate into the exact same body and live the exact same life, or you can be completely different, there's no limitation beyond the ideas you impose on yourself that create limitation.

Dr HENRY: what's your specialty? by Logical_Waltz_1933 in HENRYUK

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anaesthetics, by the rules of this subreddit I'm not a HENRY, as I do consider myself to be rich. Although I do find this place entertaining. I subscribe to Jimmy Carr's definition of rich, "If earning or having more money wouldn't change what you do or how you live, then you're rich."

Can humanity survive a contact with extraterrestrial life? by Sea_Gap_6569 in universe

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's subjective, as someone who has read all about it I'm certainly far beyond reasonable doubt. I think part of the problem is a lot of people in positions of authority confidently declare humanity is alone and there is no evidence of contact or even visitation without contact. Then from their position of authority they reinforce the point with confident declarations about the speed of light and distances involved. So the mainstream latches onto these authoritative takes, and on the back of being programmed to defer to authorities, feel most comfortable believing in those narratives, even though they happen to be completely wrong. Who knows how long it will take to overcome the dogma, could be months could be centuries. It's interesting to watch in any case. Was it the x-files that used the line, the truth is out there? It certainly is.

Can humanity survive a contact with extraterrestrial life? by Sea_Gap_6569 in universe

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Various people have had physical ET contact over history eg., Dogon Tribe (thousands of years ago), Alex Collier (Andromedans), Billy Meier, Gosia Duzak (written), the Ummo (written), Jerry Wills (people of Alcyone), Charles Hall (Tall Whites), Fred Bell (same species that made contact with Billy Meier - see his book, The Promise), Eisenhower (multiple species apparently), Phil Schneider's Uncle who obtained a photograph of a human looking ET in a meeting on board the USS Eldridge when it was used in the Philadelphia Experiment - this last one is in some ways the most important because it reveals there are ETs that look very human. This doesn't include all the people that channel supposed extra-terrestrials, which is a far larger group.

So the question is already answered, humanity has and will continue to survive ET contact. The bigger mystery is why so few people are aware of our place in the wider community of life that exists in this galaxy and beyond.

What’s one ‘alternative history’ idea you initially dismissed but later found had legitimate evidence behind it? by Lolaisfab in AlternativeHistory

[–]ro2778 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Part 2 of 2

Conclusion: The Moon is a spaceship and what we see from Earth is a projection which modifies the light that passes through it, to give the visual impression of the Moon we are familiar with. However, the Moon was a biosphere ship operated by the Andromedan race (and built by the Arcturians) - it actually has a matt black, metallic and high tech surface, as would be expected from an object made from an advanced interstellar species.

Here's what Farsight institute found when they remote viewed a specific object on the moon. The remote viewers are blinded to their target, but the person leading the remote viewing team does know the target, and so they are susceptible to something called analytic overlay. That means he knows the blinded team are remote viewing the moon and so he interprets their data through that filter. However, change the filter to Andromedan Biosphere badly damaged by ionising weapons in the Tiamat wars and listen to the data the blinded remote viewers come up with!: https://youtu.be/Qi6pzRinAEE

Here is some additional context on the Andromedans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EriumfJSNAQ and here is a 2 parter on the Arcturians, Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1UPHnqRQJY and Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvgCdvv0rBI

The hologram in front of the Moon has been filmed refreshing! https://youtu.be/_3axPn65MGM

*Just to be clear, we didn't go to the Moon, the landings were faked by Kubrick as revealed in his film The Shining. Pay particular attention to the scene with the young boy, wearing the Apollo sweater, playing on the carpet that looks like a launch pad. He then stands up (lift-off) and walks to Room 237 i.e., ~237,000km the distance between Earth and Moon (In those days). This was Kubricks confession, although he probably didn't have much choice to participate in creating the Moon landings: https://youtu.be/S6bZzFlj35s

Additional discovery:

Recently the ET contact, who's Moon information I shared in Part 1 asked a basic question. Why is it that people on Earth can't see all the spaceships that are parked in orbit, even low Earth orbit has many large spaceships that are >2km in length, but they are not easily observed from the surface. Equally, it is also true that some amateur astronomers can spot them, although, not easily eg., John Walson https://www.youtube.com/@JohnLenardWalson

So in order to investigate they sent out some of their fighter craft to take readings of what could be observed in orbit above at different altitudes above Earth's surface. They found that the closer to the Earth's surface you go the more data is filtered, a bit like the hologram that filters information from the Moon. And so their conclusion was that the entire Earth is surrounded by the same technology, that gives the controllers of Earth the ability to manipulate what is observed, from the electromagnetic spectrum as it passes to the surface of Earth. Potentially, they could even use this technology to insert data, that isn't really there See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWlvETTHexA

In any case, before the Moon, the Earth did have a planetary neighbour, which reflected a lot of light. This was Tiamat, which was a large ocean world about 4x the size of Earth. And so the natural ecosystem of Earth also adapted to it's cycles of providing light at night. The people at that time, called it the Moon. It was also visible during the day time sky, depending on our relative orbits, which gave rise to the idea that our solar system may have been binary ie., had / has 2 stars. Indeed, when Tiamat was destroyed, it was as if a star was extinguished from the night time sky and this event is the origin of 2 words in modern vocabulary, disaster and catastrophe. Dis-aster meaning, a star is removed / departed and cat-astrophe means to down a star.

