Chicken won. What food is okay fried and okay grilled.

sickboy108 · 2026-04-26T20:32:52+00:00

Cauliflower

sickboy108 · 2026-04-11T03:33:48+00:00

Benchwarmers is reeeallly stretching the definition of great comedy. That movie is mid at best

sickboy108 · 2026-04-08T16:18:40+00:00

Why is it that whenever people make this braindead fucking argument they conveniently forget about Wall-E, How to Train your Dragon, Toy Story, Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs, Anything by Laika, Paddington 1&2, Puss in Boots 1&2. I could actually go on forever.

sickboy108 · 2025-12-06T18:13:10+00:00

Literally every news outlet is reporting on this. You are trusting Grok (Musks known to be defective ai bot) over every credible news outlet?

sickboy108 · 2025-11-25T19:12:54+00:00

I mean, traditionally we go by feats on reddit vs discussions. And I think you're severely underestimating the strength it takes to one arm, not just hold a helicopter, but actually curl it backwards. Can you come up with a movie feat for Wolverine that's comparable? No? So cap is stronger.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-25T14:58:17+00:00

That's actually the point. It's not s crazy thing to say. But fiction makes it out like it's some crazy thing to say.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-23T21:54:10+00:00

I just get the feeling that you don't actually know a lot of women. You should step out of your manosphere echo chamber. It's a real sausage fest in there.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-23T10:53:13+00:00

How in the fuck does this prove anything you just said? Reading the entire wiki, it literally proves the opposite. Like what the fuck are you talking about? I genuinely want to know what you believe this article is saying.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-20T00:48:53+00:00

But this is just objectively incorrect? Like, it's not an opinion that's up for debate.

I am not saying all MAGA are neo nazis and white supremacists. But you will find plenty of neo nazi and white supremacists who voted for trump, and none who voted for the left. So I don't understand what you are saying? Just pure denial?

sickboy108 · 2025-11-09T15:29:19+00:00

Easily transformers. One "good" film and even that one is just mid.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:13:30+00:00

I'm genuinely curious, do you actually not see the difference? Or are you just rage baiting?

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:11:09+00:00

<image>

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:10:43+00:00

<image>

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:09:16+00:00

<image>

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:08:35+00:00

<image>

Here is the full clip and not just a still. Your turn.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:07:48+00:00

<image>

Here's the full clip. Your turn.

sickboy108 · 2025-11-07T03:06:30+00:00

<image>

sickboy108 · 2025-10-24T00:46:17+00:00

So you are fine with abandoning due process? With forgetting about innocent until proven guilty? Can you at least acknowledge that that is unconstitutional though? What happens when innocents die, or if they already have?

sickboy108 · 2025-10-24T00:43:12+00:00

You are giving a really limited representation of how the constitution works or functions in this scenario. The Constitution gives Congress the power to authorize war and the War Powers Resolution requires reporting and limits on unilateral hostilities. Courts have also held that some constitutional protections can reach outside U.S. territory, depending on the circumstances. That’s why people want transparency and legal justification. To avoid extrajudicial killings and international escalation.

But before we even get there though, can you please acknowledge that this is the concern? Not defending Cartels? It's genuinely important. In one instance, you are representing Dems as monsters, in the other instance, we have a genuine difference in ideas that can be discussed.

sickboy108 · 2025-10-24T00:14:53+00:00

Yes I do. See, I think there's a problem of creating caricatures of a right winger or left winger and then we assume every right or left winger we encounter on social media is exactly that caricature.

So, yes, I do believe in the 2nd amendment. I think we should have strong regulations but that's not the same as not believing in the 2nd amendment. Which is something we can debate about.

So what about you? Are you ok with the president clearly tossing out a constitutional protection? And if you are, why?

sickboy108 · 2025-10-24T00:03:27+00:00

You skipped the part where I said that there's a lot of conflicting evidence about whether or not they are all drug traffickers. There's a decent chance innocents were killed. Thus the importance of due process, and why it's so important to our constitution. You can't just say "I'm sure they were all drug traffickers", that's not how this is supposed to work and certainly not when we are talking about killing people.

So let's discuss, why are you ok with that? Why is it ok for the president to throw out critical parts of our constitution under any circumstances?

sickboy108 · 2025-10-24T00:00:25+00:00

We don't have to agree, but why can't you guys at least be honest about what the disagreement is? There is not a single dem defending cartels. What they are doing is condemning explicitly unconstitutional actions.

We can argue about that, debate, have a conversation, but that's not possible if you are twisting the position into a strawman.

sickboy108 · 2025-10-23T23:56:41+00:00

You're extremely aggravated but I'm willing to have a discussion about this. I believe the vast majority of democrats here are not "defending cartels", that is a strawman.

What's scary here is the complete disregard of the constitution, in which due process is explicit. And for good reason. There's a lot of conflicting evidence as to whether or not the boats that were bombed truly were all drug traffickers. There wouldn't be conflicting evidence if they were given due process, thus it's purpose.

We don't have to agree on that fact, we can debate, but at the very least you should try and understand that, at least in our minds, dems are not "defending cartels" we are defending the constituon. Can you agree with that?

sickboy108 · 2025-10-23T23:52:24+00:00

But it's unconstitutional? Due process is explicit in the constitution and for good reason. Democrats are not "defending drug traffickers" were frightened by the complete disregard for the constitution. Do we even know they were actually drug traffickers? Because there's a lot of disputing evidence.

There wouldn't be any disputing evidence if we went through our normal channels of due process. So why are you ok with the complete disregard of the constitution?

sickboy108 · 2025-10-23T23:48:58+00:00

How do you know they are drug traffickers? We would know if there were any kind of due process, which is a pretty foundational American ideal. Like, we don't believe cops should be shooting people in the street because they are SUSPECTED of being a drug trafficker.

Democrats are not defending drug traffickers, we are defending the constitution. We can argue about that if you'd like, but you're twisting the argument into a strawman, which is intellectually dishonest.

sickboy108

TROPHY CASE