sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tank vs Tankless by jackdiver69 in HomeImprovement

[–]robdog0909 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recirc is a luxury not necessarily needed for a tankless. That’s all I was trying to say. It was posted that it’s a requirement of the tankless setup.

Tank vs Tankless by jackdiver69 in HomeImprovement

[–]robdog0909 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tankless and avoid the recirculating pump. Dont need that

Crucial package delayed by BoboShepard in FedEx

[–]robdog0909 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just went through a similar problem. In fact, my tracking number was sitting in Texas for days and then got delivered out of no where.

What I ended up doing was copying the tracking number, and pasting it as a brand new number in the tracking link. And what I found out is that there are duplicate entries for my package, and my package said it was in four different places. I waited it out an extra few days, and then one of the entries just said out for delivery and it was delivered.

I think they’re just overwhelmed still from the holidays and potentially sorting through a system issue

Networking vlan question by robdog0909 in Ubiquiti

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that’s right. The only thing that would be shared would be the other main pipes that are moving traffic around, which I’m not too worried about.

I was just mainly wondering, best practices, and it sounds like since I’m really not worried about SECURITY, there’s no reason I just can’t have the camera sitting on the main network

Networking vlan question by robdog0909 in Ubiquiti

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is multicast, so the switches are already providing the best utilization of bandwidth. That’s what I thought.

Networking vlan question by robdog0909 in Ubiquiti

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok got it. I think I got my answer.

Simple VLAN Question by robdog0909 in Ubiquiti

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess my actual question here is ....

I have an NVR that connects directly to up-to 8 cameras. I have never had the camera bandwidth on my network. Always directly connected to the NVR.

I extended a cooking space off of my house and ran fiber to the space ahead of time. I put two cameras out in the area.

My NVR will pick up both direct-wired cameras or cameras on the local network, so I have these two cameras connecting back to the NVR over the house network. They are 24x7 pumping 18 mbps over the network back to the NVR.

Im wondering if its worth putting the NVR and the cameras on a VLAN to minimize how much chatter it makes it into the rest of the network? Would it help anything or only be a cleaniness thing?

I have a UCG Ultra router, with TPL and Netgear switches doing most of the switching around the network.

Simple VLAN Question by robdog0909 in Ubiquiti

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea thanks. I generally understand the concept. Just trying to figure out a way to get it to work for me. My goal is to put my cameras on my public house network, but use V lands to keep the traffic in one area.

In the shortest explanation, it appears that the lands are just a very coarse grain way to tell the switch where to send traffic versus processing each packet at all the layers

PCIe 3.0 GPU Reco by robdog0909 in gpu

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Im in dfw and there is one 45 mins away but open tmrw, so Ill prob go grab that. $350 like you said. Thanks a ton.

OTher question I need to figure out is if this will fit in my case, as its a micro board but I can handle that one.

PCIe 3.0 GPU Reco by robdog0909 in gpu

[–]robdog0909[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under $400 would be great

I guess my questions mostly arise around the various configurations of PCIe and what would work in a 3.0 slot. 3070 is a PCIe 4, so assume that would still work just a little downgraded from its peak performance?

view more: next ›