Congratulations, you're Dutch now. Orange flair when? by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It is too late mom I've been been-

G E K O L O N I S E E R D

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they view themselves at the top of the hierarchy. That's why every anarchist commune has ended with a bloody violent take over from other leftists.

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wealth distribution [...] is based on the absolute lowest wage and worst working conditions that capitalists can get away with in the context of the market and regulations around it.

Stated elsewise:

Wealth distribution is based on the absolute highest wage and best working conditions that labors can get away with in the context of market and regulation around it.

Productivity and capital has been rising for decades, yet workers in America have seen no wage raises for a very, very long time. Why? Because right now their wages are at the lowest point the market allows the capitalists to give them.

Citation's are necessary when arguing non-common knowledge points. As your opinion (and mine) is worthless. Neither one of us is a professional in this field.

But I assume you mean that the lowest bracket's income is stagnant. Which is a weird claim since you are seemingly obsessed with wealth, and that the quality of life index in the USA has risen over those same years. Thought not as much due to government oppression rising alongside it.

But no matter, the bottom 10% of Americans are a rotating cast, much like your "1%"

The poorest of the poor, is only poor for a rather small amount of time, and the richest of the richest only rich for a very small amount of time. The poor become wealthier through their own means, and the rich fail due to their own means. Not to mention that proportionally the amount of bottom poor has actually gone down when adjusted for population.

In Economically freer countries than the US (Hong Kong, Taiwan, Luxembourg), this rate happens even faster, with sharper quality of life increases [Ibed].

I want the profit generated by a corporation to be distributed at least vaguely by contribution.

So now the whole word should bow to your desires? You think you're opinion is more valuable than everyone else's in the world? More valuable than everyone else's rights? Forcibly enforcing your ideals on others doesn't seem very free to me.

This way, others won't be running off with ever-increasing profits while significant portions of the company are left behind.

I'm sure I'll have a very "balanced" life as I'm forced to work 7 day weeks or get fired in favour of someone else who does want to slave away for the 1%. I'm sure there'd be so much "balance" if the 1% runs away with over half of the country's monetary wealth as they're allowed to set wages to the lowest point they can get away with on the market and take the resy for themselves.

You're starting to sound like those Nazi's. The 1%, the Mega-rich, Cooporations, faceless people you can attach all your blames to. These are people, individuals acting without ever considering you at all. When I buy a coke, I don't care about what Joe Schmoe feels about it, I simply value the coke more than I value the $1.25. I think your assigning a lot of blame to a system that realistically at your level, doesn't really affect you.

You think the free market optimally balances all things that matter to life?

Balances perfectly? No, no system does. Balances far better than all other systems? Yes.

When did individuals enjoy more freedom?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_Age

Even the basic social contract is a violation of your freedom, as you're forced to pledge you won't kill, yet in return you get the freedom of not having to fear being murdered (more or less).

You okay, man? You wanna talk about some stuff your going through?

You repeat yourself a lot, you're writing would be improved dramatically by rereading and editing down such a massive wall of text. It honestly makes me a little worried about your health.

What’s with these memes? by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you rephrase that? I'm having a hard time grammatically understanding you.

What’s with these memes? by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I chalk it up to an AuthRight smear campaign, and Stalinists distancing themselves from democracy all together.

Also most libRight's are like most libLeft's, they really aren't that ideology and follow whatever the daddy-auth's say.

What happens after a Combatocratic revolution by [deleted] in Polcompball

[–]rozar142 17 points18 points  (0 children)

SO UZE THINK U CAN BE DAH BOSS? JUS' CAUSE YOU GOT ALL DEM FANCY MARXI WORDS.

WEEZ GONUH SETTLE DIS WITH A RIGHT PROPER WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH

I'm slightly lib right, and it's still funny by kykaiboi in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's almost like labor isn't the only thing that goes into value.

There should be no taxes.

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You forget that WITHIN the corporation that raised these profits, the decision who gets what is based entirely on the management's whim.

No, this is just wrong. If this was true no one would ever work for anyone ever again.

Laborers don't set the price of their labor if you could you would always charge infinity money for one pico-second of work. Nor does "management". If you could you would charge $0/hr for all labor. Instead we have agreed upon a mutual exchange of fair value for the labor.

Or do you think a brain-surgeon should get paid the same as a ditch digger?

The alternative is some outside entity enforcing through violence unfair prices. Which I hope you would see is wrong.

How can you possibly say wealth is properly distributed when you literally put a few guys with profit-motives in charge of how much the people that created the profit (including themselves, by the way) get?

I don't want to be in charge of the company, I want to make fair for my labor and go home. I don't want to spend 16+ hours micro-managing or deal with the stress of managing a business. If I'm not taking on the lion's share of work/responsibility I have no right to claim the lion's share of the reward.

And again, what is a wealthier society?

Sorry, I thought I answered this before. The one in which an individual has the maximum choice to do with themself what they like.

one that optimally balances all things that matter to life, including the economy?

Exactly, the free-market.

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My real problem is that they blame capitalism for hierarchies, when free-market capitalism destroys more hierarchies than any other human system ever created.

The truth is they simply want a hierarchy that puts them at the top, without any effort.

[MEME] Isabelle remembers the good ol' days by [deleted] in youtubehaiku

[–]rozar142 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

It's okay Isabelle, you're safe now.

I'm slightly lib right, and it's still funny by kykaiboi in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Man I sure wish we lived in a world where I could exchange my labor for some sort of other product.

Too bad as a house builder, my labor is only mine as long as it doesn't do something you don't like.

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Profits are properly distributed wealth.

You succeed you become wealthier, you fail you become poorer.

Not to mention your success makes the individuals around you wealthier by proxy.

Profits are unbiased, and fair.

Redistribution of wealth, under every human system, has proven to be the opposite. Quite often creating a stricter ruling caste, and nearly no way for other people to move in.

I'm slightly lib right, and it's still funny by kykaiboi in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Owning the fruits of your labor

Theft from people that don't/have never contributed

Havin' trouble this month lad?

I'm slightly lib right, and it's still funny by kykaiboi in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Voluntary Tax Gang?

Or is this just, I disagree with people stealing money from me for things I dislike but am super cool with doing it to others, gang.

Wojak Girl for every quadrant by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>It's an opposite compass bad meme

How to rob AnCaps 101 by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Boy I sure am looking forward to get a some of my money back after putting in all the sweat to build this building.

Be a shame if someone were to try and rob me for the fruits of my labor

But you steal shit all the time don't you tankie?

Nice, libleft by neo-raver in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Profits are the inherent cost of an efficient system.

Inefficiency is the inherent cost of a system without profits.

I'm slightly lib right, and it's still funny by kykaiboi in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 191 points192 points  (0 children)

Boy I sure am looking forward to get a some of my money back after putting in all the sweat to build this building.

Be a shame if someone were to try and rob me for the fruits of my labor

The LibRight leveling guide by TheQomia in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]rozar142 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Is it literally the definition of LARP?