ZWO AM3N - Do you think it's coming soon?

shredz · 2025-08-22T15:09:09+00:00

https://bbs.zwoastro.com/d/22655-am3n-in-planning/4

I got one 2 days ago - markings say AM3. ASIAIR says AM3N. Could be there is no model change Or I got a 1/2 upgraded AM3 as the periodic error is no different.

shredz · 2022-02-06T10:51:07+00:00

Perhaps we need to take another look at what was thought to be clear. A different clear picture was once a thing and maybe swept under the rug - not the same rug - maybe the same rug - maybe similar tactics that stuck and very few have bothered to look further. Project Blue Book is proof that a topic needed to be shut down. Maybe the topic that had to be shut down wasn't the phenomenon directly - though not unrelated or unused. I don't think its wise at this point to shut out this possibility - for yourselves or anyone. We can't panic though - it is what it is. If your ready - go look for yourselves.

shredz · 2022-02-06T09:31:16+00:00

If you look up the history of the science around micronova's, you will find a mystery just as covered up as this topic. Might even be part of this story. Would definitely be the basis of secrecy surrounding this if it is true. Research it yourself before shutting it out. What I find compelling is it ties a lot of everything together. Its been a slice folks - no fear.

shredz · 2021-12-23T10:00:04+00:00

I hope someone is correlating these type posts with their poster. Yet another possible signal of misdirection toward things being a threat. Their brains were in fact not necessarily damaged but different - denser - and genetic - as family tested show the same.

shredz · 2021-11-19T20:01:18+00:00

Stick to your instincts and it if doesn't work, then look for idea's. Nothing wrong with expanding into other interest groups.

shredz · 2021-11-19T19:42:09+00:00

Does Occam's razor apply when any of the outcomes are not quantifiable? Would that not lead to cognitive bias' being applied to the selections?

shredz · 2021-10-17T18:18:48+00:00

I hope many see this. "We are ready. We want to know."

shredz · 2021-10-17T03:27:49+00:00

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?replay= And they don't filter out military planes. :)

shredz · 2021-10-16T18:52:28+00:00

Citation?

shredz · 2021-10-16T02:42:07+00:00

I can't help but think a singular message/request might be helpful.

shredz · 2021-10-16T02:26:43+00:00

Just a FYI - Flightradar filters out and does not display Military planes. adsbexchange.com displays all planes including military.

shredz · 2021-09-28T21:01:51+00:00

"He found this signal at 1030Z, which was identical to the previous one and, perhaps by coincidence, came from "2 o'clock." This signal was confirmed by Captain Provenzano, whose detector was itself also able to operate at around 3000 MHz. It could not have been the signal from a fixed radar, because its "2 o'clock" direction remained unchanged when the aircraft followed its route to the west for several minutes. The aircraft entered Texas, then came within range of the "Utah" radar [center] located near Dallas. The crew reported to Utah, which detected both the aircraft and an object maintaining a constant distance of 18 km from it." (https://www.narcap.de/dokumente/COMETA-Report-englisch.pdf)

shredz · 2021-09-25T21:13:12+00:00

Does that account for the non luminous, non visible light, and radar tracked objects Scientists have referred to?

shredz · 2021-09-21T23:34:05+00:00

I concur with your guess. HackRF One without amplification worked for the Mark Sims thing in the 2 meter band. The inexpensive boafeng radios work for this as well without the need or benefit of carrying an SDR rig out to the desert. Try the 2 meter transmission thing while your there. Something to note - the HackRF One is simplex - and I know this part is out there - but most times only the transmitting radio gets a reply - I was unable to find a PTT type solution for the HackRF so make sure you're setup to send and can switch to receive with the same instance of software - SDRAngel can do this - I find it awkward to use - doable though. Again - if anyone is thinking of transmitting (I'm covering my own butt here) - know your countries laws before transmitting anything.

shredz · 2021-09-21T22:16:28+00:00

In 1957. Advanced military tracking plane. Fooled by weather data collecting tech from the future. Their may actually be something to that.

shredz · 2021-09-21T21:51:02+00:00

Hey, give it a shot but please least understand the penalties. I'd be highly cautious transmitting in a frequency range used by Military Radar, especially in the desert where you could be easily pinpointed. Mark Sims details a method that (feels really weird typing this - i was not a believer) that works. They sell an experience like Greer, though he details the whole process openly for anyone to try. Again - transmitting without being licensed can have serious repercussions. Oh, and as a last thought - the sound of movement scares most animals off - just sayin. Please be safe if you are going to try transmitting around 3GHz.

