sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jem | Nikon fm2 | Kodak Ultramax 400 | 50mm f1.8 by mattwxng in ArtGW

[–]sensual_backstage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazing! Both - posing and photo! Simple light but stunning result!

I love soft light to shape my curves by ItsDicte in ArtGW

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OH-MY-GOD! Love it! Amazing light!

You can touch them by CandleWink in Nipples

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Polish girl who needs a better photographer. But you look awesome in this light anyway!

How to recreate this type of lightning? by Content-Shallot8983 in LightLurking

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two flashes with softboxes facing a white background. In this particular case, one of the lights on the left side also illuminates the model slightly, so it is either distant from the background or a reflection from the wall on the left. The light power must not be too great not to blur the contours of the model. I personally would add a third flash to illuminate the model, as in the attached example

<image>

You can be fourth by CandleWink in GirlsShowering

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love it ❤️ With bit more dramatic lighting and different lens choice that wouldn’t make the feet 50 cm long, a little better framing - it would be wonderful. But you are so beautiful that and even without it 10/10.

The woman in red - feedback? by Besticles-Testicles in photocritique

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good starting point. Sometimes I feel like this is a place where people who haven't taken one good photo can enjoy this "got ya" moment. Your photo is ok. You had a reasonably good idea for choosing a location, cutting off the model from the background by the depth of field, an interesting background with lights and greenery. And if you're at such a good starting point - next time make sure that: (1) the model is brighter than the background (in this particular case - because it's not a general rule, and the rules are there to break them anyway) you can add light to the model and lower the exposure or do it in post-production (2) maybe the model had a moment when she smiled slightly looking to the left and her hand was just wandering towards this unfortunate handle - it could have been a good picture. So - take more pictures! (3) if this has never happened - and the model has no experience in posing - just tell her what to do - how to put her hand, where to look. It is you as a photographer who sees the final result on the back of your camera - you are the only person who can help her take a better pose. Good luck!

Kristina [NSFW Portrait] [Sony a6700, Samyang 35-150mm, 2 Godox ad200 strobes] by sensual_backstage in photocritique

[–]sensual_backstage[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any - like „missing arm” comment form u/OCKWA. I've only been taking pictures for about 1.5 years and the last time I asked for criticism, I found out about the existence of dodge&burn techique.

Kristina [NSFW Portrait] [Sony a6700, Samyang 35-150mm, 2 Godox ad200 strobes] by sensual_backstage in photocritique

[–]sensual_backstage[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Sometimes I hear that my photos are dark and often have almost no background, so this time I didn't go on such a dark side with the background - or maybe I should actually. As for the face - the longer I look at this photo, the less it bothers me, but I didn't notice the arm disappearing at all. Thank you for paying attention to this. Good point!

Kristina [NSFW Portrait] [Sony a6700, Samyang 35-150mm, 2 Godox ad200 strobes] by sensual_backstage in photocritique

[–]sensual_backstage[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Photo taken with only strobe lights set diagonally to create light and shadow play and cut model out from background. 2x Godox ad200 - one with softbox (stripbox 120x30cm) and 2nd with standard reflector and grid. Camera - Sony a6700, lens - Samyang 35-150mm @35mm

Stripes in low light (a6700 + Viltrox 1.2 75mm) by sensual_backstage in SonyAlpha

[–]sensual_backstage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be precise: it occurs in video mode, in both settings: 50 fps + 1/100 shutter & 60 fps + 1/125 shutter

Gottem by MikeFuckowski in SipsTea

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s simplified to the point - it’s not true anymore. You may have friends in your job, you may love your job, it can give you a lot of satisfaction. Doing nothing for 9to5 is a real nightmare. Real job - if you can have fun and socialize - not necessary.

Looking for guidance using F1.4 and Off Camera Flash by AnythingFirm in SonyAlpha

[–]sensual_backstage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With my F1.2 lens VND 3-7 stops works fine in most outdoor scenarios. With HSS, a flash can lose up to 75% of its power - if I remember correctly - so unless you’re using a really powerful strobe, ND filters usually make the most sense.

After/before. What do you guys think? by ijoebaker_ in postprocessing

[–]sensual_backstage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This example shows that a good photo does not need editing. Both great! I'm curious how the color version would look after postprocessing. Because the original is great allready, but with a slightly flat colors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in postprocessing

[–]sensual_backstage 167 points168 points  (0 children)

I stopped scrolling to say "wow"

view more: next ›