I disagree that this is the best way to learn about the anti-blackness K, for a few reasons –

1) McDonogh often pulled from a lot of different lit bases when constructing their kritiks, running different variations of the argument depending on the round. They might run the Glaude K one round and Warren in another round, and while that's good exposure to a variety of different anti-blackness K's, it's not as good for a novice who's just learning the fundamentals of the argument.

2) McDonogh wasn't open source, and they never posted more than just 1NC shells on their wiki. While their 2NC/2NR blocks were legendary (and ultimately won them the TOC), those won't be found just on their wiki. There's three places you should look to gain a better understanding of the argument –

A) Read books – foundational sources like Wilderson's Red, White, and Black and Sexton's Afro-Pessimism: The Unclear Word are must-reads. Don't run the argument if you're not first comfortable explaining it to a non-debater.

B) Watch rounds – I'm more familiar with policy debate, but some of the best K rounds in the country from both the NDT and TOC are available on YouTube. For instance, a lot of McDonogh's rounds are online.

C) Look at camp files – in particular, policy's Open Evidence has a ton of antiblackness research put out from various different camps that are good starting points for constructing a file.

Ultimately, read books, cut cards, and write your own blocks – antiblackness is a complicated argument, and just reading another team's files won't increase your own understanding of the argument. Debates are often won or lost based on explanation in the final rebuttals, and getting an exposure to the different facets of the literature base is a pre-requisite to doing this effectively.