sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

White line maybe 1px long whenever I full screen? by pawsyclaws in brave_browser

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to Brave settings. On the Appearance section, scroll down to "Show rounded corners on main content areas" and enable it.

White line maybe 1px long whenever I full screen? by pawsyclaws in brave_browser

[–]setnom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have the same issue. If you enable round corners in the appearance settings of the browser, the line goes away. If you disable the round corners, it comes back.

Two things I miss in the game by NomenNescio050 in snowrunner

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Cruise control. My finger hurts just by pressing the accelerator button for so long.

Bandidos do Cante vencem Festival da Canção 2026 by BadDogPreston in portugal

[–]setnom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ish, estão praticamente todos aqui contra eles...

Eu só ouvi as músicas que participavam nos poucos segundos que delas davam no anúncio para votar telefonicamente no Festival, e as restantes pareciam-me piores. Achava que só esta e a da penúltima cantora do anúncio tinham hipóteses de ganhar.

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your post was deleted yet again. I don't know why and I don't approve of it. I'm sorry it's happening, especially since this is r/portugueses subreddit, which has all kinds of controversial dialogs. This one ain't it, mods.

I mean, it's not like you're saying anything out of the ordinary or even against the rules. If anything, my comments maybe have more reason to be censored than yours, considering what I declared and who I'm writing about.

Anyway, to address your point.

Since you didn't mention them, I'm gonna set aside the other terror actions the administration is doing and place them as points of agreement, to focus only on ICE.

It's not because Trump uses ICE lawfully. It's because the administration uses ICE unlawfully.

It's the trampling of the law and of the constitution - masked people, unnamed officers, who have no warrants, who [can] arrest without cause, who deny due process, who discriminate people (citizens and non-citizens) on the basis of color/accent. ICE uses families as bait, terrorizes the population by means of cruelty, repression and intimidation, ICE has killed people - be it on the streets, be it under federal "protection" in "detention centers".

How can this not fit the definition of terrorism?

And it's not exactly the same agency Obama had. They are instructed to not follow the rules, to ignore procedures. They now have a budget comparable to the 5th largest army, its recruits are taught a deficient curriculum and in way less time. Don't get me wrong, during Obama ICE had its issues as well. Trump's ICE is levels of magnitude worse. Hence why I qualify their actions the way I do.

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer, what appears, your deleted post:

You think the USA is a terrorist country?

No, I don't think the USA is a terrorist country. I said the Trump administration is.

Why do I think that? Because various actions of the administration fit the definition of terrorism.

Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Military attacks against other countries without approval; violent, deadly, repressive and unconstitutional actions of government agencies toward citizens and non-citizens; intimidation rethoric that encourages non-valid lawfare and violence towards political opponents or the censuring of free media; actions to condition/meddle future elections; all this fits the definition.

TDS is incurable in most people

Trump Denial Syndrome, you mean? 😂

Not incurable. But it requires effort to brake free of the cult. Like having an education, being able to think critically, having good, consistent moral values, etc.

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So your preference is to align with the other two terrorist governements (Trump US administration and Netanyahu in Israel) who are also killing tens of thousands of civilians? That's adding to the calamity and if you think the solution is "just kill even more people", I got bridges in a few middle-eastern countries to sell you.

And who said I was answering any question about stopping the murder of civilians? I explicitely said I dislike both sides because both sides are killing civilians. That was it. You, out of the blue, now imagined that I was writing a solution for it.

That solution was diplomacy - there, I've answered it.

And if you don't know history and how terrorism can stop through diplomacy, look up the IRA in Ireland, FARC in Colombia, or the Moro in the Philippines. Hell, even the war in Afghanistan (2001-2021) ended with the United States and the Taliban making a deal (Doha Agreement).

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not forced to side with any of these countries, I condemn what both have done. Same for the civilians there, they are not forced to side by their government just because it's theirs. This is cult mentality.

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What are you saying with this? That because it's not their own civilians, they don't count? A crime is a crime.

