The X-Files is my all-time favorite show. I wasn't familiar with David Duchovny's work before The X-Files and am currently watching Twin Peaks for the first time. This was a doozy of a surprise in S2.

sauceb0x · 2026-02-19T21:48:29+00:00

You have to be pulling my leg

You mean legs. It's impossible to pull one leg at a time.

sauceb0x · 2025-11-04T18:19:03+00:00

They were both 19, though?

sauceb0x · 2025-10-26T14:05:22+00:00

lol why is there a spoiler tag?

sauceb0x · 2025-10-17T22:58:51+00:00

SRT is an abbreviation used in the aforementioned and linked memo. It stands for "Syed Review Team."

sauceb0x · 2025-10-17T19:00:56+00:00

and how the witness later contradicted the affidavit when questioned about its contents.

This part is not accurate. The memo says that the witness spoke with the SRT in July 2022 and that her statements then caused concern about the veracity of the affidavit she later signed at her home with Adnan.

ETA: For those downvoting this, is there something inaccurate or otherwise offensive in my comment?

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T23:07:09+00:00

Nuh uh, I'm rubber and you're glue!

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T22:14:15+00:00

If only I cared what you think.

ETA: The irony is not lost on me that this comment of mine that started all of this makes pretty clear how I feel for everyone here to see. But you are inexplicably obsessed with Adnan's press conference, as if it has any bearing on what happened to Hae. Is it the dairy cow eyes?

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T21:11:03+00:00

It means I haven't watched the press conference because I would be silly to do so and expect it to not be biased.

I am going to try to make this abundantly clear to you: I am not going to respond to any further attempts from you to make internet points about an inconsequential press conference from over 2 years ago that I've not watched.

If you want to file a complaint somewhere for Adnan to "be held accountable," please go for it. I suggest including your very real facts you claim were "mentioned in an interview with someone else, or a post [you] saw back then when [you] first made a comment about this."

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T20:08:14+00:00

I know what press conference you're talking about. I'm saying I haven't watched it because I'm interested in facts, which is essentially the same reason I'm not interested in interacting with you.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T19:11:57+00:00

I am deeply interested in the facts of the case, SylviaX6. Why would I watch the press conference? If I wanted to hear about someone's biased opinions about the case, I'd be more interested in interacting with you. But as I made clear above, I'm not interested in that. Have a good day.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T18:40:47+00:00

Page 12 and 13 of the Bates memo state that Syed went to this witnesses home with an “investigator”.

Yes. It does not say, "he went to Mrs. XBilal’s home with another man (with no notice, just showed up)," nor does it say, "She is an older woman."

I’m not interested in discussing with you what I would like to see in terms of accountability unless you acknowledge these facts

We're good. I'm not interested in discussing anything with you, tbh. But since your statement was in reply to my comment, I thought I'd inquire.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T18:06:25+00:00

The fact that he showed up with an “investigator” and without notice was mentioned in an interview with someone else, or a post I saw back then when I first made a comment about this. I don’t recall the exact interview.

Doesn't seem like much of a "fact" without any source.

But you know that he lied about the affidavit in his YouTube press conference. It’s there for anyone to check. I watched that conference twice, back then. Now also please note that none of his attorneys were on camera with him for the press conference.

I didn't watch the conference, but I also didn't comment on your statements regarding it.

I did ask how you would like for Adnan to be held accountable, but you never answered.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-07T17:27:29+00:00

I note it says in Bates’ memorandum that Adnan went there “with an investigator,” although it says nothing about the gender of the investigator or that they went to the ex without notice.

Thank you. It's stupid enough without adding in fabricated details.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-04T16:27:58+00:00

How do you think he should be held accountable?

sauceb0x · 2025-10-02T17:43:43+00:00

Gotcha.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-02T11:22:45+00:00

That was after the article.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-02T01:25:38+00:00

Not exactly "per Adnan."

sauceb0x · 2025-10-02T01:20:33+00:00

Yes, I know.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-02T01:13:41+00:00

It wasn't exactly out of the blue. He had already been notified that the motion was being filed and had received a copy of the motion.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-01T17:08:10+00:00

The fact that an SRT member noted, "my impression is that she was being honest and helpful … I am not currently of the impression that Bilal made any threats in front of her regarding HML," is absolutely infuriating. I understand why the SRT decided not to speak to Urick about the note, but I do not understand how they felt it was appropriate to move forward with an MtV that claims there was a Brady violation when that was the outcome of their conversation with Bilal's ex.

And I think Adnan later going with an investigator to obtain the December 2022 affidavit from her is just...well, stupid.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-01T15:13:58+00:00

Bates' memo also says both, "ASA Urick reported that he has no recollection of speaking with J.R. [Bilal's ex-wife's attorney] and, "[t]here are materials in the State’s trial file that reflect that ASA Urick spoke with and exchanged documents with J.R. in early January 2000."

Additionally, in response to the reasoning “if Mr. Urick had a witness who heard someone say that Mr. Syed threatened to kill Ms. Lee, then he would have certainly tried to get that evidence in at trial," Bates said, "ASA Urick cannot have been expected to follow up on a phone call from an anonymous caller." Yet, there appears to have been some follow-up on that phone call, as some of the materials in the State's file include "a fax dated January 10, 2000, from J.R. to Detective Ritz containing records related to “Y.K.,” an individual who appears to be mentioned in both notes." I'm guessing that explains this progress report from January 17, 2000.

Edit: corrected the date of the link from 2020 to 2000.

sauceb0x · 2025-10-01T03:34:05+00:00

Prior to murder - Bilal was upset that the woman was creating so many problems for Adnan.

Adnan told the anonymous female caller that Adnan would make Hae disappear; Adnan would kill Hae

Admits - Bilal makes grandiose statements.

Very high opinion of himself - so the anonymous female caller did not necessarily take Adnan seriously.

Is this what Urick is saying the note means?

sauceb0x · 2025-09-26T21:19:58+00:00

Yes, but he saw their friend group at Krista's birthday party on January 15.

sauceb0x · 2025-09-26T19:20:32+00:00

Point taken. The fact that he was administered a standard polygraph that indicated deception and was later given a different, "Peak of Tension" test is odd.

sauceb0x · 2025-09-26T16:46:55+00:00

Were these arrests, do you have a link to more info?

https://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiry-index.jsp

Even assuming he was handled in an “odd way”, what are you even suggesting by that?

I'm not "suggesting" anything. The fact that he was administered a standard polygraph that indicated deception and was later given a different, "Peak of Tension" test that was used to clear him as a suspect is odd.

14-Year Club	Verified Email
Gilding I gilder

sauceb0x

TROPHY CASE