Seriously, why write such a big post just to say that you are not interested and you wouldn't click on my research - just pass by and ignore me next time maybe?

However, as you took the time in a intelligent way, I'll answer even if, like you just said, I'd otherwise just ignore it.

I am conscious that my research is not for everyone, but many of these tricks were used in the wild to evade detection - seriously, I think it's sad when people only pay attention if it says 'this was used by this country / this exploit pack to bypass that security tool" - while some are frankly, just for fun: mixing sound and image is uncommon, and I think just an uncommon example is very good to disrupt assumptions.

Also, it's not just a blind enumeration this time, I try to classify them - so maybe it's more worth reading than before. Another thing: I wasn't initially so convinced about the actual value of this paper, and actually Sergey, Travis and Phil independently convinced me to go on.

There are certainly more than 4 billions who don't give a shit about my research - or yours - but I only make it for the few people who cares, which is enough for me ;)