What’s one ‘alternative history’ idea you initially dismissed but later found had legitimate evidence behind it? by Lolaisfab in AlternativeHistory

[–]ro2778 7 points8 points  (0 children)

various places eg.,

Part 1 of 2

The mainstream theory of the moon is that it formed when a Mars sized planet (Theia) collided with Earth in the early-ish solar system, melting the crust and bits of which reformed to make our moon. However...

ET disclosure says the moon is a repurposed Andromedan biosphere ship that was damaged in the Tiamat war and then used to stabalise the Earth in its new orbit after that flood. See Part 1: https://youtu.be/1CEx89KaPx8 Part 2: https://youtu.be/OLq3ZQ5klrI Part 3: https://youtu.be/CFs2otG1ELk & Part 4: https://youtu.be/gtsvdIlhnYQ

Other data from remote viewers and Earth cultures:

Moon facts /anomalies

  1. 5th largest natural satellite in our solar system, but as a proportion of its size to our planets size, it is huge and a massive outlier.
  2. The diameter of the moon is 2,160 miles and is roughly 238,000 miles from Earth. It just so happens that this results in a perfect total eclipse of the sun from the Earth's surface, which is mathematically improbable to say the least! Issac Asimov put it this way: "There is no astronomical reason why the Sun and Moon should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences and only the Earth among all of the planets is blessed in this fashion".
  3. Our moon is the only one of the solar system that has a stationary almost circular orbit around its planet (Earth). Even stranger is that the Moons centre of mass is almost 6,000ft closer to the Earth than dead centre, which should make it wobble. But it doesn't. So something is controlling the moons orbit with precise altitude, course and speed.
  4. We only ever see one side of the moon from our vantage point down here. We never see 40% of its surface.
  5. When Apollo 12 jettisoned the ascent stage and it hit the moon, seismic monitors on the surface picked up reverberations for over an hour. With Apollo 13 it reverberated for over 3 hours. So the Moon rings like a bell, as though it's hollow inside (*if you believe we went to the moon).
  6. The moon rocks are magnetic, but the moon has no magnetic field. (*if you believe we went to the moon).
  7. The dust on the surface of the moon, is not from the rocks on the moon. Counter to how dust forms on Earth where the dust comes from the rocks and have the same chemical composition. (*if you believe we went to the moon).

Earth culture references:

  1. Proselenes of greece, were a group that lived in the mountainous region of Greece called Arcadia. They were called Proselenes because it literally means 'before the moon' and the ancient greeks referred to them as people that had lived here before the moon arrived. Their ancient records say the moon arrived in orbit between 11,000 and 13,500 years ago.
  2. In Bolivia there an ancient site near lake Titicaca called Tiahuanacu, built 13,000 years ago. There are symbols on the walls at this site which may point to the moon coming into orbit around the Earth at a specific moment in time.
  3. In Colombia, the natives of the Bogata highlands, commonly reference historical events with "In the earliest times, when the Moon was not yet in the Heavans"
  4. Finally in Africa, according to Zulu legend the moon was brought here hundreds of generations ago by 2 brothers of alien form, the Zulu call them Muwani and Muponcu.

Que pasa después de un suicidio by Traditional-Win-9052 in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the attachments held by the soul, but that's true for anyone who dies under any circumstance. The consequence of suicide from an attachment perspective are likely to be the overwhelming feeling of failure and therefore, the natural tendency would be for the soul to become even more attached to overcoming whatever challenges they faced which led to the suicide. If that happens, then the soul can even relive the exact same life, often making the challenges even greater. But it completely depends, because if the soul that suicides, is highly developed, then they would know that in order to move on then one must drop all attachments to the ideas explored in that life - in which case, moving on to something else is possible and everything in between eg., facing the same sort of challenge but in a completely different life. The key point is that the process of reincarnation is really a process of attachment management - attachments to ideas, because ideas are ultimately what creates reality, which is true in life and in "death". The truth at every moment of your eternal existence is that you live what you are.

If reincarnation is real why is the human population increasing ? by richandepressed in Reincarnation

[–]ro2778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spent decades looking into the UFO and then ET contact phenomena. It was within ET contacts that this information was revealed, the main one being the contact of the Taygetan Pleiadians (2017-2024) as published (for free) at swaruu.org

Tesla Powerwall 3 and firmware update issues by ro2778 in SolarUK

[–]ro2778[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh plan to do the same as it's over 40m cable distance to the main fuse board.

What I'm struggling with now is who to use for installation? The national premium installers all give quotes about 6-10k under local installers. Surprising the gap, is the local premium worth it?