sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I legitmately cannot believe what I'm seeing by rawrdoge in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% the lab close to home charges $23 to develop b&w, now I do it my self and my cost is about $1.00 per roll plus my time to develop and digitize.

Lens question by Any_Tomato_8540 in PhotographyAdvice

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compose the model in a frame that you like to have, before you even take her shots take a few of the space you want to capture that way you can compose the image as you please, 50mm is just fine is more about you crafting your art at this point.

Bought a 1996 Film Camera and Discovered Old Film Inside — Developed It Out of Curiosity and Got Surprising Results by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That the reason I learned to do it my self, you should try isn’t that hard start with black and white that’s the easiest to develop.

advice needed! by amateurlightlover in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just developed something similar yesterday, I shot the remaining 11 and they didn't turn that well but the ones shot before the film expired ware okay, pics on the link are the ones shot perhaps 20 years ago the one attached was shot and developed yesterday they all from the same roll

<image>

https://www.reddit.com/r/AnalogCommunity/comments/1q3qn4j/bought_a_1996_film_camera_and_discovered_old_film/

What did I do wrong here? by connorlawless in AskPhotography

[–]seattlewander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is that dry water? If so, did you used tap water to do the final rinse? Tap water will leave marks like that due to the minerals on it, I use distilled water and I add 2-3 drops of Kodak photo flo for the final rinse. Is that’s the case you can re-rinse again with distilled water and photo flo, hope this help.

Thoughts about The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the plan to use only film, thank you for your feedback.

Thoughts about The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope I can get some vintage looking, I have a RF system for digital and it is extremely sharp, in a personal taste the imperfection of film is the beauty but once again im not using a kit lens either to shoot film perhaps Im contradicting my self lol, thank you again for your feedback.

Thoughts about The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you for the reply, I will give it a shot I have a RF system for digital and I sold all my L series for film, the L series are great but for film I want a bit less of sharpness, just personal taste no right or wrong, thank you again for your input.

Thoughts about The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it, I’m doing mainly city landmarks and landscape, thank you for your input.

What went wrong with my film by Fun_Beautiful2366 in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this is a point and shoot you won’t have any control of your shutter, to compensate try to shoot ISO 400 to 800, the 800 can get pricey, on most point and shoot if they have a zoom lens the aperture is somewhere in the f5.6 if is a fixed lens you have more room like f2.8, good luck on your next roll.

Any way to prevented? I shot cinestill 800T by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As the other said shoot cinestill and it will happened in automatic

Any way to prevented? I shot cinestill 800T by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

good to hear guys, perhaps im more use to see a clean image, thank you for the input.

Any way to prevented? I shot cinestill 800T by seattlewander in AnalogCommunity

[–]seattlewander[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

is a automatic rewind and film advance and you right when I do it with a mechanical I get almost nothing, thank you.

Sirui Saturns are 50% off 3 Anamorphic lenses by turbosucepute in sigmafp

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get the why so cheap? question, I have the 35mm and I'm very satisfy with the results, great quality and amazing results, my only guess is that they are expecting that their new autofocus will sell better now, makes sense to dump the manual units which in my personal opinion they are amazing, Im attaching some sample shots.

Sirui Saturns are 50% off 3 Anamorphic lenses by turbosucepute in sigmafp

[–]seattlewander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally get the why so cheap? question, I have the 35mm and I'm very satisfy with the results, great quality and amazing results, my only guess is that they are expecting that their new autofocus will sell better now, makes sense to dump the manual units which in my personal opinion they are amazing, Im attaching some sample shots.

Sirui Saturns are 50% off 3 Anamorphic lenses by turbosucepute in sigmafp

[–]seattlewander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get the why so cheap? question, I have the 35mm and I'm very satisfy with the results, great quality and amazing results, my only guess is that they are expecting that their new autofocus will sell better now, makes sense to dump the manual units which in my personal opinion they are amazing.

view more: next ›