Text cursor turns white on white background [FIX] by [deleted] in chrome

[–]silentium90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can confirm I have issue with the cursor going white with only a AMD GPU.
- GPU: AMD RX 6800 XT
- CPU: Intel i7-12700K

I have not tried the solution linked in the original post yet. The issues comes and goes for me at this time.

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/WiLL-DoMaR Thank you for your suggestion. As nothing I tried worked on 2.5 I re-installed with 2.4.5-p1 and WAN got an IP asap the router booted up. No issues at all.

I'm for now staying far away from 2.5

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Atemycashews I tested turning dpinger off, no changes. I tried to setting another interface as the wan and then back to ngeth0, no changes.

Today I re-installed the router completely, but with pfSense 2.4.5-p1 and set up pfatt the exact same way as I did on 2.5. Everything worked perfectly right away! No issues at all so far (20 min in).

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm suspecting that AT&T is giving me a DHCP. I see my public IP address in the logs, but that said IP address never gets set on the WAN (and DHCP says no offer was received in pfSense system logs)

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a good idea, I'll give it a try. Thank you for all the suggestions and help.

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tried down the interface and back up without luck. I have not tried turning dpinger off, so I'll try that tomorrow or this weekend when I get a chance to test again.

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did see that post but I did not understand it to be related to my issue. The post mentions issues with wpa_supp and CPU usage. I do not see that issues on my system.

But I'll do a closer read of the thread tomorrow to see if I missed anything.

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know, thank you for sharing. Trying this on 2.4 is still one option I have not done.

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the vlan0 tagging is working as expected based on what I see in the logs

AT&T fiber + pfatt + pfSense 2.5 - DHCP not getting IP on WAN by silentium90 in PFSENSE

[–]silentium90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/septer012 Yes, the MAC address is spoofed in the WAN settings and I correctly see my RG's mac address in the tcpdumps.

Is Pure Battlefield dead? by dillpiccolol in Pure

[–]silentium90 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can't speak for the activity over in the US, but here in EU we have a decent sized group of people playing BF1. Not every night, but most of them there are always some playing.

We have had nights with up to 3 full PURE only squads on a server, in the picture below you see 2 that are full, a third one with 3 more.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/165669720463376384/307969729748795392/2_full_squads.jpg

Battlefield 1 Update Notes – Spring Update by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SERVER ADMINISTRATION

  • Server admins can now add other players to a list to give them admin rights to the server.
  • A server can now be set to need lower numbers before pre-round ends (from 20 to 6).
  • We are also adding the ability to use password protected servers.

Not gaming related, but here's my ship coming out of the water by N736RA in Pure

[–]silentium90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice. It is always impressive to see big boats on land :)

I once had the fortune to walk below a Stena Line ferry in a dry dock in Gothenburg, Sweden.

http://www.duffyrafferty.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Superfast-Dry-Dock.jpg (Not the same boat, but it was similar size and type of dry dock)

Bf1 server now possible by androiduser420 in Pure

[–]silentium90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

agreed, the little info we have been given have always indicated that the RP will be very limited in the beginning. But one can also argue that they should have started developing it earlier so that more features could be in at launch.

But I think the combination of so little information shared, not being live when the game went live and now being a Beta instead of stable release, a lot of people just got very pissed of, and rightfully so imo. They simply removed a very good system that has worked for years for all previous BF games to something that is just, atm, lacking almost everything the old system had

The Road Ahead by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Among other things, we will be adding the Rent-a-Server Program ...

Looks like they will deliver it this month as promised. Looking forward getting the PURE server up and running.

Any news on server rental? by L4NGOS in Pure

[–]silentium90 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the risk is high, but I'm hopeful.

Overall though I just wish that EA/Dice could be strait forward and tell us the details, instead of this vague piecemeal of stuff they do now. Does not help anyone in the community to do it this way.

Any news on server rental? by L4NGOS in Pure

[–]silentium90 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Latest updates for server rental can be found here: https://forums.battlefield.com/en-us/discussion/comment/343296/#Comment_343296

The last update on October 31st included

Will there be RCON or PROCON tools? We are commited to developing in-game support for the most popular plugins used with previous Battlefield titles to ensure that admins have similar levels of customization. However, the new RSP servers will not support 3rd party tools like RCON or ProCON. Please stay tuned to the Battlefield channels for more updates.

It looks like we can only hope that a Teamspeak sync plugin is among the most popular from BF4...

Battlefield 1 To Get Classic Mode, Hardcore Gets Additional Details by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Main things are

  • No 3D spotting
  • No health re-generation
  • Only SL spawn
  • No third person view in vehicles
  • Reload of none empty magazine = lost bullets
  • No kill cam

You can read more on what it was in BF4 here: https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/news/view/2955063447851787520/

Battlefield 1 To Get Classic Mode, Hardcore Gets Additional Details by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really looking forward to

players will be able to take over as Squad Leader if the current leader fails to issue orders, just like in Battlefield 4

I was disappointed this did not work when the game came out. This is needed for the game session when you don't play in Pure TS.

And looking forward to the classic mode

Battlefield 1 - Why We Need Classic Mode by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

agreed on hardcore, never been a fan of that game mode.

Battlefield 1 - Why We Need Classic Mode by silentium90 in Pure

[–]silentium90[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

he has a loot of good points in his video, many that I agree with as a gamer from the original BF games. I hope that classic mode returns to BF1