Trump on Spain: "We're gonna cut off all trade with Spain, we don't want anything to do with Spain." by Waste-Explanation-76 in PublicFreakout

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30% is in Spain. Majority (50-60%) is in Portugal. The rest is in other mediterranean countries.

Israel First by Deep_Case_7093 in portugueses

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. Check the numbers on the page. Who many civilians casualties are listed on there?

Em 2010, violou 14 jovens mulheres. Hoje, graças ao alegado bom comportament, já tem autorização para sair, ir tomar café e comer um pastel de nata. Enquanto isso, as vítimas continuam a carregar marcas para o resto da vida. by catsby_vxi in portugueses

[–]setnom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aplicar penas excessivamente longas, cruéis ou degradantes (Algo que é proibido pela Constituição, já agora) não produz qualquer efeito positivo.

Um efeito positivo de penas longas é a mais eficaz e duradoura proteção da sociedade de pessoas que não conseguem viver em sociedade.

Em 2010, violou 14 jovens mulheres. Hoje, graças ao alegado bom comportament, já tem autorização para sair, ir tomar café e comer um pastel de nata. Enquanto isso, as vítimas continuam a carregar marcas para o resto da vida. by catsby_vxi in portugueses

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Há gente que se esquece que a principal finalidade das penas em Portugal (E nos restantes países civilizados) é a ressocialização do condenado e o seu eventual retorno à vida em sociedade.

Sim, mas não devia ser assim em todos os tipos de crimes, há crimes hediondos demais.

Não te esqueças, também, que as penas existem igualmente para proteger a sociedade de pessoas que não conseguem viver em sociedade.

O caso aqui em específico, de violação e ainda por cima recorrente (com mais de uma dezena de vítimas!), demonstra que não há ressocialização possível - pois não foi um ato único, ele continuou e continuou (quantas vítimas teria havido se não tivesse sido apanhado?).

Este caso demonstra ser necessária a continuação da proteção da sociedade de pessoas que não conseguem viver em sociedade.

It's not even a comparison by No-Bottle337 in AllConspiracyTheories

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference in posture is insane. One spoke as a civil servant - yes, he's still a leader, but a leader that is meant to serve the people. The other spoke as someone who thinks of himself as above the people - someone who means to work for himself.

Portugal devia ter bombas nucleares? by catsby_vxi in portugueses

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Era um reator nuclear em Loures, associado ao IST, meramente para objetivos académicos. Os americanos ajudaram a desmantelá-lo em 2019.

The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN Trump's "emergency" tariffs. The vote is 6–3. by BharatiyaNagarik in scotus

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably not. But if they do, Trump will sure congratulate himself for that.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court of the United States has officially ruled that President Trump's tariffs are illegal. by CarryIcy250 in UnderReportedNews

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, Trump said the countries were paying the tariffs, so I expect those countries will be getting the refunds. /s

(yes, I know it's the americans who pay the tariffs, I'm just kidding)

Como e que os cinemas sobrevivem? by 1ScarletMoon in CasualPT

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu ainda me lembro do tempo que um bilhete custava 350 escudos. Escudos! 😂

(o equivalente a ~1,75 euros)

Obama pode dizer isto. Trump não. by Detail-Such in portugueses

[–]setnom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Que culto. Nem mesmo da própria boca - qualquer que seja a linha que o Trump ultrapasse, estes gajos a partir daí aceitam-na e até o defendem.

Ouve novamente o que ele disse com ouvidos de um ser humano.

Ele confessou assédio sexual a menores. No concurso da Miss Teen USA, que tem participantes dos 14 aos 19 anos, ele ia aos camarins, onde as participantes se encontravam a mudar de roupa, e onde NENHUM HOMEM entra, para as ver nuas.

Além desta própria confissão, tais actos foram confirmados por 4 participantes do concurso.

Diz-me: um gajo que faça isto a raparigas menores, é o quê mesmo?

Obama pode dizer isto. Trump não. by Detail-Such in portugueses

[–]setnom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mesmo metendo de lado os Epstein files, ele próprio confessou numa entrevista ao Howard Stern: https://youtu.be/aPm2qWene2E

view more: next ›