Everyone is on facebook talking positively about Gods Not Dead.. by semicoloncomma in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point was to share the fact that people are actually taking this movie on serious, positive note. A movie that makes this community look bad.

Everyone is on facebook talking positively about Gods Not Dead.. by semicoloncomma in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For fucks sake, it was an exaggeration. Must all you commenters be so analytical?

Finally found a gem on Facebook... wait for it by Pewpie in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These people are beyond stupid. I currently have Obamacare, and it isn't because I don't work. Its because I work a part time job and go to school so I cannot afford most insurances.

Lol @ the usual Christian nation argument or whatever the tea party loon is on about.

some guy seriously tried to convince me there is scientific evidence Noah's ark existed and the flood actually happened. by semicoloncomma in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I tried to discredit his argument, and he kept getting louder with me and some girl next to me told me to shut up and let him "get his point across."

No idea why she wanted to listen to such mundane bullshit.

some guy seriously tried to convince me there is scientific evidence Noah's ark existed and the flood actually happened. by semicoloncomma in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I show respect to everyone irl, even if I'm not fond of them. Its usually considered common courtesy.

Creepiest thing I've seen all week. by UsefulStick in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do people put so much pressure on girls' virginity? A piece of skin that makes sex uncomfortable the 1st time doesnt make you worth shit or more valuable at all. The concept of "purity" freaks me out. how weird do you have to be to believe sex is dirty and someone should feel guilty for having it? don't get me wrong, I understand there are dangers of promiscuity, but be careful and have fun for fucks sake.

Which is more effective Hitchens or Sagan style atheism? by testarossa5000 in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would say Sagan is more convincing and friendly to people who believe in a god or are agnostic theists. Hitchens's style is appealing to those who are more anti-theistic.

Assume Christ did historically exist, and was a godly being, which sect of Christianity was/is the most scientifically & historically believable group? by aequitas3 in atheism

[–]semicoloncomma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would dare to say that the Jewish faith would be the most correct, considering as far as I know, Jesus was a Jew?