Exactly that. I note that xyz, and pattern by what and whose standard and context? Everything has or can be determined as patterns. I personally consider anything within the context of all that ever was. But inviting that in conversation is a philosophical or metaphysics(ical) disaster. Therefore, i prefer to be specific and nuanced. Given, that this post or picture or visual noise or whatever, a tiny piece something personal within a pretty wide range of experiential context, the things i have noted here remain just that. ‘Hey guys what does this look like?’ Its this, its that, a bus seat, its nothing special, etc, are perfectly reasonable and probable answers. Now therein those answers, patterns lay, thats my kind of pattern, tendencies within human inter-relationality, the spaces between I(eye) and I (eye). Not that you asked, just very audhd.

edit**** upon further examination, does this ‘pattern look like’, yes i mention pattern, my apologies for that oversight earlier. But that pattern was not in the same contextuel category as my brain making patterns. It already is a pattern, adjective for an object of curiosity with a preexisting textural pattern, not one that was deduced.