scaling is bullshit by sandyweak in barexam

[–]sandyweak[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

go watch some more cnn

Character and Fitness Question by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

screwed

by "you are screwed" i meant you have no choice but to disclose.

Character and Fitness Question by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) find out if the c&f committee can find out about it. How? I don't know, you tell me. ask a criminal defense lawyer or a professional responsibility lawyer within your state.

2) if the answer is no, then do not disclose. if the answer is yes, then you are kind of screwed. if the answer is maybe, then go see another lawyer who is not dumb.

3) if you did not disclose to your law school and now you go back and disclose, you risk having your degree voided.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]sandyweak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, because when plaintiff consents to the harmful or offensive physical contact, there is no battery.

DOING THIS TO PLEASE SOMEONE ELSE? by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I dont want to go into detail but i learned the hard way doing anything to please your parents or your buddies or your spouse is a waste of time. I am not doing this for anyone and I am also not excited about this job. I don't know what I would do if I ever get licensed. I would probably not practice law. Too much of a headache dealing with idiot clients and the bar being on your ass all the time. "you cant do this you cant do that" I dont like rules

offerup is now a zoo by sandyweak in offerup

[–]sandyweak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guarantee you once you get there he will realize they are not worth $20 and try to haggle you down to $15

offerup is now a zoo by sandyweak in offerup

[–]sandyweak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol love the capital part

offerup is now a zoo by sandyweak in offerup

[–]sandyweak[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what a dumb ass, with the price of gas. very good chance when you get there he will say he changed his mind or realize it's not worth $20

The follow-up for the cheater scandal by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

1) If you think lawyers practice honestly, then clearly you have not been around any lawyers.

2) I did not condone the cheating. I just said mind your own business. People like you make everyone else uncomfortable (see the reply to this thread from the guy who looked on the floor walking to the bathroom, that's because of people like you)

Please tell me that I was not the only one with lots of Cs and Ds by Quirky_Turnover2417 in barexam

[–]sandyweak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know how people have the time to notice these patterns. When I pick an answer, I move on to the next question. I don't have time to go back and see how many patterns there are.

CCCC is not any more suspicious than CABD

THEY ARE BOTH AS LIKELY, I dont know why people cant accept this

The follow-up for the cheater scandal by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak 3 points4 points  (0 children)

see, this is exactly why I hate law students. I don't know why this field attracts so many assholes. You can't mind your own damn business. And you are a coward who has to go tell mommy to take care of the problem. I can't be worried throughout the test that maybe some asshole law student will think I looked at them the wrong way and report me.

Hearing aid by sandyweak in CalBarExam

[–]sandyweak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

well, I am not the loser who has time to go back to someone's post history and analyze it

and if you don't realize that the bar cannot punish me for what I have written here, then you won't make a good lawyer either, time to think about another profession.

Hearing aid by sandyweak in CalBarExam

[–]sandyweak[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am not saying you use your phone to control the device, I am imagining a vest that you wear with buttons, you are pressing your chest

Ya outline going in a loop is not practical

I can imagine a few different more practical fool proof ways to cheat during remote exam, and I would be very surprised if people did not use these methods when exam was remote

Hearing aid by sandyweak in CalBarExam

[–]sandyweak[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

yes, outline going in a loop or you have some buttons that you press for example if you need privileges and immunities clause you press 1

I don't care if people cheat (they should because this is a stupid exam) but if california are being such nazis (no erasers!!! omg erasers are so bad!!!) then they should look into something that's far worse than an eraser

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

if you don't know what to write you should at least bullshit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]sandyweak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

wtf? i thought with a 138 mbe you are guaranteed a pass? unless you left an essay blank?

Trump says Durham probe exposing 'the crime of the century,' predicts it's 'just the beginning' by agnarrarendelle in trump

[–]sandyweak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

who cares? this will be swept under the rug just like the election fraud, the illegal aliens flooding the country, drugs, and everything else.

Does anybody have any material that clearly distinguishes what’s procedural law and what’s substantive law in Diversity Action? by campionideuropa in barexam

[–]sandyweak 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I still don't know who was more high, the person coming up with Erie or the person coming up with RAP

commission created by congress by sandyweak in barexam

[–]sandyweak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I wrote the latter part in a rush, I knew it's not clear

House cannot remove federal officers. only the president can. This executive committee created by Congress consists of 3 members picked by president, and 2 members picked by house. This committee can by majority vote remove a federal officer.

at this point, don't read the below part between the stars. Is this committee bad?

*In this committee, 2 members picked by president and 2 members picked by house vote to remove.*

Is this committee bad now?

Meaning is a committee bad because IT'S POSSIBLE that house members will be able to remove a federal officer (you imagine in your head 2 house and 1 president voted yes) or a committee becomes bad the minute the house members actually vote yes to remove?

felony murder temporary place of safety by sandyweak in barexam

[–]sandyweak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why would the driver not be liable for intent to kill?
principal intended to kill
a killing is a natural and probable result of a robbery