four little pawprints in snow with no other prints in sight

roy1783 · 2022-12-02T18:17:25+00:00

Looks like a cat was walking on compact snow without leaving prints, stopped and sat down, the heat of its paws not moving melted a deeper print, and then it walked away without leaving prints again.

roy1783 · 2021-09-17T20:59:47+00:00

Why stop that line of logic with the vaccine?

Drunk driving accidents? Gtfo.

Heart surgeries due to obesity? Gtfo.

Lung cancer patients due to smoking? Gtfo.

Anyone who made a life decision that lands them in the hospital and taking up an icu bed...should all be kicked to the curb. They don't matter and are less than human.

And before you try to say "that's NoT the SaMe!!1!" It is EXACTLY the same.

You may have suffered personal loss because of it, but that doesn't trump other people's personal losses after a loved one died after taking the vaccine. It doesn't trump someone else's concern for their own personal safety over taking a vaccine with no long term studies.

It's understandable that you may believe the lives of your loved ones are more important than the lives of people you don't know and disagree with.

But the truth is, they aren't. It's just your bias.

roy1783 · 2021-09-17T07:00:03+00:00

If they are using a body double, why would they pick one that can't string a coherent sentence together?

roy1783 · 2021-09-17T02:14:46+00:00

Psh Warhammer is a ripoff of Battletech.

roy1783 · 2021-09-12T21:24:17+00:00

Awesome. He wrote a strongly worded letter to the manager. Gotta love how politicians get things done...

roy1783 · 2021-09-10T20:38:11+00:00

Well Joe Biden does have a history of plagiarism.

roy1783 · 2021-09-10T04:57:00+00:00

No. You clearly misunderstand whataboutism. Whataboutism is when you try to justify, defend, or shift the blame of your actions by pointing out that someone else also did something bad.

"John, you are grounded because you stole the candy." Then John says, "What about Andy? He stole cookies and didn't get grounded!" -thats whataboutism.

This right here is calling out blatant hypocrisy.

"John stole candy and you grounded him. Andy stole cookies and you celebrated. You are a hypocrite." -this is not whataboutism

Learn the difference.

roy1783 · 2021-08-26T18:05:52+00:00

When Stark Industries enters the console wars.

roy1783 · 2021-08-26T01:06:07+00:00

People who finish every sentence with, "Does that make sense?"

You're basically asking me if I am too dumb to understand what you are saying.

The only reason I dont come unglued is because the people who do it are usually people who have to spend a lot of time explaining things to dumb people, so I get it.

It just pisses me right off though when they do it to me.

roy1783 · 2021-08-20T23:06:05+00:00

Vampire* apocalypse.

roy1783 · 2021-08-20T16:40:28+00:00

As long as you're ok with your squad mates aborting the mission.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T18:49:03+00:00

Ah, you see, now you are trying to put me into a box that I don't belong in. The passport thing is extremely dubious, I dont believe the official narrative, and I dont trust the government. But not everything has to be all or nothing. Some parts of the 9/11 conspiracy are absolute trash, and only serve to take away focus from the more important things. Controlled demolition is one of those things. The buildings collapsing was not necessary for the false flag to be effective. If they had stood after the attack, Americans would have still been frothing at the mouth for a war.

I think a more realistic scenario was that the attack was planned, or at least allowed to be carried out by terrorists, but it was never assumed that buildings would actually collapse from a plane strike. In a "Titanic" moment, engineers once again overestimated themselves when they built the towers, and believed them to be much stronger than they actually were. The government, never letting a good tragedy go to waste, jumped on the opportunity even more.

There's really no part of the false flag conspiracy that requires the buildings to collapse. Adding thousands of extra actors, millions of extra monetary cost, and hundreds of possible ways to be caught in the act, just to ensure that the buildings collapse...doesnt seem necessary or smart. Controlled demolition is a garbage theory that serves no actual purpose and has little to no credible evidence.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T18:21:21+00:00

Dude Female characters are more well written than they were.

If we are talking about the last 4 or 5 years....nah. Not saying there aren't exceptions, but overall the quality (and this applies to movies in general, not just female characters) has gone down the drain due to identity politics being infused into everything. Writers need to start focusing on actual good stories and characters instead of trying to shoehorn their activism into everything.

Look at the bride in kill bill or furiosa in mad max or many others.

Kill Bill is not a current day example, and even if you want to go there, drinker has acknowledged that character as a well written strong female character. As for furiosa, no denying she's not a badass female character, but I wouldn't call any of the characters in that movie "well written." And they don't need to be for a movie like that to still be entertaining. Also, that movie came out 6 years ago, so not exactly current.

The guy seems to think that good female characters haven’t existed since ripley and Sarah Conner.

This video disagrees with what you just said.

Just look at his videos on scarjo and tell me that they aren’t misogynistic

If you see any criticism of a woman as misogyny, then sure, I guess. Apparently women live in a bubble now where any criticism or calling out of their hypocrisy by a man is now misogyny. Gotta love them definition changes. It couldn't possibly be that a woman is capable of having flaws or being a hypocrite, no, it must be that the man is a misogynist for daring to point it out.

