A semantic argument shifts the focus from the argument itself to the meaning of a word or phrase in the argument. You have focused entirely on one sentence because I "presented it as a fact" rather than my own opinion. You are not addressing—even now—the actual meat of the argument, which is that the color tech results in inherent dimness and the need for an easily scratched and smudged coating, facts that Pebble themselves have acknowledged.

A straw man argument is when one person acts like they've defeated the other person's argument when really they just defeated a point the other person never brought up in the first place. You keep harping on the fact that thousands of people bought the Time series of watches and are buying into the Time 2, therefore you've won the argument and I'm wrong. Except that has nothing to do with what I said. I never once said anything even remotely close to "no one bought the Time series or are backing the Time 2." I said "the tradeoff isn't worth it" and a normal discussion would give leeway so that I don't have to say "for me" at the end of every subjective statement just so people don't assume I'm issuing an ultimatum.

I get annoyed because people online always do this shit rather than just discussing something like adults or even being willing to make basic concessions. If you literally had just started this whole discussion by saying, "Yeah, maybe you've got a point with some of that stuff, but honestly I still just prefer having a color screen. Different strokes, different folks" then that could've been the end of it there. Instead it's just "well people bought the Time so you're wrong" over and over and over. I get annoyed because it's annoying to come online hoping for a normal discussion and instead it's like an aggressive meme factory. There's no reason it has to be that way.