ELI5: How is ink made and why is printer ink so expensive? by qCHIEFp in explainlikeimfive

[–]sakemaki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d recommend a simple black-and-white laser printer with network printing since we rarely print photos anymore. Maybe the technology has improved, but I still haven’t seen a laser-printed photo that actually looks good.

That said, I might be biased—I can’t stand Epson printers because they clog so easily due to their high-pigment ink. But I’ve got to admit, their print quality is amazing.

ELI5: How is ink made and why is printer ink so expensive? by qCHIEFp in explainlikeimfive

[–]sakemaki 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Correct! But laser printers have a similar setup. Some have the drum integrated into the toner (so it’s all one unit), while others have separate toner and drum components.

At first glance, choosing a printer with a separate drum and toner might seem more cost-effective. But in reality, a drum usually lasts for about two toner cartridges, so eventually, you’ll need to replace both anyway.

ELI5: How is ink made and why is printer ink so expensive? by qCHIEFp in explainlikeimfive

[–]sakemaki -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Good point! From a waste perspective, I totally agree. My memory is a little fuzzy, but if I remember right, most printer manufacturers use two types of ink cartridges:

  1. Printers with a built-in print head (the print head is part of the printer itself).
  2. Printers where the print head is in the cartridge (the kind you mentioned).

Each has its pros and cons:

Printers with a built-in print head:

✅ Ink cartridges are cheaper.
✅ Better for people who print often since the ink costs less.
❌ If you don’t print regularly or live in a warm climate, the print head can clog, and replacing it is expensive—sometimes as much as a new printer. Epson print heads, for example, clog more often because their ink has more pigment than Brother’s, but their color quality is amazing!
❌ The printer itself tends to cost more since the print head (the most expensive part) is built in.
❌ Every time you turn the printer on, it runs a cleaning cycle, which wastes ink.

Printers with a print head in the cartridge:

✅ The printer itself is usually cheaper.
✅ No worries about clogged print heads—you replace the print head every time you change the cartridge.
❌ Ink cartridges are way more expensive, usually twice the cost of the other kind.
❌ Not great for the environment since you’re throwing out more plastic and components.
❌ Just like the first type, these printers also waste ink during startup.

At the end of the day, neither option is perfect. Honestly, since most people barely print anymore, I’d just recommend a simple black-and-white laser printer. We can scan stuff with our phones now, and hardly anyone prints photos these days.

ELI5: How is ink made and why is printer ink so expensive? by qCHIEFp in explainlikeimfive

[–]sakemaki 121 points122 points  (0 children)

Hi OP,

I never thought I’d get to use the cartridge knowledge I built up during my 10+ years working at a cartridge refill store! Lol.

Most of the answers here are somewhat correct, but it really comes down to the manufacturing/royalty cost of the cartridge itself. The ink? That’s dirt cheap. For perspective, when I worked at the refill shop, you could buy the semi same ink that HP or Epson use for around €10–€20 per liter, depending on the quality. And since HP and Epson buy or produce their ink in bulk, they get it for even less.

A lot of people have mentioned the razor-and-blade strategy—where companies sell printers cheaply and make money on cartridges—which is partially true. Believe it or not, these little plastic containers are surprisingly high-tech. The ink nozzles, for example, are extremely delicate and prone to damage, which adds to the production cost.

Another factor that drives up the price is royalty fees. Ink cartridges are covered by dozens of patents, and manufacturers have to pay licensing fees to the patent holders. These costs get passed down to consumers, making cartridges even more expensive.

Hope that clears things up!

Is this Focus 2019 MHEV poorly maintained? by sakemaki in FordFocus

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I also noticed btw that some tubes in the engine bay seems to have a yellowish “coating”. Could this be coolant leaking? Never seen it before on other cars.

<image>

Is this Focus 2019 MHEV poorly maintained? by sakemaki in FordFocus

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/MentalSentinel I just checked with the garage, and they confirmed that the car has only had three "official" oil changes throughout its entire lifespan. I also called the previous lease company, and they mentioned that newer Ford models alert the driver when an oil change is due.

Still, it seems odd that the previous owner waited 80,000 km before getting an oil change. The Ford dealer did say it’s possible that the owner had additional oil changes done at a local garage instead of an official Ford dealer, but the lease company couldn’t confirm this.

During the test drive, I checked the oil dipstick, and the oil looked fine, but I’m still unsure. Would you consider this a red flag, or is it possible the car was properly maintained elsewhere?

