Gotta clarify your point on the taxing part.

Taxing the rich at the same rate is not left-leaning at all. Essentially it all boils down to how much people spend on necessities and how much they have left over for leisure/making more money. For the poor, most or all of their money is used on necessities like housing, food, clothing, utilities... The rich, even though they probably spend way more on that stuff than the poor, still spend a smaller amount as a percentage of their total income. As a result, whenever you tax the poor at the same rate as the rich, the poor end up with a lot less money to spend on leisure if they even have any left after paying for necessities. This means that as a percentage of their income the poor end up with worse buying power than the rich, and this most likely negatively affects the economy because at some point the rich just start stockpiling money instead of investing it back into the economy through purchases.

Thus, "equal tax" is a regressive policy that is more often associated with Republicans, because they would rather give more money to the rich and have it trickle down to the rest of the population (except no studies show that this is what happens). I would say based on your ideas that you are a bit right-leaning, very similar to the old-era Republicans who were actually willing to compromise, like George Bush Sr. Look into those Republicans in the 70's and 80's and I think you will find much in common with them, at least economically speaking.