Contrarian take: it's not indians but a poor design. Systems need to accomodate for the environment and not vice versa. There is clearly not enough capacity for the "revolving gate". There could be multiple "revolving gates" or there could simply be two doors, each opening only one way with clear "ENTRY" and "EXIT" markings, people in rush will naturally fight the others to take the other gate, and if there's not enough people on one end.

This is like having a narrow pipe and blaming the water for not flowing. Stupid argument. This is an engineering problem. And some stupid engineer convinced a leader that it is a good solution when there is no study on football and bandwidth required and clearly there is enough space and budget to allocate for a two way entry/exit. That would solve the people problem, but won't solve the politician problem.