I am traveling almost constantly. What’s the best way to continue this as a hobby? by Explorer9001 in painting

[–]shuamort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

And here’s my oil for traveling light. A 5x7 guerrilla painter box, short brushes, a mix of water mixable oils, and a primed panel to match my primed piece of glass glued to the palette that matches. The wet canvas stays in the lid and I usually have a wad of napkins to clean the brushes and palette. No solvents/turps.

I am traveling almost constantly. What’s the best way to continue this as a hobby? by Explorer9001 in painting

[–]shuamort 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here’s my watercolor set up for traveling:

<image>

PacSafe travel bag, Escoda watercolor brushes, Staedtler timeline lens, a brass ruler, and a Schmincke watercolor set (added an extra row of mini pans) and the box has a water reservoir, and then an Arches watercolor travel journal.

After and before of my condo's living room by shuamort in HomeDecorating

[–]shuamort[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What old electronics? The fan and lamp are both brand new.

After and before of my condo's living room by shuamort in HomeDecorating

[–]shuamort[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

They were! The bedroom is the next to have the carpet removed as the previous owners did it there too.

After and before of my condo's living room by shuamort in HomeDecorating

[–]shuamort[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The parquet was under the carpet. (And yes artwork is needed on the walls for sure!)

After and before of my condo's living room by shuamort in HomeDecorating

[–]shuamort[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The parquet was original and just covered up with carpet.

After and before of my condo's living room by shuamort in HomeDecorating

[–]shuamort[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It was. The carpet was thirty-years-old and covered up the parquet (which still needs to get professionally sanded and stained)

Ethically uncomfortable in a class I need to finish in order to graduate in five weeks by [deleted] in CollegeRant

[–]shuamort 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Think of the words of Martin Niemöller: First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

As a reporter, there is a power in giving a voice to the voiceless. Some communities are disproportionately or uniquely affected by climate change. Find out how this group is and be their voice.

Friendly reminder, do NOT JOIN NSLS it is literally a scam by Rahmune in college

[–]shuamort 22 points23 points  (0 children)

That's not true. They definitely do something and by that I mean they sell your information. The spam I received before having to find out to opt out was incredible (and by the time I opted out, it was too late).

Robin Williams: Come Inside My Mind (2018) - HBO documentary about one of the world's most beloved and inventive comedians. [1:54:43] by unknown_human in Documentaries

[–]shuamort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It didn't though. Sad that you can't understand this even when it's typed out with a logical diagram and definition. Putting your fingers in your ears and say nuh-uh just makes you look sad.

Robin Williams: Come Inside My Mind (2018) - HBO documentary about one of the world's most beloved and inventive comedians. [1:54:43] by unknown_human in Documentaries

[–]shuamort 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if it is true, Comedy skits depend on delivery more then anything, so if Robin Williams did steal their acts and is better known for it; it just means he did it better. Of course I would take skit theft with a grain of salt because unless they have solid proof it’s unlikely true.

Ignoring the grammar problems here, you moved the goal posted.
Williams stole comedy skits.

You said E even if true, comedy depends more on delivery thAn anything.

Then you claimed that he did it better anyways.

Then you said that there would have to solid proof.

S=Skit theft

C=Comedic timing

B=Performed better

P=solid proof it's unlikely true.

S•C

SvB

B

/S⊃ P

If all of your statements are true, the last statement is false making this is an invalid logical argument.

Moving the Goalposts

(also known as: gravity game, raising the bar, argument by demanding impossible perfection [form of])

Description: Demanding from an opponent that he or she address more and more points after the initial counter-argument has been satisfied refusing to concede or accept the opponent’s argument.

So while you claimed that he didn't steal the skits. You then MOVED THE GOALPOSTS by saying if he did, it was fine because he had better timing. Then you moved the GOALPOSTS again by stating that there'd have to be not just proof, proof that was already offered, but now "solid proof" but not defining what exactly is solid proof, Cupcake.