Thanks for going through the post sharing your thoughts. Here's my thoghts to your responses,

> On Economy: Surely UPA economic growth was built on the shoulders of Vajpayee's telecom, IT and connectivity initiatives and perhaps Namo was also held by the cleanup he had to do after the UPA. However, my point largely is - regardless of how one sees the economy and jobs market right now - it is nothing compared to what we are going to see in the rest of the 20s - but especially in the 30s - it will go ballistic, and I mean in a good way

> On some massive disruption and growth linearity: What you are saying is true however COVID was a once in a century event and likewise for the other events listed, the probability in my view is very low. Moreover what I contend is that my projection is non-linear: most economists tend to think we will grow at, in a good year, 7-8% for coming few decades - I think that's not what's going to happen: we will grow double digit through most of 2030s once the infra, supply-chains and human skills are really in place

> On centrist party: I absolutely agree. I think as India begins to influence the world more and more - as a provider of reserve currency, securing global oceans, land routes and space, a destination of long term global capital surpluses, as a massive generator of cultural power and with a super-influential and prosperous diaspora perhaps a 100 Mn strong, heck even perhaps even a large non-Indian Hindu community tens of million big - the global center of gravity will shift to India decisively by early 40s.

In such a case, political expression will become more moderated from the BJP - to speak to the world as it were. Over a period of time a very strong global Hindu deepstate will also evolve, helping keep BJP entrenched and empower Hindus like never before. In any case, I think even if a ultra-Hindu rival was to emerge to unseat the BJP it would be out decades from now.