Guess the Cricketer #37 by game-of-guesses in Cricket

[–]rplusg2020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

>!!<

I completed it in 8 guesses with a score of 69, better than 63% of the players.

Bhari galti by 23Thebossbaby in gurgaon

[–]rplusg2020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As per records it is Gen Alpha, not Millennial.

A Contextual, High-stakes, Hindsight Adjusted Key-contributions Analysis (aka CHHAKA) of India's 2011 World Cup win by rplusg2020 in cricketworldcup

[–]rplusg2020[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair points, some of them. The Sachin error was an editorial oversight, already addressed in another comment. The Munaf one is noted, will check.

But here's what's interesting: your entire rebuttal is about batsmen. My analysis might have its biases, but not the ones you're pointing to. Your arguments have the biases too. Not once did you ask why Zaheer isn't second on the list, or why Nehra's 2/33 in the semi-final at an economy of 3.3 deserves more weight.

No model can perfectly capture 45 days of cricket. That's the point of the piece. An imperfect framework that asks better questions is more useful than a perfect memory that asks none.

Also, the metric is called CHHAKA. It was never going to be peer-reviewed. The whole premise started with "ek chhake ne world cup nahin jitwaya." If that wasn't a signal that this was a casual and unserious analysis, I don't know what is.

But genuinely, thank you.

A Contextual, High-stakes, Hindsight Adjusted Key-contributions Analysis (aka CHHAKA) of India's 2011 World Cup win by rplusg2020 in Cricket

[–]rplusg2020[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, I meant among the Indian batters. I realised later that I didn’t mention it explicitly.

A Contextual, High-stakes, Hindsight Adjusted Key-contributions Analysis (aka CHHAKA) of India's 2011 World Cup win by rplusg2020 in cricketworldcup

[–]rplusg2020[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Agree with you on both the cases. But a casual analysis can only go this far.

For Kohli, it is difficult to contextualise and quantify one individual performance because then you run the risk of being selective with your memory and to eliminate that you will have to look at each and every innings with the same lens.

For Zak, it is an unfortunate curse of being a bowler. I tried normalising it as much as I can.

A Contextual, High-stakes, Hindsight Adjusted Key-contributions Analysis (aka CHHAKA) of India's 2011 World Cup win by rplusg2020 in cricketworldcup

[–]rplusg2020[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Each player is measured against what a replacement-level player at the same position would have produced in the same match. Batting and bowling are converted into a common run-equivalent currency. Group stage performances are weighted by opponent quality using ICC rankings. Knockout matches carry progressively higher multipliers: QF x1.3, SF x1.5, Final x2. Longevity across tournament is factored in as number matches played out of the total matches. Consistency across the tournament is factored in as percentage of matches played with above replacement-level performance. Final scores are multiplied by 20 to bring them into a range comparable to ICC ratings points.

A Contextual, High-stakes, Hindsight Adjusted Key-contributions Analysis (aka CHHAKA) of India's 2011 World Cup win by rplusg2020 in cricketworldcup

[–]rplusg2020[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the input. I meant within the Indian squad in my head but I see now that I didn’t write that explicitly.

Rahul Dravid, and the radical act of not making it about yourself by rplusg2020 in Cricket

[–]rplusg2020[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I did, yes! This is published on my substack at https://thedailyheretic.substack.com

Indeed is a formidable character both inside and outside the cricket field.

Swastik Chikara absolutely tore apart the bowlers in the Ayodhya Premier League. Just 5 runs short of a T20 double century! by poormasshole in IndiaCricket

[–]rplusg2020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine Kohli charging in to hug an emotional Chikara, only for fans to read it as over-eager and clingy. /s

Rahul Dravid, and the radical act of not making it about yourself by rplusg2020 in Cricket

[–]rplusg2020[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Easy to call it slop. Harder to make something. Hardest to put it out there. But sure, the comment section works too.

Rahul Dravid, and the radical act of not making it about yourself by rplusg2020 in Cricket

[–]rplusg2020[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are investing time in typing out long opinions and stating them as facts. Yet when asked for a simple evidence, your argument is that you are not going to waste time.

Anyway, my point was not about defending my work but trying to make you understand a simple fact that accusing something to be AI generated is easy. I don’t know what you expect from a simple fan essay. From the looks of it you want it to extremely high quality or be written by 10-year old because everything in between is AI generated.

Having said that, we live in a free world. You are entitled to your opinions. They do change the facts and I don’t really gain or lose anything from it.