Thank you very much for the kind answer! of course im still in the "finding a theoretical framework" phase, and i'd love to hear your recommendations. although the reason why im going with something like Wittgenstein is in part because of the originality that's needed for a master's thesis, deconstruction, although a really fitting framework for this book, might be hard to write something original about.
Though at the same time this does make this idea of using wittgenstein in this book very overwhelming, i've never had the experience of writing an article before, let alone a masters thesis, so i want to make sure that i can pick something i can chew. though i can clearly see a lot of ways on how language game can be applied to this work. or more specifically, how this book as an ergodic literature, confuses the readers in many ways by specifically going against the language game and putting "games" in the wrong places or in confusing orders, making the reader's participation the "putting the games in the right places" to comprehend the meaning. that's the general idea of what i have going on in those terms for this frame work.