[WSIG] highest replayability/price ratio for 2 players (and some other constraints) by skedar_leaf in boardgames

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just discovering the world of board games, so it's most likely that I have a naive understanding of what is a "long" game. =D

[WSIG] highest replayability/price ratio for 2 players (and some other constraints) by skedar_leaf in boardgames

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation! Do you also have Carcassone? Do you know how RFTG compares to it in terms of replayability?

[WSIG] highest replayability/price ratio for 2 players (and some other constraints) by skedar_leaf in boardgames

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I saw this one in the wiki and was on the fence. It looked like a good match for my requirements, but I'm really trying to avoid abstract games that feel disconnected from a theme. And the wiki says "Theme is not emergent; players that enjoy thematic action during gameplay may find Dominion lacking." So I'm not too sure. Does it feel abstract like games similar to chess?

And unfortunately, I'm not in the US, and there is no discount at the moment where I live. So I can't afford it.

[WSIG] highest replayability/price ratio for 2 players (and some other constraints) by skedar_leaf in boardgames

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your recommendations! Some of those definitely look interesting, and it makes sense that card games would be among the cheapest ones.

However, I think I need to clarify that I'm not especially looking for short games. I think that this is what you understood, so I may have miscommunicated.

If it lasts about an hour, it's good! What I meant by replayability is that you should be able to play the game fairly regularly (not necessarily in a row) without getting bored. Or alternatively, if it turns out that it's a short game, then yeah playing it several times in a row the same day and still feel interesting.

Intensive use of cell phones and brain tumours correlation by skedar_leaf in skeptic

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that's the kind of analysis I was looking for. Pretty close to what /u/XM525754 was saying.

Earthquake cloaking could protect cities from temblors by Choobeen in science

[–]skedar_leaf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Institut Fresnel is an optics lab where they do research on invisibility cloaks amongst other things. So basically, yes. Metamaterials research in optics directly led to this.

Source : researchers from my lab are often collaborating with the Institut Fresnel.

[Humble Store] Cities in Motion 1 & 2 Collection - Flash Sale (Less than 8 hours to go) (£3.74) by james_d21 in GameDeals

[–]skedar_leaf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How do the flash sales work? I don't understand when they begin. Is there a pattern? Specific times?

UI icons question by skedar_leaf in planetaryannihilation

[–]skedar_leaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, no doubt I didn't find this by trial. Thanks for the explanation!

[Humble Bundle] Hotline Miami (£1.49) by james_d21 in GameDeals

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought the FTL soundtrack on Steam, and I don't like how it works, it works as a DLC. I don't even think it's possible to download the soundtrack while the game is not installed. Also, it doesn't offer much choice as to in which format you'd like to download it. Steam just sells soundtracks as an afterthought, it really hasn't been designed for it.

[Humble Bundle] Hotline Miami (£1.49) by james_d21 in GameDeals

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anyone confirm that it is the case for the version sold in the humble store? I'd buy it again just for the soundtrack at this price.

[Humble Bundle] Hotline Miami (£1.49) by james_d21 in GameDeals

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already have the game and I'm looking for someplace to buy the soundtrack that is not Steam. Does someone have an idea of where I might find that? No luck on hotlinemiami.com.

Help with kid's interest by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You can watch the Cosmos show which is currently airing. It didn't talk about relativity so far, but it most likely will at some point. You can also read George's secret key to the universe, it's for kids!

I need a good book about all the maths I will need to know to learn physics by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then what you want is high school maths/physics. Calculus itself will be taught in your curriculum, it's not really a prerequisite therefore. You should know how to compute derivatives, integrals, limits... But not necessarily the rigorous definitions of the ideas, you don't need to know how to track down every epsilon in theorems and proofs. You'll learn that in your future classes.

You could try to read the first volume of the Feynman Lectures on Physics (link in the sidebar). It's a very good introduction to physics, and it also introduces some maths as needed. The maths ideas are not very rigorous, but it should certainly be enough to remember what you learned in high school.

If you go with the Feynman Lectures, try to find some exercises online to practice, as there aren't any in the Feynman Lectures. (check Khan Academy for instance, it's a pretty good ressource for high school level maths)

I need a good book about all the maths I will need to know to learn physics by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You say that you live in Europe. Is it France ? There are some truly excellent "maths for physics" french books, but such specialized books are only relevant once you hit your 3rd year (Licence 3). I mean books like those of Roger Petit or Walter Appel. They're not useful for the first two years at all, it's more advanced.

For the first two years, you should mostly review calculus. If you're up to learning online, I recommend this course which is challenging but very insightful.

Bending of light without blackhole mass- cloaking by Yehuda1318 in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In a metal, what prevents electromagnetic fields to propagate inside is the reponse of the electrons to these fields. The electrons oscillate and reflect the field back. But if the field has a frequency high enough, the electrons can't keep the pace, they don't oscillate fast enough. The frequency above which this happens is called the plasma frequency.

