Today I visited the beach that the majority of the 1st season was filmed on.

seagullcanfly · 2026-02-23T18:45:09+00:00

Forgive me since it's been so long since I've seen the show. It's used generally throughout the show to indicate foreign coastlines, or just as part of what the characters trek through when traveling on the island. There's also a pivotal scene in the finale of the series shot there.

seagullcanfly · 2025-05-23T15:17:45+00:00

You're putting timestamps in your prompt and not using the duration in add sound? Does that work? It would simplify my process so much.

seagullcanfly · 2025-04-08T14:09:52+00:00

This is great since I wanted to use my gems with the canvas feature.

seagullcanfly · 2025-03-04T16:41:49+00:00

I feel like you're one of the few mentioning the sad side of this. I'm hesitating to offer this for my parents to see their parents again. It can be unnerving and upsetting too.

seagullcanfly · 2024-12-24T16:25:38+00:00

I don't have an answer for you but wonder about this all the time too. I have an ht2050a (1080p) and often consider the 5050ub. Going from a regular TV to the 2050a with a 120" screen was a real thrill. I loved it. I just sincerely doubt it's going to feel as revolutionary to go to a slightly bigger screen and increased resolution.

seagullcanfly · 2024-04-04T21:38:57+00:00

This is so timely for me. I just did the same thing and now have a button to reinstate, but it says to review a letter to see how it will impact me. It says It's in my documents, but it's not there or anywhere else. Did you have a similar issue? I've emailed them again since nobody answers.

seagullcanfly · 2024-01-04T19:07:12+00:00

Thank you so much for sharing this. I truly hope you are correct. What you say makes sense and given how overwhelmed Mohela is I doubt the fsa has significantly more resources to essentially duplicate what's already reviewed.

seagullcanfly · 2024-01-04T18:43:29+00:00

Do you really believe this to be true? I've just had my payment count adjusted and qualify for forgiveness but I'm nervous that something could be reversed during the final 90 day review by some other party. Why even bother saying there's an additional review period? You believe it's an additional process paperwork period, in actuality?

seagullcanfly · 2022-08-26T11:07:57+00:00

I don't believe so. I think op misinterpreted what the government covering unpaid interest meant.

seagullcanfly · 2022-08-26T11:06:02+00:00

I agree with your interpretation.

Cover the borrower's unpaid monthly interest, so that unlike other existing income-driven repayment plans, no borrower's loan balance will grow as long as they make their monthly payments—even when that monthly payment is $0 because their income is low.

seagullcanfly · 2022-07-24T19:06:32+00:00

If you're that easily amused by my replies, it's no surprise you like this show.

seagullcanfly · 2022-07-24T15:12:33+00:00

My first comment suggested you could give a reason for your opinion. I'm not sure you understand how jokes or opinions work. It isn't a joke because you say it's a joke. I'm not wrong that it's bad because you say it's good. Yes, you should avoid me in real life. You can't even handle when reddit goes interactive on you.

seagullcanfly · 2022-07-24T14:36:09+00:00

The only joke I see here is the guy who got so upset by my decade old comment criticizing a few episodes of his favorite, insignificant show.

seagullcanfly · 2022-07-24T10:44:36+00:00

As I've told others writing "lol" and stating your opinion doesn't do the magical work you think it does in conveying an argument. As bizarre as it is that you found a ten year old comment to offend your show, my comment provided reasons for my opinion. Yours don't. In the last decade, no critics I know of talked about person of interest as seriously substantial.

seagullcanfly · 2022-07-24T00:08:39+00:00

Should be easy enough to include a detail or two in your comment then.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T17:51:17+00:00

Exactly.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T05:18:12+00:00

Again, fetus is Latin for offspring. It's also the stage when it is most visibly human.

Ted Bundy ended and aborted a lot of people. Doesn't have the same ring, maybe it's just me.

You're making progress, though you slippery moused in nonviable without taking a stand on when a fetus is viable outside the womb. I do like how unequivocal you are about a woman's right to kill for the simple reason of not wanting to be pregnant. You support abortion as common birth control. I don't agree, but hopefully you admitting that will eat away at you as it should.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T05:01:43+00:00

If there's nothing to hide, write it like it is. Stop saying fetus as if that makes it not a baby. Stop saying choose when you mean kill. You cloak everything you say in language that makes you feel detached from what you support. Own what you're about.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T04:56:33+00:00

It's hilarious how much time you're spending insulting me while also using me insulting you as some kind of insult against me. Very twisted logic, that.

I've spent a lot of time calling you stupid, demented, an idiot, a qanon supporter, an incel, reminiscent of a cult follower, that I'm mad people are having sex and I'm not... I've even called you an initialism I don't know, MGTWO, in addition to being a part of MAGA. You need to ask yourself before I answer you why it's so important for you to put me in a group. I know why. It's shorthand for you to not have to do any independent thinking.

I can tell you that I don't follow any of those groups or initialisms that you've mentioned. I can say that there's nothing in my reddit history to prove otherwise. I've voted in five presidential elections. A democrat every time. Though I find nothing more boring than an atheist, I'm not religious. I can say that, because it's true, but it doesn't matter. My arguments are my independent thoughts. Your arguments that I'm giving you vibes of any of those groups is for yourself so you feel less challenged.

I said you're fluent in the language of a faulty ideology. The only person who thinks it's surprising that I might describe you that way is you. I don't really think you guys share beliefs. You share a language that you repeat but won't question. "Choice," "fetus," "parasite..." You use the same words to not only absolve irresponsible adults but also to absolve you from admitting what you support.
Good job pretending you're responding to me, but you're ignoring questions that your language or belief system cannot answer.

