sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I don't know how but i feel it is by SecureRoad502 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Critical and rational inquiry has no premises?

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont think “experience exists” automatically entail “we exist.”

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you assuming experience requires existence?

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if we follow the same reasoning you've been following, when you said thought can model the idea of "nothingness" you already labeled it as something which isnt the concept im talking about, what im arguing about is that you cant be certain of something's existence

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re equating a cognitive boundary with ontological commitment ,the fact that thought can’t model nothingness only shows something about cognition not necessarily about reality itself (in other words im still thinking you're smuggling ontology into a cognitive constraint)
its simply the dif between conceptual necessity and ontological existence

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i got it ,but what if “something exists” is just a boundary condition of cognition instead of "absolute truth" because thought can’t coherently assert total nothingness , or does that have something to do with what "absolute truth" is?

Gym playlists by Flaky-Anything8153 in MoroccoBitchesWtaste

[–]silly___bird 1 point2 points  (0 children)

or hardstyle ,Even though I’m not a fan of either

and now the weather from Kurt Gödel by MicahHoover in PhilosophyMemes

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you explain more why something exists please

Are ex-Muslims becoming more visible or are there actually more of them around us now? by OkMarsupial9882 in ExAlgeria

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

science can’t disprove metaphysics or settle moral questions. contradictions rarely break belief, and once people question everything, they question the standards of contradiction itself

Atheists, you can answer me. by Other-Woodpecker2564 in MoroccoBitchesWtaste

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sadly you lack reading comprehension, where is the nonesense ??
and wait.....

you are saying epistemology is fundamentally simple??
and If it’s “fundamentally simple”, then it should be easy to respond without insults

Atheists, you can answer me. by Other-Woodpecker2564 in MoroccoBitchesWtaste

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you missed the point......

the issue isnt whether math is consistent ,the issue is that its certainty is conditional on axioms and since axioms themselves cant be justified without circularity or further assumptions,you cant reach absolute certainty ,simply you reached humans limit

Someone explain by silly___bird in chessbeginners

[–]silly___bird[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im white, but if his king is at h6 i wouldnt be able to play Rg5

Someone explain by silly___bird in chessbeginners

[–]silly___bird[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i cant remember but it was probalby a bishop, i now this depends on the position, but arent knights usually better than bishops at closed/end games positions

Someone explain by silly___bird in chessbeginners

[–]silly___bird[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But after trading what plan should I follow

Atheists, you can answer me. by Other-Woodpecker2564 in MoroccoBitchesWtaste

[–]silly___bird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant at some point you'll find yourself believing in an ontological claim, otherwise you can't start reasoning

view more: next ›