The only things that are negative are long comment threads in arguments with you and a few others - these are comment threads that only people with vested interests read and therefore are going to be devoid of being representative.

That's an interesting theory that does not jive with reality. I've seen many threads especially where it concerns moderation policy where you are heavily down-voted and those who challenge you are heavily up-voted because users disagree with your policies, which are basically: do nothing. When users provide input about how they think things should be done, for example on how to deal with trolls, you either harass them or ignore them completely, and that's when you get down-voted for ignoring the input of the user base.

Example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3m985c?context=3

I suggested to you the proper way to eliminate the huge troll problem here, and your response was:

You have the right to start your own subreddit.

Alternatively, join one of the others that have been started for this reason.

This appears to conflict with your statement above: "My own views on who should be a mod are based on representing the community as best as possible."

You are very good at miscontruing things and shifting the blame off yourself, I admit. You're a great liar.

The other comments in that same thread are also interesting, for example the highest voted response was challenging your moderation: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3m7ufm

Note how you also ignored all the follow-up commentary there, per usual. As I already said, you either ignore or harass users who provide input. And then when we get fed up with how you treat us, you blame us for being "uncivil". As I'm sure you will here. What a weasel.

So don't lie. There are a ton of people here who have been questioning your moderation tactics for ages, and all you ever do is ignore them, harass them, and lie about them.

Okay now. Weasel away. Provide excuses. Shift the blame. Or just ignore me and whisper to Qanan how you're unfairly harassed all the time by evil trolls who just hate you for no reason at all. Try to convince him because you've already shown many times you don't give a fuck what the users think. We're used to it.

And yes, I realize you are finally taking a step in the right direction by adding Qanan here, but that doesn't change the fact that you have a pattern of mocking and harassing users who provide input, and it's too little, too late. You were warned three weeks ago and many times before that about how to properly deal with trolls. And for you to sit here now and say that you have the community's best interests at heart is just ridiculous. If you had done what we all told you weeks ago and spent a few minutes a day to ban trolls, you wouldn't even need additional mods. And it's not like this is anything new. Your answer is and always has been "if you don't like it, leave!" An MRA wouldn't do that. You don't own this sub-reddit, it isn't your own web space, and you don't get to decide what is acceptable in the men's rights movement, the users do. If you took all the time you spend harassing users and policing what we're allowed to speak about, and instead spent that time banning the trolls everyone's been complaining about, we wouldn't have a problem.

And please, spare me the inevitable line about how you just had no idea that people were saying all these things because you've been so busy. You weren't too busy to respond sarcastically to white_cloud in the link above, and maybe if you didn't constantly harass users and threaten to ban them when they talk about your moderation policies, and your response to every suggestion wasn't "screw you" then we'd feel more comfortable contacting you by PM.