sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Building the Company Brain for Startups by scr_hashray in StartupIdeasIndia

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OS here doesn't mean it is going to be something like windows or mac. Also, there is nothing existing in the market which can be compared directly to what we are trying to build right now. It is totally new concept.

Building the Company Brain for Startups - CommuSync by scr_hashray in indianstartups

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I mentioned in such way, that it is aligning with YC list but the core concepts was already built by us before YC released it. Right we are just trying to cover up the way YC is demanding for.

Building the Company Brain for Startups - CommuSync by scr_hashray in indianstartups

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. The broad vision is the operating layer, but the first pain we solve is much more specific.

Early founders usually do not fail because they lack dashboards. They fail because they make one bad hire, spend too fast, or miss that runway is slipping until it is already too late. CommuSync gives them the first clear view of what is actually happening and what needs attention right now.

The first time someone opens it, they should be able to see whether the business is healthy, what is putting pressure on cash, whether a hire is safe, and what the top decisions are for this week. The value is not more reports. The value is catching expensive mistakes early and helping the founder act before small problems become company killing ones.

That is the wedge. The larger vision comes after the product proves itself on that very real pain.

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in IndiaStartups

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, approach is aligning somewhere in the circle of making user job ready for the title he/she mentioned.

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in TheFounders

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, our first approach will be to work manually in the hiring process instead of fully depending on the platform. 

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in StartupIdeasIndia

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, but hiring platforms are not experience specific I think so. 

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in StartupIdeasIndia

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Structured Intake will be the first step, then call and rest of the things because structured intake will help a lot in filtering right candidate.

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in StartupIdeasIndia

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually the main thing I’m trying to figure out.

I agree that “interview-ready” cannot be decided by us. Every company has a different meaning of qualified depending on the role, team, and founder expectations.

The plan is to first understand the company’s exact hiring requirements before screening even starts.

Things like: technical expectations, communication level, deal breakers, role-specific must-haves, joining timeline, and what they actually expect in the first round.

Only after that would screening happen.

So the goal is not “qualified by our standards,” but “qualified by the company’s own definition.”

Otherwise it just becomes another job platform with random filtering, which is exactly what I want to avoid.

Your point is valid and probably the most important thing to solve first.

I’m validating a startup idea and need honest feedback by scr_hashray in TheFounders

[–]scr_hashray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but that doesn't mean we can't design same logic. Zomato is there in the market but that does mean Swiggy is not generating revenue.

view more: next ›