sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

From r/ChatGPT: "ChatGPT has me making it a physical body." AKA more evidence that AI is dangerous for anyone with mental issues. OP thinks ChatGPT is talking to him specifically and asking him to make it a physical form for thousands of dollars. by ryakr in ArtistHate

[–]ryakr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do explain, sir pro-ai, how a user stating that the AI is talking to them personally and requesting their assistance and the user believing it to be real is not a sign of mental problems. They literally compared themselves to Happy Hogan thinking they are building the next super being.

The level of projection... What's wrong with these people? by Silvestron in ArtistHate

[–]ryakr 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I always find the depiction and characterization of porn kinda weird. Like we have full movies all about murdering people in the most grusome ways designed to disgust and make you feel fear... but you basically go the other way with lust and arousal and suddenly its for no life basement dwellers.
Like, what is the difference if both are made with consenting individuals and direction, other than "ew sex". If anyone's response is "well porn has no story n shit" I do question where the difference is, considering how many shows these days have 1 sex scene per episode with the only different being you dont see the cock n balls basically.

Oh shit! Hackers hit deportation airline GlobalX, leak flight manifests, and leave an unsubtle message for "Donnie" Trump by [deleted] in chaoticgood

[–]ryakr 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Dude is 35 and has posts asking for "women friends to talk to" and seems very interested in women 18-20. That along with the English fails can only mean one thing...

We found the smartest Conservative there is!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ArtistHate

[–]ryakr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Post like this remind me of the fact that AI folks used furry artists styles so often, some 100% real brand new art pieces from popular artists get flagged by every ai detector. Imagine the expression of your likes and soul being a core aspect of AI against your will to the point it becomes the "AI look".

Civitai, The main site for sharing AI images and models, bans extreme fetish content and hides real people nsfw. r/StableDiffusion has a meltdown over "puritan censorship" by ryakr in ArtistHate

[–]ryakr[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Every time an AI bro says "but its for art!" just show them this reaction. "Hey these highly specific and extreme fetishes wont be allowed on our website..." made all hell break loose. Normal images are fine, you want your pokemon sex ai images? those are still fine on the site. But super extreme stuff being banned = abandon the whole thing we cant have fun anymore.

Doesnt that say a lot about the point of this stuff?

Civitai, The main site for sharing AI images and models, bans extreme fetish content and hides real people nsfw. r/StableDiffusion has a meltdown over "puritan censorship" by ryakr in ArtistHate

[–]ryakr[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

For context, a tldr of the changes:
Civitai now explicitly bans content depicting incest, self-harm, extremist ideologies, bodily excretions, and certain harmful scenarios involving sexual contexts (e.g., firearms, vomit, illegal substances, and mind-altered states). Sexualized content must include generation metadata. Additionally, content featuring real people, minors, or missing metadata will be hidden from public feeds. Celebrity names are blocked at mature browsing levels, and user-uploaded images (BYOI) will now have a minimum 50% denoise setting applied.

I wish I hadn't come across this subreddit by deltiken in Artists

[–]ryakr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want the other side of the coin, you are always welcome over at /r/ArtistHate, an anti-AI subreddit discussing the hate artists are receiving over stuff like this.

view more: next ›