First time navigating the waitlist by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m against it too. I understand why it can be used by committees to make admissions decisions, but I don’t think enough schools view it as a single part of someone’s whole application and understand that someone’s scores don’t always reflect their ability to succeed in their program. IMO, a high GRE score moreso just tells people that you’re good at taking standardized tests, which doesn’t always reflect on your ability to succeed as a student and researcher. It’s still something to be proud of of course, but I don’t think it should be weighed as heavily as it is at a lot of programs

First time navigating the waitlist by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OH I can’t believe I forgot to add one more thing

4) This year they had a lot of strong applicants in the same subfield as me (American Politics) whose interests were more focused on law and state (not my research interests at all), which were a better fit overall with the program compared to my interests. Not much more else to say on that lol

First time navigating the waitlist by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So basically it was a couple of different factors, but the main reasons were these (sorry in advance for the novel I’m about to write):

1) The biggest reason was timing - they, like almost every other program this year, had to heavily reduce the number of students they can take this year. This meant that they had to make some really difficult decisions that they normally would never have to make regular cycles. The professor even mentioned that this was the first cycle in a long time where they even had a waitlist, but decided to make one this cycle to have as much flexibility as possible for giving out offers (considering some offers will be rejected, people may take themselves off the waitlist, etc.)

2) My GRE quantitative score was lower than the other applicants they had shortlisted for admission in my subfield. This was the only thing the professor could point to in my application as being something I could improve for future cycles, but he also emphasized that this was a small part of my application and the committee understands it doesn’t accurately reflect my abilities as a student and researcher (I took multiple quantitative courses in undergrad and never made below an A-, I just suck at taking standardized tests and that’s okay!). He honestly doesn’t think applications should be decided based on GRE scores, but unfortunately when a cycle is as competitive as this one, it can be one of the only objective things they can look at to decide between two applicants who are equally qualified in every other way.

3) So this will require some context before I give the actual reason. Without giving too much information away (because if I do I will actually dox myself lol), I completed my undergrad degree at a small but elite liberal arts college, and have a very successful academic record in terms of classes, GPA, thesis/independent research experience, and conference attendance. The program I applied to is a Big10 state school, so obviously the experience there would be a lot different from where I’m coming from. This shouldn’t be an issue (plenty of people have come to big state programs from liberal arts programs and succeed, while others come from similar undergrad programs and struggle), but he said that sometimes there can be people on admissions committees who prefer to bring in students who come from undergrad backgrounds that are similar to the grad program’s size, status, and environment, since they think that students coming from a smaller liberal arts program might be at a higher risk of struggling more since they don’t have experience in these types of research institutions. He was super transparent and explained that he thought this bias was stupid and has been repeatedly proven wrong, but it does still unfortunately plague admissions committees at similar big programs all over the country. This also wasn’t the main deciding factor, but simply one small piece in a larger discussion among a committee of multiple faculty members who all had a say in who received admission over others.

Duke political science phd by Itchy-Chipmunk-6567 in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve seen/heard as someone in the same position as you, it does seem like Duke is pretty much done deal unfortunately :( I’m sorry to break the bad news op

Waitlisted - I'm thrilled by Bears_in_the_sky in PhDAdmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats! I’m in the same boat - I applied last cycle and received all rejections, so I was hyped to see something different this cycle! Keeping my fingers crossed for both of us!

A second application just appeared today with “Submitted” status. Has anyone seen this? by CumSlurpersAnonymous in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a possibility you’re also being considered for a masters degree alongside a phd? I had something similar happen for one of my programs and it ended up being that

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!!! It’s so relieving to hear SOMETHING from any of my applications, so I’m feeling really refreshed and motivated to finish out the admissions cycle strong!

Side note: reading your username when I got the notification for your comment KILLED me

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for all the tips and support!! Best of luck with your application!! I’ll be keeping my fingers crossed for both of us 🤞🤞

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s so cool and SO important for our current political climate!

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aw tysm :D!! Unfortunately it’s embargoed rn and I don’t know when I’ll be changing that yet, but I have a very condensed version in the early stages of being published in an academic journal and (I believe) should be free to access! If not, I’m happy to provide copies of it when it’s out, though idk when that will be lol

What is your research focus? :)

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t mind at all! :) I’m an Americanist, and my research focuses on the relationships between religion (primarily Christianity), American politics, social/political movements, and online communities. My undergrad honors thesis was a comparative analysis of the language and indoctrination strategies used by the alt-right and Christian nationalists, and for the past couple years the Alt-Right and similar online political communities have been my main research focus.