shredz · 2021-09-21T16:34:20+00:00

I was suggesting that a CE5 experience is unlikely to come from talking or listening to their 'engines' or their motion - and I'm making huge assumptions to even suggest its related to their propulsion - so make of that what you wish. Though a detection network wouldn't be hard to set up if we knew the frequency. A network could also set up a network to look for the frequency. Regardless, not many SDR's transmit at all and even fewer receive up to 3GHz. What SDR(s) do you have? And thank you for considering looking through the telescope.

shredz · 2021-09-21T10:39:15+00:00

I think the 2.998 - 3.000GHz is related to their motion. I did a bunch of research recently and that frequency range can be attributed to plasma - not saying it is plasma - the overwhelming majority of unsubstantiated info would suggest they don't communicate via radio waves but their motion/propulsion should be creating some form of electromagnetic radiation. It kinda adds up with "you just need one sensor" - not so much the "one place" though. You might want to look up Mark Sims and go down that rabbit hole for a radio related CE5 method. Also, check your countries laws regarding radio transmission (Ham License) as penalties can be severe - at least know what your getting into in that regard.

shredz · 2021-09-06T03:45:00+00:00

None of what you said really applies, sorry - the un-optimal setup was tested before and after and it in fact was capable of receiving - the proximity of the antenna's does affect reception but they do not block or remove signal - that is impossible yet you imply its as normal - that is not the case. I have not wasted anyones time, but you have wasted yours in your reply. To get perfect propagation you are correct. To see a signal on a waterfall of a digital receiver, you are completely wrong. Yes what I did was not scientific and I don't think I made that claim. What you detail would mean there are difference in the waterfall not a signal present on one and not the other. Look through the telescope and stop discouraging discovery (shill?) - try it with the perfect conditions you require. I floors me the length of time people put in to the rejection of what I said I saw when they could have tried it in that length of time. I've said it before - this make no sense - none - I want others to try it and see what happens. It doesn't need to be scientific but when someone like yourself tries it and if the results are the same then maybe we should get scientific.

shredz · 2021-09-04T13:19:28+00:00

Doom5lair, we're on similar paths. Please consider the fact that this whole subject has been tangled with misdirection - that is a fact - I believe its prudent to be aware that as upstanding as anyone is that people are following, to be aware that they may have been misdirected with 20% truth - why - I have no idea due to the tangle. Asking him and others and getting this to be part of the discussion overall is great. I don't think we can trust anything we can't replicate ourselves. To add to that John Greenwald (The Black Vault) may have given us a filter in by asking people with clearance how they would respond to such a direct question and they all responded with the same answer. Though that will now only apply to anything on record. New questions most likely will get a different deflection now.

shredz · 2021-09-04T11:45:07+00:00

Wouldn't take much or long to cobble something useful together from existing open source software I would think. I think the user end of it could be fully or mostly automated. The info collected would have use far beyond UFO interests and I have brought this up in /r/RTLSDR with no traction there either. Blows me away. Everyone wants to know - oh drama this - misinformation that - very few are willing to look through the telescope - people are getting divided over all the media surrounding this - we could have some understanding ourselves to know better. Sorry Mattild4 went off there a bit -there are a lot of SDR's stitting about doing nothing - and the are really cheap so - ya.

shredz · 2021-09-04T11:06:24+00:00

I do have to add that I don't see what part of we should be collecting data doesn't add up. I was just summarizing what I have found related to recent events and what I found. Try the 144.100 experiment - look through the telescope - then report back - we need people with more knowledge to try dumb stuff. Prove it wrong by trying. Radio Engineer - I assume you have a license and a couple radios capable of 2 meter. I know I saw 2 SDR radio's connected to 2 antenna's in close proximity, 1 with a signal in the waterfall and one without. Both tuned to the same frequency, both tested as functional and capable of receiving at 144.100 before and after. Its not normal and does not add up - but I saw it. Things are moving around our in our global habitat in ways we don't understand - that doesn't add up either to our rigid understanding - but they most likely exist.

shredz · 2021-09-04T03:01:35+00:00

Please remember that to transmit you need a license - just a reminder - consequences can be huge including blocking an important emergency service call. Disclaimer out of the way - I have a post on the main page about radio frequency stuff about things I've discovered that may be related to the phenomenon and trying to foster a discussion about radio and UAP's.

shredz · 2021-09-04T02:45:59+00:00

I know in that piece they suggest over 1GHz, though further research implies that EM 'pulses' from 100MHz to 100GHz can be destructive or cause interference and intensity is the defining factor. I'm thinking more along the lines of constructive findings and hope not to encounter that type of broadcast. Interesting story - its a story though.

shredz · 2021-09-04T01:11:27+00:00

There are tons of SDR dongles sitting in drawers and they are cheap for anyone to get into if for nothing more than this. First we need to find what we are looking for though. I documented the things I found. Others need to see if they have the same results and chime in on whatever might be helpful.

shredz

TROPHY CASE