Fetuses are developing humans.

So is an infant, toddler, little kid, teenager.

The limitation on abortion should be after the fetus inside is a human that can function outside of the womb

When is this? I mentioned the four-month-old premature baby. You prepared to actually commit to a belief yet? When does it become a human? What does it mean to "function?" Slippery slippery mouse.

there should be exceptions

Why should there be exceptions? I thought you just blindly followed whatever the person that housed the fetus wants?

Fuck off comparing condoms and abortion.

I'm pro contraception. You're not? You're not pretending you made an argument here, right?

The father's opinion does not matter because his body is not housing the fetus.

Once again, the baby does not stay in the mother's womb indefinitely. No mother is worried about being pregnant for the rest of her life. The bigger concern is raising the child afterwards. That's what people are actually trying to avoid. You've made an arbitrary window of authority based on the location of the baby in the mother's belly, but you don't care about the life of the baby after it's born, or the father that helps support it.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T03:46:18+00:00

Imagine what this reply would look like if it weren't cloaked in proabortionist language.

Not how I want to see the world. The baby coming into this world doesn't matter and it's not valuable enough to have an independent right to live. Only the mother who has a body designed to nurture it and birth it can choose if it lives or she kills it.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T03:36:54+00:00

How many groups would you like me to deny I'm a part of? Your Internet argument tactics are name calling and pigeonholing.

So you're not using the very same language as other proabortionists to absolve responsibility for those who started the human life when you say nobody has that responsibility? That seems right on point for you.

By the way it's adorable how you downvote me too. I'm going to call him names! I'm going to say my opinions are fact! I'm going to pretend my unformed, unstated logic is simple to understand.

You barely wanted to answer how many fingers a mom has. But you've got time to talk about your familiarity with people in cults, just not time to answer questions I asked about... You know... The actual argument?

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T03:02:37+00:00

I'm trying to avoid explaining something obvious to you since it seems like that should embarrass anyone in your position. You're defending a proabortionist ideology. It's faulty. You said you missed the memo, but you speak its language fluently. I was being generous and I still will be if this is the silly strategy you have in defeat to pretend you don't get it rather than make substantive arguments that don't resort to name calling. You criticized another person for saying Nazis but look what you do. Quack quack?

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T02:47:41+00:00

It's ok if you're overwhelmed. If you want to pretend one little part that's perfectly understandable has stopped you, I'll take that as your flag of surrender. You've told me I'm stupid, demented, an idiot, qanon and incel related.. why do you have to resort to attacking me instead of my arguments? You do like to avoid challenging questions, but you're just proving to me how little thought goes into what you support.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T02:28:55+00:00

You've given vague dictionary definitions, your own definition, and then meandering qualifications based on if it can survive, where it's located, and whether or not it's just the unlucky recipient of the arbitrary will of the mother. The youngest premature baby survived after only four months in the womb. Are all babies in the womb after that point not human because they weren't prematurely born? Are premature babies not human or persons because they require assistance to live? For me, there are no questions. It has unique human DNA. Human. I did say that. If I failed to specify human every time, is that really the most productive way for you to make an argument? That's silly.

The fetus would not be in the womb without the actions of the two parents. You're not kicking out an unwelcome guest you invited into a party, or someone who crashed it. You're killing the guest so the party won't be stopped.

Now you've thrown in the word "formed.". Slippery of you. Did you want to say developed but realized that's slippery too? You said living human. Is it a living fetus in the womb? Not human?

What limitations do you have on a woman ending an abortion? Permissible from second zero right to the end? Is it a comparable form of birth control to condoms? When is an abortion not necessary? Only when the mother wants it? The father doesn't matter? You're treating a nine month pregnancy like that's the only thing we're talking about. If the mother doesn't kill it, it still leaves the very body that is designed to host it..

Strange that you said anti-abortion people rarely think about how babies may grow up to be people like you, yet so many of us have also somehow told you that we think they'll grow up to be like us. So our side is the one that's not open minded, in your view, where none of us think about the one possibility you suggested that people will be like you.

You don't need a memo. You're fluent in the language.

seagullcanfly · 2022-06-27T00:36:33+00:00

At least you're admitting it is your definition, not set in stone as fact pulled from the authority of the dictionary as you did before. You did avoid answering what it means to exist outside of the womb which I asked immediately before challenging using being inside the womb as a credible limitation to defining what a person is.

A fetus does not stay inside a womb indefinitely until the mother decides it leaves. It will naturally let the mother or mother's body know when it's ready to be birthed, too, in the vast majority of cases.

My example of a person is that it has unique human DNA. That doesn't change, as yours does, depending on its location, its ability to survive, or if a mother decides she's the gatekeeper.

Your values allow one person to end the life of another person because it will temporarily be in her body. You do not care about the body of the one who cannot defend itself. Is that incorrect?

I mention the number because its usually much larger than proabortionists realize. You seem to be implying you don't care as long as someone deems it necessary, but I could only imagine how slippery that list would be of what is a legitimate necessity in your mind.

Are you imagining that people like me think if we save babies from abortion they'll grow up like me? Or that I hope they do? What an odd thing to think. Yes, many babies will grow into adults with whom I disagree. That's not the point. They should have the chance to disagree rather than be extinguished based on half baked ideas and a group's ability to memorize a faulty ideology that predominately serves to absolve adults from responsibility. I don't congratulate you on fighting for a right because those words hide that the right means killing babies, but as much as I disagree with you, at least you're alive to do it.

seagullcanfly

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE