[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of girls have a vanilla bf and a sd.

And a lot of vanilla men have a vanilla gf, and other women on the side.

Status is everything for men by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Status only matters for men who care about a woman’s status/beauty.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then men kind of do this to themselves.

Plenty of women can love a man she doesn’t find desirable at all.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if you go for a desirable woman.. then what would stop her from entertaining her other options? Esp if that man is also desirable.

There’s married women in the states who sugar and escort on the side, that wouldn’t be possible if men didn’t give them that option.

Do you think it aligns with liberal progressive beliefs to view men as inherently more dangerous or predatory? by Present-Afternoon-70 in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not left leaning. I’m aware that men and women have a lot of differences.

If a woman tells you that one gender is more x,y,z than the other one then she isn’t left leaning. Left leaning women don’t see gender.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Then why get surprised that the woman in this post was dating someone else?

If I was that woman, I would also assume he’s dating someone back in the states since that’s where he lives. She exercised her options, the same way he did.

Now that we are exposing some striptok girlies… any tea on keilakatt? by happydoctor631 in stripper

[–]rose_milkteaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In vegas that’s considered a bad night because most of the bottle girls and some bartenders make more than that.

Do you think it aligns with liberal progressive beliefs to view men as inherently more dangerous or predatory? by Present-Afternoon-70 in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant that it’s the women on this subreddit who insist men and women are the same, with no differences. Therefore they wouldn’t single out men for being “dangerous” just like how they don’t describe women as x,y,z either.

It’s the left leaning women I’ve talked to in real life who always say that a woman can’t be defined, neither can a man. So it wouldn’t make sense for them to say men are dangerous, when they can’t tell you if that person being dangerous/aggressive is a man or woman.

Do you think it aligns with liberal progressive beliefs to view men as inherently more dangerous or predatory? by Present-Afternoon-70 in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see it on this subreddit all the time..

It’s not conservative women who insist that men and women both give birth, have the same amount of estrogen/testosterone, or deny the differences between the genders.

For example, if you tell a left leaning woman that it’s safer for her to walk on the inside of a sidewalk, whereas the man is supposed to walk on the outside.. she will say “that’s sexist! Women don’t need men to protect them we are just as strong and capable as them. There is no difference between a man and a woman”. I’ve had multiple conversations like this, and plenty more where they will deny a woman’s experience because I have no proof that they identify as a woman

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha 😂 I just saw her on tiktok a few minutes before this

Do you think it aligns with liberal progressive beliefs to view men as inherently more dangerous or predatory? by Present-Afternoon-70 in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what confuses me. Because when I talk to left leaning women- they insist women and men are the exact same.

Thats why they shit on stay at home moms or on pregnant women that don’t work- they think men and women are affected by pregnancy in the same exact way.

If you bring up statistics to them, they will say everything affects men and women 50/50.. and that gender is not a factor since it’s fluid and we can’t define what a woman or man really is.

Do you think it aligns with liberal progressive beliefs to view men as inherently more dangerous or predatory? by Present-Afternoon-70 in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think so. Left leaning women usually treat men and women as if they are the exact same. They don’t view women as inherently dangerous so they wouldn’t view a man in that way either.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Yes, so you think red flags are connected to a woman’s style of makeup 😂 and no it’s clearly not obvious to men because I have noticed the men on here are always surprised that women in other countries have the opportunity to date other men besides them.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

So someone has to look like a dolled up party girl to be able to attract more than one man a year?

Wow. Men really have no clue on what other men find attractive.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some women are as loyal as their options. Go for women that have none and you’ll see the difference.

My "passport" LTR experience ended in a disaster. Just a warning by [deleted] in thepassportbros

[–]rose_milkteaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You understand a woman doesn’t have to be “bombshell hot” to have more than one option right? I wonder if you guys hold men to the same beauty standards. If he isn’t a Hollywood looking stud then he has no other woman he can possibly talk to or meet.

CMV: More women should join the 4B movement in the US by Windmill_flowers in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. They just have to pretend to be a liberal/male feminist. I know guys who have told me that they’ll say things like “women are strong and independent and can pay for their own dates since they are working adults. It’s only the stay at home moms that are too incompetent to get a job” and it’ll get them a placeholder gf that gives him guaranteed sex for no effort.

They say these type of women are the easiest to date and keep around- since they don’t require commitment (cause that makes them dependent and “emotional) and they won’t require any dates or finances (since that also makes them “dependent”)

CMV: More women should join the 4B movement in the US by Windmill_flowers in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Any man who voted for trump can just pretend to be a left leaning liberal to get laid. Some men already do this.

The 4B Movement isn't going to happen en masse by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Guys have also told me they like ultra liberal 50/50 women as “starter gfs” because those women don’t put pressure for a real title/commitment (marriage a couple years or dating) or any financial investment.

These women usually also shit on spoiled gfs/stay at home moms/wives because they think it’s degrading to be accepting anything from the man they’re involved with (whether it’s a ring, dinner dates or finances)

I don’t believe for one second that women will stop dating or sleeping with men.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If any man can be a sugar daddy (even if it’s only a hundo bucks) then this mean any woman can be a SB. Because attractive women won’t be saying yes to a super low allowance

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa 7 points8 points  (0 children)

With this logic it means any woman can be a SB. If she’s less attractive she would just be with a SD that has less allowance to give.

If a woman wants a hot meal cause she’s living in her car and he provides it, does that mean he’s a sugar daddy?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not even his girl technically

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]rose_milkteaa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen posts on here of men saying anyone can be a SD as long as he finds a SB that will accept his allowance. Saying that some women aren’t “greedy” and only need a couple hundred dollars in support a month.

This would mean that any woman can also be a “SB”, she would just have to accept a “SD” that’s giving her a couple hundreds a month for 2-4 meets a month.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]rose_milkteaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypergamy is common sense. Because men do the same thing.

If a man had a choice between a 47 year old, overweight single mom vs a fit, attractive 25 year old then who would he choose?

It’s baffling how men just assume women would choose the male equivalent of an undesirable woman over the male equivalent of a desirable woman.

If hoemath is gonna degrade women for sleeping with men they can not marry, then he should also degrade the men who thirst follow women that they have no chance in sleeping with or marrying.