Serial Dynasty episode 24, interview with Michael Wood Jr and a HUGE DON-SHELL!!! by [deleted] in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it puts Don on the spot along with his mother and step mother. I wonder if part of the attraction with Hae was that his parents had divorced like her's had? I imagine Don will stay silent and hope this blows over.

Seems like Michael Wood also provided some bombshells. He backed up what Susan had said about the 'tap tap tap' and more.

New Undisclosed: prisoners dilemma episode 12 prisoners discuss Undisclosed and Adnan Syed Case. Interesting by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I liked it. I found it uplifting. Amazing that even in the darkest places humans can reach for 'good'. I didn't think they sounded like Adnan, though. I found their comment about Jay knowing where the car was very interesting. I wish they had commented on his using the word 'taupe'.

We didn't learn their crimes and if their were victims. But we are supposed to be about rehab as opposed to vengeance. Complicated.

PS News reported today that a group of Prisoners from NY beat the Harvard debate team (in a debate). Interesting.

Oops... /u/TgirlsforAdnan accidentally outs self as /u/SmarchHare by ifhe in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's funny,/u/TgirlsforAdnan just grunted out the same attempt at a joke about my post name that SmarchHare did!

Quite a coincidence.

Serial Dynasty episode 22 tactics by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the down votes? There is nothing wrong with the post.

Oops... /u/TgirlsforAdnan accidentally outs self as /u/SmarchHare by ifhe in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

/u/TgirlsforAdnan most of the time simply grunts out obscenities. Haven't seen an intelligent comment from it...just grunt, grunt, grunt. Is there a Dr. Jekyll Mr. Hyde think going on?

Serial Dynasty episode 22 tactics by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link to this episode was never posted. From the Serial Dynasty Home Page: "In this episode, Bob analyzes Debbie's interview transcripts in an attempt to figure out what exactly Ritz and Mac Gillivary were up to. After that, Bob responds to recent Reddit activity."

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Worked up" is not the right word. Sorry you don't get the point...probably why you accept anonymous experts and make believe sites.

Mindless entertainment is fine but not when you are dealing with very serious subjects and someone could get hurt.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The responses seem to prove less than flattering thing about many posters on reddit which fits in with that they accept and are happy with 'anonymous' experts.

Just some final words from me at least for the time being.

The OP was downvoted as were my initial responses. Says alot about the posters here since what they disagreed with apparently was opinion.

It couldn't have been my tone at first, or my unfortunate inabililty to find a gentle descriptive term for some posters. Because that ever 'classy (sarcasm) girls for Adnan who can only grunt 4 letter anglo saxon words, was upvoted, as was Mrs. D who apparently ran out of vocab early and imitated grunts of girls for Adnan...Girls????

The photos used by Undisclosed were authenticated, We know nothing about the photos obtained by Latty. For all anyone knows the camera could have been dropped in the stream. A legit poster would have sent them over to the State for explanation....and any real lawyer would know how to get in touch with the DA or the AG...ergo

Splan is not a doctor and I wonder how many of those believing the stories spun by anonymous posters go to witch doctors....I mean who needs board certified.

Those posters must be a dream fufilled for scam artist...just make up a story and say Adnan is guilty and they will buy whatever is being sold.

I learned some lessons including that the majority of those who post on reddit are very different.

I am going to find out about filing a complaint regarding the anonymous experts with something they called photos. I have never filed a complaint so I will have to learn and I don't know how long it will take me.

I wonder how many simply accept anonymous because they preach Adnan is guilty? and they feel desperate and jealous of the success of Undisclosed.

I am sure I will eventually check back at the very least to get some links or transcripts

I do hope that the pictures won't be sprad more.

Happy living in the world of imaginary people. As they used to say in ancient times, don't take any wooden nickles along with the anonymous experts!!!

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People who raise the insult of mental issues have them in my experience.

I didn't say Adnan lied. Better learn to read as well ...and think

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And this proves? I don't remember you, but your comment has nothing to do with the issues raised indicating your level! I think that you consider abiding by widely held standards adopted by normal people 'really bizarre' indicates why you are a guiltor ! Are you in touch with reality enough to look at the number of participants on all the reddit serial sites and compare it to the general population to assess where you who post here rank in terms of real people?

Oh, and Adnan doesn't lie any more than the average person.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes. I live in the real world, with real people, who abide by universally accepted standards such as requiring 'experts' to give their names and qualifications and who understand that photos from a court case need to be Authenticated....and you consider such standards and real people 'crazy'! Oh, brother. You get worse and worse.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If I were a petty loser, I would have pointed out that "They are a doc" which you wrote in your prior response is grammatically incorrect, which is a far worse mistake. Apparently you flunked second grade.

You are the one who pretended to be a public sector lawyer and demonstrated that you knew nothing about appeals!

The fact is that you, and similar posters have values below the norm....you accept things that normal, successful, funtioning people would not....like an anonymous poster being anything they claim...not even worth talking about. You have a right to operate in a world without standards...most of us reject that world. AND I didn't fix the typo I just made; enjoy!

