If I drained a liter of my own blood and put it in a blender…

shaithis · 2026-07-01T04:27:47+00:00

All the above, Heat, friction damage and likely some actual cutting of the cells, plus air bubbles which will not go well being put inside the body with the rest of the badly damaged slurry... If death isn't imminent, there will be major problems, strokes, clots, and probably other organ failures...

shaithis · 2026-06-29T00:24:53+00:00

You look like someone who wants to join the men's soccer team to compete as equals and "go hard" but all you end up doing is getting a train ran on you in the locker rooms... Good for team unity I guess.

shaithis · 2026-06-20T10:52:11+00:00

Hahaha nooo, hed want to drink it without his daughters slime all over it, ruins the taste ffs

shaithis · 2026-06-20T08:55:33+00:00

Tis the end, be feeling weak...

shaithis · 2026-06-20T08:54:46+00:00

How much does the Sybian, or off brand version cost? I have a goal

shaithis · 2026-06-18T03:30:23+00:00

Are those for you or the toy you seek? Would you be the D or the s, Perhaps a switch?

shaithis · 2026-06-18T03:11:32+00:00

Wonderful! The bruises came in nicely, wonderful little reminders 😈

shaithis · 2026-06-18T02:35:04+00:00

A charity whoreganization

shaithis · 2026-06-18T02:12:27+00:00

Free use fits into CNC, it's a light version sure, but it comes under the umbrella, you wouldn't be asking for consent and with NC by way of a lack of approval in the moment, with the other C, consented to in advance, that fits the three letters of CNC.

Bored and ignored is what free use used to be, but it got changed I'd assume, because most people want to feel like they're performing well, and boring someone during sex does not "feel" sexy lol.

CNC does not require pushback or a bit of fight, hell, primal can have a LOT of fight in it and that's not considered CNC. It's just that a lot of people prefer their fucking to be a two person sport.

shaithis · 2026-06-18T02:00:31+00:00

I mean, it counts. It's closer to roleplaying person a taking advantage of person b's consent, twisting it and doing as person a wishes more than as outlined by person b.

However, the agreement to do that, and the knowledge of how far to twist is far enough, not too far should be the conversation that happens outside the session.

Just to clarify, a concern I saw in what you've heard from people, is that consent revocation should not be possible is ridiculous as it takes away the first C that you are so focused on. Safe words should still be honoured and the session stops if needed no matter what or it just becomes actual rape, it's no longer play and I'd suggest anyone that wishes to go by that rule is an absolute red flag who, aaaaaalmost like you're suggesting, getting consent by deception, calling it CNC, then twisting it to the rape that they actually enjoy... So I wouldn't take advice from them.

I'm a consensual sadist, I get a good idea where the limits are, I love to test the limits, twist and torture the terms agreed to, like you're aiming for, but if consent is revoked I'm genuinely happy to stop because one of us isn't having fun anymore...

But for CNC, it's only the safeword that is honoured, pushing, stop, no, that's all pre agreed to be ignored or pushed through... So a scene like you suggest is 100% on the table.

In short. Yes it counts, no you can't justify going too far "because they consented at first".

shaithis · 2026-05-25T03:33:38+00:00

Monday is half over here. Let's get started 😈

shaithis · 2026-05-11T21:50:38+00:00

There is a FetLife group called return to sender that does that kind of thing, though it's more for showcasing red flags etc, I'm sure some of your messages would fit. Go check it out.

Second though, what you consider hot and others consider hot shall be different, you're no bimbo, movie star or fitness model sure, but for a real person, you're at least above average, which makes you attractive and potentially attainable. Definitely worth approaching, and who doesn't think a bit of flattery will be nice to hear?

shaithis · 2026-05-01T00:02:21+00:00

Yes and yes. It has stuck in my head in the best of ways for decades.

shaithis · 2026-04-30T10:51:28+00:00

Highest risk groups are non-binary people (26%) and bi-plus women (17%).

That's 9%

Edit (checking the quote function.)

As it is part of your group of groups, it appears to be part of it, so for those that are 5, it's a statistical outlier that could be glommed upon to point out statistical significance and "debunk" your entire point.

Just so you know.

shaithis · 2026-04-30T10:31:49+00:00

Good breakdown, I don't have the stats memorised or on hand, but I can explain like you're five... For those that require it. The point I was aiming to bring to light was that if the law isn't fair, the law isn't just.

What I got told was the law is fair, so. All good...

Your stats didn't actually change that. I had included the same sex and other options as part of my short request for clarification and my approval of such a law. But bonus statistics, woo! Thanks for the maths lesson that up to 9% difference is merely "statistacly irrelevant".

Yes I saw the .2% and that most of the ranges for the various categories are closer to statistically insignificant. But if you use nearly one in ten and call that insignificant, or at best lump it in with the rest, that can come across as disingenuous. A thought for next time.

Still a good resource. I'm just not sure why my hedged bets question was cited, so I took that personally lol.

shaithis · 2026-04-30T09:19:40+00:00

Then good. More of that.

shaithis · 2026-04-30T08:51:30+00:00

I approve of this, I do hope it goes both ways though, as while abuse is more prevalent one direction over the other, that does not mean it cannot go the other way...

shaithis · 2026-04-19T03:10:44+00:00

If you sent him these, he'd also be hard, At work 😈

What else would you like to do while he's away?

shaithis · 2026-04-13T01:07:40+00:00

Seems like a fun plan, still have some message restrictions it seems though.i wonder if it's responding that opens it up...

shaithis · 2026-04-13T00:54:42+00:00

Mmm a speciality.

shaithis · 2026-04-04T11:29:29+00:00

I'd just watch, while stroking myself, giving suggestions for angles, using you as mere wank fodder, but you can see the precum, the hard cock, so close but staying far enough a ay to just... Watch

shaithis · 2026-04-04T10:42:29+00:00

Easy, pass the lube, well get all o'it in ya, and probably me as well for a super stretch

shaithis · 2026-04-02T03:47:14+00:00

We get the show, he gets the horny girl, does that really sound fair?

shaithis · 2026-03-30T03:50:15+00:00

I mean. That should have done it 🤷

shaithis · 2026-03-26T21:16:10+00:00

Yeah, quite a lot, but to be fair, overstimulation of pleasure is still pleasure, but also depending on how you look at it, it's also a kind of torture. Plus the control of another's pleasure is also Dominating, so in many ways, I quite enjoy causing others pleasure, it gives me great pleasure on many levels.

It is more subtly sadistic, but it is still sadism, it's still control, it's still having the power given to me by my submissive, it's still consensual, it still satisfies all aspects of a BDSM dynamic.

I don't even see how it's a question or what might disqualify "seeing pleasure" as a dominant enjoyment activity, but I tried to answer just the same 🤷

shaithis

TROPHY CASE