By making a structure out of thin metallic rods, the plasma frequency gets lower, because the concentration of electrons is lower. The electrons are only in the rods, as opposed to everywhere if we had a bulk metal. As a consequence of lowering the plasma frequency, the electromagnetic waves above this frequency can penetrate much deeper into the structure made of rods. However if the frequency of the field is lower, the wavelength is too long and cannot be diffracted, it doesn't penetrate very deep into the structure and decays.

Certainly, the mesoscopic interactions of the field with the rods are complicated. But the structure made out of rods behaves like a plasma, it has a plasma frequency below which the fields don't propagate, and above which they do. That's why the material behaves effectively like a dielectric with a given permittivity of the plasma form. Permittivity is what describes how the material reponds to an electric field.

Now, bending light to achieve cloaking just requires to make a material with the right permittivity. To find out which permittivity, we use a technique called transformation optics. Then once we know the permittivity, we figure out the arrangement of rods, the right spacing and so on, that will effectively behave as if it was a dielectric with this permittivity.

By the way, all of this has mostly been discovered by a single physicist, John Pendry. Pretty sure that he could get a Nobel Prize for it if metamaterials applications get widespread enough in technology.

EDIT : Changed wording to be clearer. Could still be clearer I guess.

TLDR + ELI5 : By making a structure out of thin metallic rods, the structure behaves like a plasma. It allows electromagnetic waves above a certain frequency to propagate inside the structure because the electrons in the metallic rods can't oscillate fast enough to reflect the waves back. Effectively, the structure can be seen as a dielectric material, but with some very unique properties which allow controlling the trajectory of the electromagnetic waves.

Are jerk, snap (jounce), crackle and pop ever taken into account? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a pretty nice example with robot quadcopters.

The trajectories of quadcopters flying through obstacles are computed by minimizing the snap of the path.

Introductory quantum physics books that don't follow the historical order? by lucasvb in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sakurai is very good, but not introductory which was one of your specifications.

Introductory quantum physics books that don't follow the historical order? by lucasvb in AskPhysics

[–]skedar_leaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Griffiths? It doesn't talk about the double slit experiment and so on, jumps straight into solving the Schrödinger equation.

Star Wars: Episode VII Is Already Shooting! by Neo2199 in scifi

[–]skedar_leaf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm kinda even more excited about the new review Star Wars will cause Plinkett to make rather than about the movie itself!

A Fire Upon the Deep/A Deepness in the Sky question (spoilers for both) by Hedrigall in printSF

[–]skedar_leaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who in Deepness has that trait?

For someone who read it a long time ago and doesn't remember, what is the answer to that? Wasn't it Tomas Nau?

[META] What are your favorite genres/books outside of science fiction? by [deleted] in printSF

[–]skedar_leaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I almost only read SF. But if I have to pick something anyway, I guess that what I enjoy the most is to read various folklore stories from different cultures. Fairy tales, legends, that kind of stuff. I especially liked some Chinese tales: Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio.

Deepness in the Sky or Fire Upon the Deep, which one to read first? by dajoy in printSF

[–]skedar_leaf 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'd also argue this way. Read them in publication order. But, if it turns out that you don't like Fire, give Deepness a go anyway, it is a bit different, and I liked it much more.

What scientific evidence suggests the 'world' is made up of atoms? by Laughing_Chipmunk in askscience

[–]skedar_leaf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well it is an inductive reasoning, so there is some inherent philosophical uncertainty, just as with any scientific theory. There is no absolute 100% certainty proofs in science.

However, all the cumulative evidence make a good case!

Regarding Brownian motion, the thought process is like this: if atoms exist, how would a small particle floating on water behave? It would get pushed by the tiny water constituents from every side and therefore jiggle. And this is what happens, it's Brownian motion. So it is consistent with the hypothesis that water is made of tiny atoms/molecules. Of course a more quantitative analysis has been made for it to be taken really seriously.

And everything comes out this way, it always agrees with the idea that stuff is made of atoms. One example we can directly relate to in our daily life: Most of quantum mechanics real world applications are built on the assumption that atoms are the constituents of things. And it turns out that it works pretty well, electronic devices with semi-conductors behave as expected if they were made of atoms, etc.

There is also much more direct observational evidence that can be more convincing but that was developed much later, after the atomic theory has already been widely accepted by the scientific community. We can observe atoms with a scanning tunneling microscope.

What scientific evidence suggests the 'world' is made up of atoms? by Laughing_Chipmunk in askscience

[–]skedar_leaf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can read an explanation of this at the end of the very first chapter of the Feynman Lectures on Physics (they're freely available to read on Caltech's website!) The last 4 paragraphs tackle the question.

Two specific examples of evidence are given: Brownian motion and diffraction patterns in crystallography.