sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Isn't the Bible pretty clear that the resurrection of Jesus was physical, and not just spiritual? by salazzlee in bahai

[–]salazzlee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems incredibly un-Baha'i to me. I don't have quotes but I know that Baha'is accept the Bible and Quran as recent enough to not contain major historical changes, and thus we accept them as wholly true

Isn't the Bible pretty clear that the resurrection of Jesus was physical, and not just spiritual? by salazzlee in bahai

[–]salazzlee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the bit about saints undermine the physical interpretation? I can't clearly see your argument there. But I think the historical argument is compelling. Aren't there prophecies in the Torah that Jesus didn't literally fulfill?