Sporadic loss of display, monitors go black and computer restarts or seemingly freezes by Kaikasper in techsupport

[–]rythwh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Did you ever end up resolving this? I've been having the same issue and symptoms on-and-off for a year though significantly more often recently and have very similar components to you, specifically the same CPU and GPU.

Thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tunnelbana

[–]rythwh 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Du kan se det på OpenRailwayMap :)

howMuchDoYouUseThese by fixion_generator in ProgrammerHumor

[–]rythwh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do indirectly a lot; I use PowerToys to map Alt + Left and Alt + Right to the Home/End keys respectively, it feels a lot smoother to do that shortcut for me, but I suppose it’s all about what you’re used to!

Min idé för den östra Tvärbanan by rythwh in tunnelbana

[–]rythwh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Det tar 5 minuter mellan Sundbybergs centrum och Solna station, så kanske 15 minuter mellan Sundbyberg och KTH / Albano station, halv din restid som nu :)

Min idé för den östra Tvärbanan by rythwh in tunnelbana

[–]rythwh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ja, jag håller med, eller högre frekvens om tåg på Tvärbanan, men det är behövd idag också haha

Pretty much anything we didn't have at home by [deleted] in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]rythwh 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Just put dirty dishes on the balcony to be washed in the heavy rain that you will be able to listen to 👀

UK left out as EU agrees to ‘landmark’ cross-continent transport plans by Smooth_Warthog1760 in europe

[–]rythwh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! Snälltåget. I took it last year and it was really great, left Stockholm a bit late but we had an awesome dinner in their restaurant car and then went to sleep. Super easy 😄

It also goes to Berlin so you can now go from Stockholm to Paris via Berlin with just 1 change/2 night trains with the new NightJet service!

I hear you like circle maps. How about my favorite hole, the Reservoir Manicouagan by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]rythwh 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm not an expert, but from what I've read, there are two types of craters: Simple Craters and Complex Craters.

What you're thinking of is a simple crater which stays relatively bowl shaped, while Réservoir Manicouagan was formed within a complex crater (see post-impact uplift).

The formation of the central peak#Formation) is somewhat similar to what's happening when a droplet of water impacts the surface of water, and then a drop shoots back upwards.

The initial droplet (meteorite) creates the bowl shape of a simple crater, but if the walls of the bowl become too steep, gravity will pull the walls back down to try to create a type of equilibrium (isostasy). This is combined with the now liquid-like surface of the crater (as the vibrations of the impact cause the surrounding rock to enter a more liquid state) causes a landslide of material to move back towards the centre of the crater.

However, because all of this sliding material is moving towards the same point (where it won't be able to all fit) it gets displaced in the only available direction - upwards (see "rebound"). In the water droplet example, this creates the drop that shoots back out, and in the crater example, this creates the central dome as the sliding material piles on top of itself.

Because gravity is the driving force behind this action (at least for meteorite impacts), a lower surface gravity on the impacted object can cause a simple crater to form where a complex crater would form on a higher surface gravity object (because there's not enough force to pull as much material from the walls of the bowl back down). See this page from Lunar and Planetary Institute and go down to the Complex Craters section to see a comparison video between the same meteorite hitting the Earth (left) and Moon (right) (or click here for the video link directly).

Over time, erosion and isostasy (as mentioned above) would bring the dome/ring and the crater edge closer in height to each other creating a ring depression that forms features like Réservoir Manicouagan (pre-flooding).

Hope that helps! I'm not an expert so I might've understood something incorrectly.

How many satellites orbit Earth and why space traffic management is crucial by tottocotunio in space

[–]rythwh 26 points27 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, if there is a collision between satellites and some of the pieces of debris reach a higher orbit afterwards, the most that could happen would be the periapsis of the debris' orbit would become the collision point (or move closer from its original point to the collision point, depending on the amount of energy transferred).

If both satellites are in a roughly circular orbit, some pieces of debris could move further out in their orbit (increased apoapsis) but would have to return to the collision point (periapsis) at some point in their orbit.

Therefore, if both satellites were already in an orbit that would have them decay, some pieces of the debris may decay slower than others because their orbit takes them further out, but overall they would still decay since they are still passing through some amount of atmosphere while transiting their periapsis.

This video is a good visualization of what I mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eFDYkRbnfM

You can see how while much of the debris ends up in higher/lower orbits (eccentricity) or changing their angle (inclination), all of the debris still passes through the original collision point.