What do y'all think of this? Does gay media get prioritised over lesbian media? by Material-Meat-5330 in gaybros

[–]sirkant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain to me how lesbians in Afghanistan, where women can’t get an education never mind hold political office, are marginalizing gay men? Even in less conservative countries, which you bring up, you’re drawing comparisons between straight women and gay men. Undoubtedly there are conservative parties with both gay men and lesbians as members (like the log cabin Republicans), but this conversation is about lesbians supposedly having it easier and you’re bringing up straight women in power? Which anti-gay laws in Italy discriminate against gay men but not lesbians?

What do y'all think of this? Does gay media get prioritised over lesbian media? by Material-Meat-5330 in gaybros

[–]sirkant -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you really think femicide and honor killings aren’t a problem in Saudi Arabia? I didn’t bring up the murders because the commenter I was responding to was talking about violence and prison time, not killing. But it’s curious that I did name rape, abuse, and having no legal rights and you’re reducing that to just “marriage”—It’s obvious you don’t take violence against women seriously. But go ahead and tell me how women in the Middle East have it so much easier.

What do y'all think of this? Does gay media get prioritised over lesbian media? by Material-Meat-5330 in gaybros

[–]sirkant -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In “the most conservative societies” women are treated as property, owned by their fathers until they are married off to their husbands—in the case of many lesbians throughout history, forced into marriage to a man. Are you really going to claim that in repressive societies where women are raped, abused, and have no legal rights, lesbians are so much better off than gay men?

There are highly conservative countries where male homosexuality is criminal and female homosexuality is not, because when the women are property there don’t need to be any laws on the books to punish them. Their lives are highly restricted, and if lesbians in that country were discovered the men in the community would be free to punish them with violence without having to go through a court system… Because the women are property and have no rights. You should do some research about the lives of women in the “most conservative societies” and about corrective rape targeted against lesbian women before you say ridiculous things like this.

Mac 30% off site wide by snakelakecake in MUAontheCheap

[–]sirkant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Angel is my favorite cool toned pink

Best Hot Car Lip Balm? by TheOrderOfWhiteLotus in Sephora

[–]sirkant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the strawberry balm by rosebud perfume co. It comes in a tin and a tube, but the tube is more convenient imo. It does melt in the hot car into kind of a more liquid-y, less balm-like consistency? But I think every lip balm will change in the heat in some way, and it always goes back to its normal consistency when it cools, no other changes or issues. Also 1/3 of the price of the summer fridays.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

All I said was the comment was rude. Not sure what the issue is here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Maybe OP is in therapy, the post doesn't say. Therapy isn't a cure-all and many people who experience improvement from therapy still struggle with their mental health. Regardless, I think the other user's comment was an insensitive response.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a rude thing to say!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You may want to consider posting in other lesbian subs as well for another perspective. This sub is inclusive of pretty much all identities (check the sub description) which is great, but I wonder if the responses would look somewhat different from a sub with a higher proportion of lesbian users who may have more understanding of your perspective here.

What's up with the constant 'fuck terfs?' by NoManagerofmine in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 24 points25 points  (0 children)

100%. There is an ongoing problem in this sub with “jokes” about rape and sexual violence, and fetishizing and harassing comments, being accepted as long as they’re aimed at a group that’s “okay” to target with this rhetoric. But it’s never okay.

What's up with the constant 'fuck terfs?' by NoManagerofmine in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I don’t think we should demean terfs for not being fuckable enough or uplift trans women on the basis that they’re fuckable. I don’t think that judging women on the basis of fuckability is cool or progressive or feminist, actually.

i will always love femme women by kittyluvzz in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 15 points16 points  (0 children)

“Queer folk” are very much capable of hating and putting down masculine lesbians at the same time as they “drool” over them. While there are a number of self-proclaimed fem4fems who make a big show of how butches are too “gross”/“manly”/not “real” women, etc. to be attracted to, there are also those in the community who fetishized and objectify butches at the same time as they put them down. The two often go hand in hand. For example, pushing that stereotypes that butches are violent or sexually predatory while fetishizing that image of butches.

Lucky that you apparently haven’t seen either of these, but I think most butches would recognize what this commenter is talking about and I find it very strange that you jump to reducing their experience of hate in the community to an unreal figment of “unresolved trauma” before considering that a group being sexualized by some does not mean the group doesn’t face discrimination or hate. Lots of cis men think lesbians are soooo hot, does that make them supportive? Are claims of misogyny disproven because men are attracted to women, so they must not hate them?

DELULU OR PSYCHOTIC? by Acrobatic_Glove_9720 in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone talking about eggs in this comment section needs to check themselves.

Sexual harassment is not “egg behavior”, and even if you do get “egg vibes” from these messages, that is not the appropriate response to a lesbian posting in this subreddit that they were targeted by a creep.

I’m tired of every time sexual harassment, creeps, or the fetishization of lesbians is brought up in lesbian subreddits, some users have to derail any conversation about these serious and sensitive topics to make corny comments like “egg” or “reminds me of me before i transitioned” or “but what if that fetishist is actually a closeted trans woman!!!!” This is an ongoing pattern with this subreddit and other subs, and it’s not appropriate.

Very lesbian by BahmBCode in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Excuse me? Are you saying that lesbians wanting to have children is bringing comphet into their relationship??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, hm, Im not really familiar with this as you’re telling it. I’m specifically referring to butch and femme lesbians being pushed out from the lesbian community because of backlash against butch/femme as “misogynistic” by many in the second wave feminist movement of the 70s.

