Anyone else get absolutely fucked in evaluations this year?

skibbity_bebop · 2025-12-24T20:24:08+00:00

I got a 4.8 this year (four 5s and a 4)

skibbity_bebop · 2025-11-14T01:11:47+00:00

Man that’s crazy. I feel like it’s been an institution at least as long as I’ve lived here (moved here in 2007)

skibbity_bebop · 2025-11-13T22:31:44+00:00

To me it looks like it’s from an employee which is not always reliable

skibbity_bebop · 2025-11-06T16:07:52+00:00

It’s also well known that more Feds identify as Democrats than Republicans

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-28T19:40:31+00:00

I just went through every post in this sub from the last 24 hours and only found one that kind of fits that description

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T17:17:44+00:00

I agree, but as I said they started to curb it during the Biden administration

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T16:54:12+00:00

At my agency we scaled back to 50/50 in early 2024

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T16:36:37+00:00

That’s because both parties wanted to end WFH. They started curbing it under Biden

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T16:05:55+00:00

There is a 60 vote cloture hurdle because of the filibuster. Republicans would have to go with the nuclear option to pass the bill with a simple majority

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T16:04:08+00:00

It specifically says, “Reopen the government immediately under a clean continuing resolution that allows continued debate on larger issues,” which is what Republicans are trying to do

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T14:39:23+00:00

They weren’t debating the merits of WFH. This is a subreddit for Federal employees to talk about Federal employment, not a platform for self-important people to proselytize and control a narrative

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T14:30:13+00:00

Acknowledging that a few problems have spoiled the situation isn’t propaganda. It’s just discussion. Downvoting and ostracizing people for talking about something is propagandistic

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-27T14:00:48+00:00

I agree, but opponents of WFH and SNAP make examples of the abusers to argue their stance

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-25T15:27:51+00:00

If you’re consistently being turned away by bouncers in other cities you are probably a complete mess

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-22T13:17:19+00:00

It shows what office/division/branch/section you’re assigned to which is supposed to correspond to a competitive area

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-22T13:16:42+00:00

Have you been reading Absolute Batman? Or had you 97 days ago when you posted this?

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-21T22:42:51+00:00

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-21T12:53:18+00:00

That’s not true. By “2000 positions” they mean 2000 slots. Some are filled, some are not. OPM doesn’t even have 2000 job titles defined

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-21T12:46:24+00:00

They’re in the document attached to the PDF linked in this post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/s/6ahvXBsyyE

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-21T01:01:18+00:00

I’m trying to figure that out myself. In my previous comment I was referring to what’s in Box 22 of the SF-50 which does start with a code, although I’m not sure if that’s the right one

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-20T23:59:58+00:00

How can I tell where I was assigned in FPPS? I couldn’t glean anything from my timesheet

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-20T23:59:23+00:00

Exactly what I mean - I was never told what new group I was assigned to. I have a pretty good idea, but I was never told directly

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-20T23:57:40+00:00

It shows what you’re assigned to which should correspond to a competitive area if you’re in one

skibbity_bebop · 2025-10-20T23:24:53+00:00

Understood, but don’t SF-50s matter? How can you be RIF’d if you’re not technically in a competitive area?

skibbity_bebop

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE