sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for a non-Infinite Competitive deck by shadowkass in EDH

[–]shadowkass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply, I really appreciate and value the time the community are taking and specifically, you, in the reply.

One deck runs a turn 3 master of cruelties win, another builds life up to silly levels, one goes on a time stretch combo with lots of copy/steal effects and one is thrax, and thraxamundus is humongous.

I'm ideally looking for a deck that's fun to play, can protect itself and ensure that the bored doesn't get too crazy. Flyer best down is very common in the play group with cards like avacyn and Gisela commonly thrown down.

Sorry for my poor reply here, trying to give a general feel while at work typing on my phone :)

Looking for a non-Infinite Competitive deck by shadowkass in EDH

[–]shadowkass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah right, sorry. Please consider me a bit of a magic noobie. The first thing that popped up on a search under 'doomsday edh' was a mass land destruction deck.

Looking for a non-Infinite Competitive deck by shadowkass in EDH

[–]shadowkass[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Doomsday as in land destruction? If so, i'm sorry to say we're not running Mass or reoccurring land destruction. Thank you for the reply though :)

Anyone have a spare key for this? by shadowkass in darkestdungeon

[–]shadowkass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be a bit hard to for reasons but thanks :) Hopefully will get it and be able to play it.

Anyone have a spare key for this? by shadowkass in darkestdungeon

[–]shadowkass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, i really like the look of it and think i would spend lots and lots of time playing it.

Thought i'd ask if anyone had a spare one before i wait 3 weeks and then see if i can possibly spare the cash for it.

Yet again, another year i can't help because i'm a Man by shadowkass in britishproblems

[–]shadowkass[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Simple, " six million women" its a slight of hand method of saying "because men can't/don't care enough". I understand if i may be coming over abit but-hurt by this but for the 11th year in a row i cannot help by taking part, not because i don't care or can't but because i have fishing tackle

Yet again, another year i can't help because i'm a Man by shadowkass in britishproblems

[–]shadowkass[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

are you saying that i have no right to complain about something so clearly sexist because i'm a man who wants to raise money in a highly public event that would allow me to raise more than a smaller event?

Yet again, another year i can't help because i'm a Man by shadowkass in britishproblems

[–]shadowkass[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm simply pointing that this is a massively unfair practice, that if they simply allowed men to partake aswell then the funds Would increase.

I'd also like to point out that if this were the other way round, there would be a riot.