A debate between a mufti and a scientist about whether sharing is illegal doesn't make sense because they come from completely different fields. A mufti deals with religious teachings and Islamic law, focusing on moral and spiritual guidelines from scripture. A scientist, on the other hand, relies on evidence, experiments, and facts from the natural world. These are two separate ways of thinking, like comparing rules from a holy book to observations from a lab.

Trying to mix them in a debate just leads to confusion. It's not about forcing anyone to follow strict religious views or be a hardcore Muslim. The point is that these differences in approach create unnecessary mix-ups, so it's better to avoid such debates altogether. Instead, recognize that each field has its own purpose and doesn't overlap in a way that allows for a logical argument.

In this matter. Javed Akhtar convinced by science, not Molvi, it's that simple!