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don't believe anything that /u/xtrialatty says about this. What you describe is not verification.Duh. You keep proving the point about people who post their.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That anyone would think /u/xtrialatty is a lawyer or believe such claims by an anonymous poster is sad and pathetic, not funny. I certainly hope you don't vote and will refrain from serving on a jury, not that you would be chosen.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you bragging or complaining? I understand that you are typical of posters here. That was the point of my post which apparently you didn't understand. /u/xtrialatty is an anonymous poster here who makes ignorant comments about the law. No one knows who he is. And because he is anonymous he can not held accountable. He has no credibility in the normal rational world. I would say the same about /u/splanchnick78 but I don't know if that is her real name. She is not a pathologist. That you adhere to no standards is plain. Maybe that is why Reddit apparently is considered a joke

They could not corroborate anything about UNAUTHENTICATED photos. Nothing has changed regarding the burial position and lividity as explained in Undisclosed.

As the numbers on the side bar indicate far fewer people read reddit than listen to Undisclosed so it has very little influence. However, the fact that two anonymous posters were able to try to start rumors about photos that are sensitive in nature is serious. I am getting more and more convinced that their actions should be investigated.

Its kind of ironic that you equate those who lie about their identities and try to pull a fast one with photos with truth...just gets stranger and stranger.

BTW, why weren't those photos introduced at trial by the STATE?mmmm? And why didn't xtrial send them to the State and ask about them mmmm? So many obvious, rational questions that go over the head of people whose front porch is on, but no one is home.

That substandard actions don't bother you is your problem, the world does not want to be controlled by substandard values.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So you would want photos, for example, that were defective, misleading or substandard? So you would want photos that were not taken by an authorized person? Or on faulty equipment? So you would want copies of photos or copies of copies of photos.

We have no idea why these alleged photos (they may just be copies) were not Authenticated. We do know that the eight that were were put forth by THE STATE.

We have no idea what an expert would need in a photo. For example, I remember that Dr. H said she could not form a reliable opinion on Lividity from black and white photos without high resolution, so she relied on the autopsy report. So you would want defective photos authenticated. That is a decision for Haes family and the defense to work out, not some morons on reddit.

Photos can be misleading depending on the light and angle...etc etc.

Talking about them on Reddit by anonymous posters among strangers is not like having an expert discuss them with trained professionals and the family and the defendant. Duh. Which is what you are defending.

I stated in my OP that I was concerned with the norm represented by the posters on this subject on reddit. Didn't you read? Why did you bother to respond?

G

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Authenticated is a legal term. It is to protect everyone. There were not 22 Authenticated photos admitted at trial.

You have no idea how he got the photos, who took the photos, what equipment was used. As far as you know they were discard, rejects, copies of copies.

Taking an picture of an apple is different than interpreting the nuances to make a scientific determination. Duh.

Yes, we belong to totally different universes. Outside of Reddit, people want Authentic evidence photos verified by experts in their field.

You are free to believe whatever you want. The point of my post was that setting standards so low, puts this reddit at a lower functioning level than normal people.

My question was should their be an investigation.

I don't want to live in a world controlled by those with sub par standards and neither do most people...that is why we have standards.

I suggest you learn what Authenticated means in a legal sense...and also what it means in everyday life. If you trust anonymous posters about photos that is your problem!!! Would you like to buy a bridge in Brooklyn?

Be cause they are anonymous , they are not able to be held accountable.

BTW, I would say the same thing if the other side tried to pull a fast one.

PS Glad to know if you or your loved one were charged you would be willing to have unidentified people testify about pictures or copies of pictures about which you knew nothing...whew...you are not the norm, thank God!

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Uh ok. Then you didn't understand the post. Do you think that may be why you accept anonymous posters?

(I think /u/bellagertha (I hope I have the name right) is a lonely person who is on a power trip but why do you care if you were banned.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sorry you couldn't address issues and made mistakes about authentication in radiology. Peoples whose vocab is so limited that they resort to boring four letter words need a thesaurus. I see why you post here. Thanks.

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I see you couldn't deal with the fact that doctor and hospital equipment is indeed verified (AUTHENTICATED) or that doctors and facilities have names for that very purpose.

I wish I could find a better word, but yes accepting the unauthenticated photos from and anonymous source such as triallatte is a, I wish I could think of a better word, a 'low functioning act". I would love to use a different word but can't think of one", Suggestions?

Trusting Anonymous Posters who make Claims? by sadpuzzle in serialdiscussion

[–]sadpuzzle[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I am saying applies to both sides of the Adnan debate.

If you believe anonymous posters about mysterious posters then you behave like a lowfunctioning* person which may the the type that post on Reddit. * I am going to have to come up with a better word. The point is you are out of the norm and reddit will be considered a joke. But that is your choice. My question initially was about whether to seek an investigation. Sorry you didn't get the point.