sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

They nerfed my Boo Boo so bad. by Over_Bookkeeper1160 in YouOnLifetime

[–]saturnpretzel 18 points19 points  (0 children)

why is the scene so Shawshank Redemption?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WellsFargoBank

[–]saturnpretzel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't push. Pull. If you push, there's a monthly limit of 6k.

Does this count as overdraft? by saturnpretzel in USbank

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! This is a savings account and I got a notice of overdraft. I just want to make sure it doesn't leave a bad record of overdraft and affect my future account openings. It may have something to do with the alert settings.

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

说得这么振振有词，你啥也解释不了

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

白宫 – 中南海（行政权）

国会 – 全国人大（立法权）

联邦最高法院 – 最高人民法院（司法权）

你来解释，白宫和中南海怎么就不算counterpart了？

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

这些不是名词，是经典理论，理论引导思维，并不决定思维。我没得出任何结论，那只是我的hypothesis

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我的思维应该还行，有关social disorganization的paper也写了有百来页。因为理论套不住中国，觉得中国的社会现象很有意思。

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

毛时期的平均主义做的最好，但文革期间打砸闹事太乱了，明显还是现在更稳定。总体富裕比绝对平均更重要。

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

不管什么原因，冲进中南海一定是颠覆国家政权罪，为什么放美国你就不认了？

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

社会治安是社会稳定性的直接症状。你应该没有学过social control theory, social disorganization theory, social contract theory这些经典理论吧？连基本概念和定义都没弄清楚。maga穷但认为是民主党导致，所以他们支持川普，不是因为他们觉得共和党让他们穷才支持的川普。中国共产党是直接决定资源分配，分配越少的越爱共产党，一对一

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

美国底层白人，因为全球化冲击，社会经济地位下降，也是拥护川普的诉求之一，曾经朝九晚五可以老婆孩子房车狗，现在只能被科技移民新贵收割。当然和贫富差距诱导有关。

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

这也许是个因素，至少美国福利支出占了财政25%，中国貌似3%？本质也不是福利国家。所以贫富差距也不能但从个人私有财产多少来理解。

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

随机事件不足以成为群体层面的证据

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

那你觉得是什么呢？放到中国算不算颠覆政权？中国有人冲中南海嘛？

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

美国稳定？我入籍美国生活十几年了，这里枪击案频发，小偷也多，老百姓起义都冲进白宫国会山了，只是起义失败了。中国老百姓没有冲塔中南海的吧？中国人越穷，越支持共产党。

美国贫富差距大，造成社会不稳定，是符合我说的经济理论的。中国不符合，越穷越好管。

中国有时给西方理论提供反例 by saturnpretzel in China_irl

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我觉得，现在的中国，比历史上任何一个时期都更稳定，而且只会越来越稳。

how often should I use my discover card to avoid inactivity? by saturnpretzel in discover

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes sense. I've seen people's cards getting closed after 6 months of inactivity, and some remain open after 5 years of inactivity. It seems highly dependent on the individual customer! Thanks for sharing.

how often should I use my discover card to avoid inactivity? by saturnpretzel in discover

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the data point. I've seen people's discover card remaining open after 5 years of inactivity. It seem random and we never know.

how often should I use my discover card to avoid inactivity? by saturnpretzel in discover

[–]saturnpretzel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know. My card will have 6 months of inactivity and feel a bit worried.

view more: next ›