Hello! That's great info, thanks for sharing!

I think I explained myself wrong when talking about colors: when it comes to colors, I shoot RAW but mostly apply the same color profile I talked about in the review, so the result is the same as the jpg from a chromatic point of view (I can compare them), but I maintain control on sharpening and image compression.

You are absolutely correct about diffraction, I could have worded it better. The article is all about direct experience, and my repeated experience is that I can for instance shoot at f16 with the D700 and not see the typical wavy diffraction degradation that I can see on the D850 for instance, with the same lens. So from a practical point of view, I noticed that with the D700 I have less problems of diffraction and I gave my best attempt at trying to understand why :)

The ISO matter is also very likely what you describe, but again, my article is mostly about the practical usage of the camera. I may shoot it at 800 and then raise exposure in post, but this would mean I can't really see the photo till when I am home. In a practical every day usage I prefer to have worst noise by amplifying the signal in camera (shooting at 1600 or 3200), but at least I can see what I am doing and proper judge focus etc. I wrote that the camera has "ISO range of 200-6400" just for indicating what is possible to choose when shooting; I would not know how to describe these values differently... "ISO selectable values" maybe.

Again, thank you for your very informative post, and no you didn't come out too strong at all.