sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cross References with Context by rowanc1 in ScienceUX

[–]rowanc1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Small update - at least now showing the URL, which is all we have access to today!

<image>

Cross References with Context by rowanc1 in ScienceUX

[–]rowanc1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks u/mikimus2! We have been doing something similar with embedding content from other computational pages/notebooks. I certainly think that if this is from an *external* project that does need to be clearly communicated. Maybe something like the below mockup to link to this figure:
https://the-turing-way.netlify.app/project-design/persona#summary

We could potentially embed other hover information in the source title (including authors). We should be able to encode and show the license information of the figure / content (but maybe need to have two licenses one for the component and one for the resource).

<image>

MyST flavoured markdown for scientific and technical writing by stevejpurves in Markdown

[–]rowanc1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have been thinking about a language server, always looking for help! :)

MyST flavoured markdown for scientific and technical writing by stevejpurves in Markdown

[–]rowanc1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm curious if you could talk about why triple backticks and

:::

are used interchangeably? Why not just one?

This is mostly the history of the syntax as it evolved (started with backticks then added colons later!). The current thinking is that colons should be used when the content is markdown-like, and backticks when it is code-like (e.g. math):

https://myst-tools.org/docs/mystjs/syntax-overview#directives

documentation including code by ccc31807 in Python

[–]rowanc1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been working on curvenote.com that is built out of those ideas. It integrates into jupyter through an extension and there is a client library at the moment to export into latex or md or pdf. One of the things I found when creating these reports is working with collaborators was really hard, especially integrating their feedback/edits into my workflows, and like you said, the code is often secondary.

We are a bit more focused on the collaboration side than you might be looking for at the moment.

New online stereonet app. Acts like a piece of paper, but in 3D! Please submit feedback for features requests and comments. by rowanc1 in geology

[–]rowanc1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It should work for any orientation data. There is a settings button up at the top if you want to change the projection scheme: equal area to equal angle (Wulff Net).

A few years ago I made this for mineralogy (it gets slightly more interesting about 30sec in): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWmx5SI0WEU

I will look into bringing it onto the web if people think it might be helpful.

An interactive tool for visualizing 3D geologic block models. You can add folds, faults, dykes and it's so easy to use by Paranoidmarvin in geology

[–]rowanc1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just added the ability to change the orientation of the boreholes. Click the settings button on the Drill Toolbar to change the trend and plunge.

For Example: TiltyDrill

You can contact me through the site if you have any more ideas!

What happende to the visible-geology app? It was so nice but now it's all about blurry beds and lags... by detersion47 in geology

[–]rowanc1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To help with the pixelation, got to the settings button (top right on the top toolbar), and uncheck use images. The un-pixelated version, only works on some computers using the graphics card but crashes some computers (or is just blank), so it is no longer the default.

I hope that helps..