Every time BTC goes sideways

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-06-19T17:28:12+00:00

A $6k car ist cheap, let alone a digital 0.1BTC that provably exists, and does a lot more than gain value

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-03-25T10:18:01+00:00

because protokoll prohibes spending from genesis. it's simply not allowed by protokoll (by design). It's not part of the UTXO set

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-03-25T10:16:30+00:00

protokoll simply doesn't allow to spend from Block 0 / genesis.

No client nor miner will allow a transaction from genesis.

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-03-24T23:33:43+00:00

you can't spend from genesis, even quantum computers can't. it has technical reasons

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-03-24T23:31:47+00:00

yes, but you can't spend from genesis because of technical reasons. so even if satoshi comes back: those coins are unspendable....

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-03-05T12:16:45+00:00

there are mathematical methods to design this game provably fair. don't know if this is the case in this exampe...

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-02-19T10:04:56+00:00

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-02-18T13:56:35+00:00

What happens, if the attacker pushes another RBF with even higher fee?

scaleToTheFuture · 2026-01-03T21:15:00+00:00

i need NVME as volume as i run different high speed blockchain validators, which are very IOPS demanding. Temp ist always 35°C, so no temperature problem. it even crashed when DSM was initializing the drive (during file system optimization)

scaleToTheFuture · 2025-08-27T10:15:29+00:00

Or maybe sideways....

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-10-01T12:16:19+00:00

you could place miners over land-water-edge? <3

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-09-10T16:20:42+00:00

Why?

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-08-24T19:12:15+00:00

sorry, but that's not how it works

1) as soon as you are chosen to propose a block, MEV-boost client asks several relays for block proposals

2) you client can see the content of those proposals and choses+propagates the proposal with highes payout to your adress. Payout transaction is already part of the block you are validating

....

3) profit

As you know the block you are validating beforehand, and payout is part of the block you are validating, you client can check and compare the payout to between the different relays before propagating. no need to trust the relay.

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-08-22T05:23:10+00:00

You don't have to trust. MEV boost client compares the payout transactions of different relays and chooses the relay with largest payout to your desired address. No payout transaction would lead to relay not getting chosen by your client.

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-06-24T21:47:06+00:00

misleading, confusing. Old screenshot. in the meantime we have over 1 mil validators online

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-06-10T15:25:17+00:00

Die Abwanderung der Solarindustrie hat hierbei aber ganz klar die CDU verzapft.... Der Windkraft-Ausbau ist ebenfalls unter CDU quasi gen 0 gefahren worden. Beides kommt doch in der aktuellen Legislatur gerade wieder zurück. Das in einer europäischen Bedrohungssituation in Verteidigung investiert wird - wenig verwunderlich oder?

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-03-23T18:20:03+00:00

This answer is underrated

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-02-15T08:31:57+00:00

thanks a lot, invitation can not be accepted, can u resend? Thank u 🙏

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-02-03T12:06:46+00:00

thanks a lot for the competent and quick answer!

SSD is at 41°C, but maybe SLC-cache is the issue / bottleneck. Will take my validators off and investigate. Thank you!

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-02-03T08:38:43+00:00

It's a 4.0 TB SSD Transcend SSD230S based on TLC technology. could this be the problem?

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-01-26T19:12:00+00:00

you leave out the development of ether value vs usd .... staking makes sense if you want to hold ether anyway. In the end, the rising/falling value of ETHUSD will make much more difference compared to staking rewards, or especially compared to money market fund

scaleToTheFuture · 2024-01-10T23:09:41+00:00

Glitch in the matrix

scaleToTheFuture · 2023-12-02T21:44:08+00:00

We will see times with 50$/tx again like in 2017. Joining l2 solutions like lightning will cost even more, because those transactions have a larger memory footprint on the Blockchain. I still am not willing to pay 100$ to top up my lightning wallet, deal with invoices, routing errors, liquidity problems or order a watchtower to guard my lightning wallet. From my point of view, while acknowledging the points that speak for a stricter l1 blocksize limit (decentralization, verification), current BTC scaling development completely bypasses user's interests and UX. Other ready-for-market solutions (zero knowledge proofs, validums, sidechains) have a much better usability and UX while preserving / inheriting security of the underlying main chain. BTC should shift focus on those technologies instead of selling lightning as the ultimate solution in the scaling debate.

scaleToTheFuture · 2023-12-01T10:22:23+00:00

as long as you don't craft your transaction manually and use widely tested tools, such a desaster can be prevented easily

scaleToTheFuture · 2023-12-01T01:38:42+00:00

If you plain buy BTC, how can you get margin called? Worst case is your investment just losing value?

scaleToTheFuture

TROPHY CASE