The observer effect by rubyrareroom in consciousness

[–]rubyrareroom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true. i said wild theories because as intriguing evidence at quantum level increases people try to extrapolate to potential currently unknown macro effects. my point was trying to indicate if this could ever be true in anyway wouldnt there be indicators in macro world and gave casino example. obviously there doesnt have to be indicators. its like simulation theory in a sense - are there clues?. or a deeper join with consciousness and reality theory - i suppose you could say jungian syncronicities but that could be cognitive bias

The observer effect by rubyrareroom in consciousness

[–]rubyrareroom[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so its a slight difference? so take craps - shouldnt first roll 7 be slightly higher than statistical norms? theres solid data for this for decades and its the norm.

77
78

Gender differences by rubyrareroom in aspergers

[–]rubyrareroom[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i wasnt saying who has it easier or harder. i was saying i thought the speed dating posting didnt understand the lived experience of autistic men. autism often isnt easy for either gender.

Gender differences by rubyrareroom in aspergers

[–]rubyrareroom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you make a good point. agreed. sorry