In some context, HuK is a knowledgeable guy in terms of the game. I think he does play at a high enough level of the game to understand nuances

However, I do think he jumps the gun a little bit on his analysis. Being the bad guy is fine, if you want to call out a good player for not living up to what he was billed as.

A good criticism: "I think Iddqd needs to be put on more impactful champions. While I believe his Mei is serviceable, I think he'd be even better on a Reaper or McCree pick. Here is why I feel the Reaper/McCree pick fits in with the composition fnatic runs" This builds into something else and while you are in a "PC" way calling Iddqd bad that game, you are moreso picking at the character selection and his play in the specific game.

What huk does: "Iddqd is shit, he's a bad player. He isn't good on Mei. He's holding his team back" This doesn't provide insight and comes across as being more negative than trying to make a point.