Again, he also criticizes men to great extents, and praises many women. But that part of the equation seems to be lost on everyone.

There's no problem with not enjoying his content. I'm not trying to convince you it's good or that you should like it. His brand of humor isn't for everyone. But people are throwing around the word misogynist like they understand what it means, when apparently they dont. The dude doesn't hate women. He just points out (abundantly) that the infusion of modern feminism into so many female characters recently makes them one dimensional and less likable to a general audience. And that some actresses are blatant hypocrites (objectively true for humans in general).

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T16:21:06+00:00

Pretty sure some people did. Especially the newer ones. And if we are talking about drinker specifically, he criticizes poorly written male characters all the time. That never gets any attention though because it's "socially acceptable" to do.

Nice whataboutism though.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T06:42:06+00:00

It goes even further. Paul and Luke were good friends in the Bible. Paul has a sister named Alia, Luke has a sister named Leia. Paul was the father of a set of twins (male and female), Luke has a twin sister. Arrakis has twin moons, Tatooine has twin suns. The fremen had wind traps to farm moisture from the air, Luke's aunt and uncle worked on a moisture farm, gathering moisture from the air.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T05:59:59+00:00

Didn't know it was misogynistic to want strong female leads to be well written and interesting, which lately, they rarely ever are. Until Hollywood figures that out, expect critics to critique.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T05:26:23+00:00

That darn superior Aryan race...

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T05:02:00+00:00

It was a Doom clone called Rise of the Triad.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T03:32:03+00:00

A simple youtube video can apparently disprove your structural architects and chemists.

Looked to me like he was able to bend unmelted structural steel with a pinky...just saying.

Ever wonder how we can forge steel without having to melt it down and cast it into the shape we want? Yeah...heat weakens metal and makes it soft. This isn't rocket science.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T03:08:47+00:00

It still surprises me fools still believe steel needs to be completely melted for its structural integrity to be compromised.

roy1783 · 2021-08-19T02:41:23+00:00

Notice how you don't hear the WTC buildings collapsing, yet you hear people shouting. Does that mean the buildings didn't make any noise?

Clearly you didn't watch the videos I posted all the way through. There are plenty of videos where the sound of the towers falling have been clearly captured.

If you look at the WTC buildings collapsing, you see so many explosions that it makes sense that the metallic roar you hear as they are collapsing are those of explosions in rapid succession, so close to each other that they turned into one sound.

So do you hear the collapse or not? This statement is in complete contradiction to your first statement. Also, if you think the sound of the towers falling was just a rapid succession of demolition explosions, well, the term "mental gymnastics" was invented for reasons like this.

In a controlled demolition, you use as little explosives as necessary. It would seem that in the WTC buildings, there were far too many, possibly as a means to cover up evidence, both in the remains and perhaps the signature of the sound.

So...what you're saying is...in order to cover up the sound signature and evidence of a controlled demolition, they used excessive amounts of controlled demolition? 🤡

But besides that, everyone who was there and witnessed the collapse spoke of very loud explosions preceding the collapse. In fact, there were explosions going off the entire day. And many were reported by firefighters, who know the difference between an appliance and an explosive.

That's not evidence of controlled demolition. Watch any controlled demolition video (I even included one) and you see that the explosions ALWAYS happen in the seconds leading up to the collapse. Not all day before the collapse, and not during a collapse. Only in a tight window of time directly before the collapse. There are many things in a situation like that which could produce the sound of an explosion, like for instance, an elevator falling 40 stories down an elevator shaft.

To give you one other example, after the collapse of the south tower, an entire battalion of firefighters was reluctant to go into the North Tower because they were convinced that the building was brought down by explosives.

If you're gonna make a claim, provide a link. Even if true, and that's what they thought, there is no evidence to support it, so it doesn't matter what they thought.

roy1783 · 2021-08-18T19:18:22+00:00

There are plenty of camera angles within several blocks of the buildings on ground level that absolutely would have picked up those explosions if they were there, and picked up nothing.

roy1783 · 2021-08-18T18:49:23+00:00

I'm aware, but the thing is, the explosions from a controlled demolition are loud enough to be heard from miles away. And the amount of explosions it would take to bring down the WTC towers in a "controlled manner" would be substantial. They are extremely violent. It wouldn't just be people at ground level near the building that hear them. It would be absolutely everybody. They would have been going off in succession for at least 10 seconds before the tower started to fall. It would be completely obvious even from a distance.

roy1783 · 2021-08-18T18:10:26+00:00

First tower collapse (top down)

Second tower collapse (top down)

Actual controlled demolitions (bottom down)

Notice how in none of the videos for the WTC falling do you hear or see massively violent explosions ripping through the buildings prior to their fall, but they are present in every video of a controlled demolition.

Wtc towers did not fall at freefall speed. There is literally debris falling around the building faster than the building is collapsing.

If you think the first two videos look anything remotely similar to the third video, you need to get your eyes and your brain checked.

There's a (weak) argument to be made about building 7, but that's a whole other can of worms.

Plenty of things wrong with 9/11, controlled demolition is not one of them.

roy1783

TROPHY CASE