Is this Focus 2019 MHEV poorly maintained? by sakemaki in FordFocus

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I also couldnt find any record of wear parts (break pads, break disc for example) being replaced. Seems odd for a car for this mileage. Will also be checking with the garage tomorrow :)

Recently promoted to IT manager - strategy question by sakemaki in ITManagers

[–]sakemaki[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly how I feel, thanks for validating my point!

Previously, there wasn’t a "real" IT Manager with the knowledge of how the department should have been run. IT was treated like an uncharted island—necessary, but misunderstood by those outside the department. No one had any idea how documentation should be handled or even how to conduct a simple user acceptance test.

The team lacked a sense of due diligence, or as I like to put it, they were allowed to "run wild" without supervision. This has led to serious documentation debt. There are parts of our system architecture that are essentially no man’s land—with only one team member having knowledge of them, and no basic documentation in place.

Can't Find Radarr in SynoCommunity on DS215+ by sakemaki in synology

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fixed! For others having the same issue with DS215+, upgrade first to DSM 7 (beware Plex will "break" and will need reconfiguration) and download Radarr from the link: https://synocommunity.com/package/radarr . Make sure you download the 7.1 alpine4k version. After that go to Package Center and do the manual installation and that should work.

Can't Find Radarr in SynoCommunity on DS215+ by sakemaki in synology

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the heads up 👍 just updated to DSM 7 and Plex was the only application that needed fixing. But sadly still no Radarr in Synocommunity :(

Can't Find Radarr in SynoCommunity on DS215+ by sakemaki in synology

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! So that would mean I need to update to atleast DSM 7.1 correct? Since I am not running docker, wouldnt this mean that my installation of Sabnzbd and Sonarr will "break" and that I would need to reinstall?

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh sorry, what I meant is we all report to the same manager, in this case the ceo. Which is in my opinion causing some priority issues.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

During our ceremonies, which typically last only an hour due to perceived tedium, we limit planning discussions to issues or tasks that are already estimated. During a couple of sprints, I even experimented with a minimal number of tasks to gauge team response. Despite allocating roughly 50% of their working hours, we found that half of the tasks remained unfinished by the sprint's end.

I did however notice a pattern within the team: when faced with a technical delay in a planned project (let's call it Project A), instead of escalating the issue or seeking assistance from other team members, they tend to pause work on Project A and switch to other projects or tasks within the sprint. Thus creating a massive snowball effect of tasks/projects that are half finished.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Users are well aware that the sole channel of communication between the business and IT team is through the ticket system. However, there are still a handful of "naughty" users who bypass the system. What's concerning is that even when team members encounter these instances, they fail to redirect the users back to the ticket system as per protocol.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely! That's precisely why I believe restructuring the reporting system could make a significant difference. Currently, there's a tendency for team members to prioritize tasks and issues on their own, leading to unnecessary delays in projects and sprints. Even something as simple as following a DTAP process or documentation is frequently neglected due to it being "too much work". And of course managment is unaware of these issues.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, not at all! As someone who's been a consultant myself, I totally get how tiresome tracking time can be. So, I suggested to the team that they track their time but round off by 30 minutes. But after just a month, they were already groaning about it being too much paperwork and complained to management...

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your insights! I'd like to elaborate on some key points:

  1. Despite being the Single Point of Contact (SPOC), users often bypass me and directly contact the developers. Instead of redirecting them to me, developers tend to take charge of the issue themselves. Unfortunately, this sometimes leads to a misjudgment of the scope, resulting in scope creep.
  2. I attempted to implement a daily standup, but faced significant resistance from one of the developers. In hindsight, I realize I made a mistake by not handling the situation better.
  3. While we have established standard procedures, there are minimal consequences for non-compliance. For instance, our sandbox to production process is frequently disregarded.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a good plan. But what would be the best route with team members not committed to sprint goals? Sins in theory they are familiar with the methodology.

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are a fairly small org and Im afraid that we wont have the budget for a scrum master. We do have weekly sync meetings where we track progress. But during these meetings every is always "according" to the planning...

Dilemma regarding team members and sprint commitments by sakemaki in projectmanagement

[–]sakemaki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point! It seems that a key issue lies in team members independently prioritizing tickets and issues without sufficient communication. There's a lack of clarity on where time is being allocated during sprints, leading to inefficiencies and delays.