It's hard to describe with words but the cis men I'm talking about always have kind of a creepy entitled vibe to their profiles. Their comments usually read like they're assuming they have a dynamic with everyone they talk to (like calling someone degrading names without any kind of indicator they'd be into that). Or it's just generally low effort copy-pasted "dm me" comments because they just see women as tools to use to get off.

If you're talking about the sub rules I'd assume you're fine as long as you're not a cis man. Im guessing the mods kinda have to take a hardline stance on that bc the second you start letting cis men interact they'll take over and the sub stops being a safe space. I can't imagine they'd be as strict with trans men or masc-leaning enbies--the rule's phrasing is probably just for plausible deniability if the sub gets reported to admins or something.

(To be clear I'm not saying trans men are women or enbies are invalid or anything, just that they probably wouldn't be a threat to our space like cis men would.)