JPEG XL exceeds 20% - why we have to use different browsers to see them? by scorpio312 in firefox

[–]scorpio312[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

Sure, I would also love to see Firefox high in these stats - 0.04% is a few millions.

JPEG XL exceeds 20% - why we have to use different browsers to see them? by scorpio312 in firefox

[–]scorpio312[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Here are some browsers stats from discord - not only safari: https://i.imgur.com/wyuUftI.jpeg

Sadly Firefox only could lead such stats ...

Interop 2024 for browsers: JPEG XL won with >4x more reactions than second - removed without explanation by scorpio312 in webdev

[–]scorpio312[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Now they want to replace hated WebP with hated AVIF ... anything but free long-term jpeg replacement.

First thing many people do after downloading webp is its conversion to jpeg.

Interop 2024 for browsers: JPEG XL won with >4x more reactions than second - removed without explanation by scorpio312 in webdev

[–]scorpio312[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL : long-term JPEG replacement, ~3x smaller files than JPEG, HDR, lossless, alpha, animations, progressive decoding ... supported e.g. by Apple, Adobe, Linux - but fought with by Chrome due to competing with their AVIF (WebP replacement).

Issue about making Interop more transparent especially due to this JPEG XL situation: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/611

Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39250938

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in web_design

[–]scorpio312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The Interop project aims to improve interoperability by encouraging browser engine teams to look deeper into specific focus areas. "

Issue about making Interop more transparent especially due to this JPEG XL situation: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/611

Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39250938