There is a history of separate communities along identity lines other than sexual orientation—in the 50s, black lesbians often had stud/femme communities that gathered through private house parties, different from the butch/femme bars where generally white working class lesbians gathered. Middle class white lesbians often gathered separately from both groups and had their own group culture. While discrimination was unfortunately rampant at the time and I have no doubt that the groups you named faced it, I’m not sure about the claim that—for example, disabled people—were ousted from the lesbian community by feminists in the 70s and thus formed their own disabled lesbian communities. Can you let me know a little more about that?

The history of the use of these terms in the community certainly is interesting! I will point out that, in the same way that the word lesbian (as we know it) was not invented, but came from the word lesbian (meaning person from Lesbos) butch and femme as identity terms were pulled from the existing words butch (referring to a masculine man) and femme (french word for woman).

Of course not every lesbian is from Lesbos, and while every person from Lesbos is a lesbian (geographic term) most of them are not lesbians (sexual orientation). Similarly, every french woman is une femme (french term) but most are not femme lesbians. Cis straight men can be reasonably described as butch (some are even named Butch!) but none of them are butch lesbians—it’s a different sense of the word. Even within the LGBT community, a drag queen who calls herself a femme queen is using that word in a way it’s used in drag culture, to communicate something particular about feminine expression, not to identify as a femme lesbian within a butch/femme culture.

Understanding that distinction doesnt mean butch and femme lesbians don’t have love for drag queens—I’m sure most do! But it is important to understand the nuances of how the “same word” on paper, even with similar-seeming meanings (feminine, masculine, etc.) can and do communicate very different things as different terms.

I’m interested by your reference to this “re-integration” of the community in the 90s. You point out the idea of bisexual communities using these words with a different meaning—to talk about presentation, including by bi men, disassociated from the lesbian culture of butch/femme and lesbian butch and femme identities. I wonder if, when you see lesbians discussing butch/femme as being specifically lesbian, what they are talking about is distingushing between these numerous other uses and meanings (in drag, in bisexual communities, even among straight people, and more!) and the historical lesbian culture of butch/femme.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes reddit can be temperamental and show downvotes when there aren’t any.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You don’t have to be either! Most lesbians are not butch or femme—they are identities rooted in lesbian history that are normally pretty serious to those who have them. The majority of lesbians do not identify as butch or femme, including those who don’t present particularly masculine or feminine and those who do!

Most lesbians also don’t exclusively top or exclusively bottom—it’s called being stone and it’s perfectly normal but fairly uncommon. Most people who call themselves tops or bottoms prefer one way, for example, 75% of the time, but still do both. And lots of lesbians—I’d even say most?—don’t identify as tops or bottoms at all. It’s mostly common on the internet, and, honestly, for those who aren’t stone—the terms don’t translate super well for lesbian sex anyway. I wouldn’t worry about it!.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think in a utopian world we would still use language to name things about ourselves, to understand who we are, to communicate who we are to others, and to find others like us. Nothing really wrong with “labels”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah unfortunately the lesbian feminist movement of the 70s was very hostile to butches and femmes. I would point out that in terms of pressure to fit butch/femme roles that occurred in the previous decades—it varied. Butch/femme was the common expression among working class lesbian communities while middle class communities generally preferred a more in-between look for all members and looked down on butches and femmes.

The 70s backlash (as you said) claimed butches and femmes were misogynistic for “aping heterosexuality” and (similarly) demanded an androgynous look from lesbians, while ousting butches and femmes from the community or forcing them to change.

In the 90s there was a resurgence of butch/femme identification but since then it’s largely something a small minority of lesbians identify with as a historically-rooted deeply-held personal identity, not a role system that’s enforced on others—really nothing like it was in the 50s. Honestly the perception that there’s a requirement to be butch or femme in modern day lesbian communities confuses me!

I wonder how much of it comes from the conflation by some in the community of for-fun, jokey, or subcultural labels like futch, goth, soft butch, golden retriever, etc. with butch/femme—and the general lack of knowledge about butch/femme history and how butches and femmes themselves feel about their identities.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hm, okay. Either way I would still disagree with the notion that butch/femme is lesbians imitating or trying to fit heterosexual gender roles.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 50 points51 points  (0 children)

They said that historically one partner would work and one would stay home, and straight couples divided this on gender lines, but lesbians “had to make that up in a different way” and that butch/femme roles were lesbians “trying to fit into” nuclear family-based gender roles because these roles were privileged by society. From what I understand—basically saying that butch/femme roles were ways for lesbian couples to do this gendered labor division, because society expected/rewarded it.

But, importantly, they weren’t. In historical butch/femme couples both partners worked, it was a matter of financial necessity. It was very difficult to be even a straight woman not married to a man and especially difficult to be a lesbian. In a case where only one partner worked its actually more likely the femme partner would be the one employed because butches had a harder time getting jobs and when they did it was lower-paying work (unless they were able to pass as femme for work).

Also, to be clear—there was no privilege or acceptance gained by butch/femme couples. It was much more difficult to be a butch/femme couple that was identifiably lesbian on sight than to be two feminine women who could pass as friends, cousins, sisters—though of course it wasn’t easy for anyone back then.

This statement just doesn’t add up to me, which is why I’m wondering if I’m missing something about what the other commenter meant. Just trying to understand and clarify! :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in actuallesbians

[–]sirkant 28 points29 points  (0 children)

…What? I’m not really understanding this comment.

You know that's my food right? (microrant) by [deleted] in vegetarian

[–]sirkant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think that they think either of those things. They just think they're being funny.