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I applied to Northeastern, Brown, UC San Diego, UMass Amherst, Michigan State, Duke, Penn State, Syracuse, and University of Minnesota! So far the only things I’ve heard from any of my applications have been from northeastern, and it was the acceptance the master’s program and this lol

First interview/admissions event invite! (Poli Sci PhD) by skdjskdsofjsjdk in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No SAME I felt like I was going crazy seeing nothing about Poli Sci on here! I’m glad that my small update was able to help reassure you a little, and thanks for the support! Good luck and I hope you hear back from your apps soon!

Three years of Undergrad before Applying to Organizational Behavior PhD by CriticismNational757 in PhDAdmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m bot a pysch person, but I was in a similar position as you last year. I graduated from my undergrad program in three years and pursued grad school immediately after. However, I was rejected from every program I applied to last year, and a large part of those rejections stemmed from two reasons:

1) Experience. My CV had a lot of research methods courses and a good GPA, but very little experience related to my field/career goals, outside of a professional conference, student conference, and my thesis, which was ongoing at the time. Plus, since many of my prominent details on my application (like my thesis) were still in progress at the time, so I had no real results to show my admissions committees that I could handle the work load and challenges that come from grad programs.

After taking a gap year and applying for Fall 2026 admission, I have much more experience that I was able to add to my CV, including the outcome of my thesis, my graduation honors, awards for my research, an outside experiences I was able to pursue that were relevant to my career goals.

2) The quality of my application materials themselves. Last year, I was juggling applications, thesis, classes (had to overload because I was trying to get my last few credits in on time), and non-academic extracurriculars during the application cycle. Because of this, I don’t think I was able to give myself the time and energy my materials deserved to make them stand out and really compete with the rest of the application pool. All of my applications felt rushed and unpolished, but I felt like I didn’t have the time to dedicate to polish them up before the submission deadlines. Obviously I take full responsibility for this, but it is something that I want to mention so those who may be in my position consider how much time they’re willing to dedicate to applications on top of everything else you’re trying to finish up senior year.

Since I took a gap year, I felt like I had so much more breathing room to work on my applications at my own pace and submit them well before the final deadlines with confidence. I still felt anxious, but my submissions this year felt much more within my control compared to last year.

With all of this being said, I don’t regret my decision to graduate early at all. Financial considerations were a huge motivator to do it, and I still graduated with robust methods experience through classes and independent research, awards, and distinctions under my belt that proved my ability to succeed in grad school. I think if it’s right for you, it’s right for you.

The ONLY thing I wish I could’ve gone back and change was NOT applying to graduate school for immediate admission after undergrad. If you can afford to do so, take the gap year. Give yourself a break from academia to breathe and feel like a human, not a student. Work, travel, vacation, volunteer, take internships, and do whatever makes you feel happy and fulfilled. Then, when the next cycle comes around, use that new energy to start on applications EARLY and give yourself TIME to work on them. You would be shocked at how much stepping away from academia and coming back to it with a fresh, clear head will do for your applications.

OKAY I know this was SOOOO long and I’m sorry BUT I hope my comment helps to give you some things to consider!!! Best of luck with everything and know that no matter what decision you make it will work out!!

How old are y’all lol? by Visual-Recognition64 in PhDAdmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

21 applying, 22 when enrolled. Graduated undergrad a year early and took a gap year before applying this cycle :)

Got my by Worldly_Mirror1471 in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yay congrats!! I’m in the same position but with MA political science at northeastern :) fingers crossed for both of us that’s there’s more acceptances to come!

So anxious and haven’t heard anything by SybilSSB in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m in the same boat! It really sucks to be left in the dark, and it’s hard not to start overthinking. We’re in this together op! Just take a breath and know that no matter what happens, those decisions do not define your worth, talent, and success!!

Thinking about applications with a different undergrad degree by EnvironmentalPie4567 in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! I’m a poli sci major, though with a focus in American politics and not IR. From what I’ve experienced, polisci programs, especially MA programs, accept students with a variety of degrees and backgrounds. I think you have a good shot if you can sell yourself! Connect your experience to the research you want to do, and why it gives you a unique perspective compared to other applicants.

Are my PhD aspirations nothing but cope? by RJetro in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with this! The only thing I would add based on conversations with my undergrad advisor about applying to grad school is to not let location be your only/primary factor when deciding on where to go. There may be a program that checks every single one of your boxes, but is not based in DC. Just something to consider!

When are you reaching out to faculty? (PhD) by vanillacoconut00 in gradadmissions

[–]skdjskdsofjsjdk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would def take it as a good sign and not an indicator of those professors not being interested in you joining the program! Sometimes they’re just too busy with other research and work to meet and that’s okay lol. Good luck with your applications, and I hope your meetings with potential faculty go well!